HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4001  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 12:37 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
Either way, we'll get to have a very divided city, just as our stupid nation.
I don't think the city is divided like the nation is right now..... Otherwise this thread would mirror CE, and thank god it doesn't.

I just think we have a sharp divide on policy prescriptions for the city's problems, or at least it appears the conversations are not as heavily reliant on candidate's personalities as they are what each side is trying to offer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4002  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:07 AM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 251
Wow, this is turning into a real nail biter of a count.
Johnson is very slightly ahead at this point on chicagoelections.gov.
I didn't expect it to be this close.

Precincts Reported: 1,142 of 1,291 (88.46%)

BRANDON JOHNSON
242,970
50.11%

PAUL VALLAS
241,859
49.89%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4003  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:09 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetline View Post
I didn't expect it to be this close.
What did...you ...expect?
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4004  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:10 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
The only other Alderman race I was kinda looking at was the 46th ward, only because of the conversation about the Uptown Theater in the General thread.

Angela Clay is currently at 55%

As a refresher (if you care about the Uptown Theater):

https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/03...on-want-to-do/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4005  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:14 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,102
A lot closer than I thought, for the worse. Looks like the CTU might get their blank check after all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4006  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:19 AM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
I am shocked. Like really shocked. I thought Vallas has this in the bag easily.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4007  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:30 AM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
What did...you ...expect?
More than a percentage point of spread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4008  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:32 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetline View Post
More than a percentage point of spread.
Well it is now, but in whose favor did you expect?
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4009  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:41 AM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Well it is now, but in whose favor did you expect?
Just about exactly 1%, yeah.

Based on the polls not coming directly from campaigns, I expected Vallas to win. Why the curiosity about my read, did you expect differently?

Precincts Reported: 1,194 of 1,291 (92.49%)

BRANDON JOHNSON
258,594
50.70%

PAUL VALLAS
251,415
49.30%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4010  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:50 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetline View Post
Just about exactly 1%, yeah.

Based on the polls not coming directly from campaigns, I expected Vallas to win. Why the curiosity about my read, did you expect differently?

Precincts Reported: 1,194 of 1,291 (92.49%)

BRANDON JOHNSON
258,594
50.70%

PAUL VALLAS
251,415
49.30%
I was more shocked by not thinking it would be close. Though to be honest, I expected Vallas to be up tonight. Still 25Kish votes left to count and there's no indication of which precincts are outstanding. Johnson certainly has "momentum" but that's only if you believe that they counted all the pro Vallas precincts first with none left to count at the end.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4011  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:57 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,102
Johnson up by 13k votes now. It's over.... will be interesting to see what happens now.

The moderate candidates in 46 and 48 have both lost as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4012  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:01 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle View Post
Johnson up by 13k votes now. It's over.... will be interesting to see what happens now.

The moderate candidates in 46 and 48 have both lost as well.
Well - Here's a question:

Do you think Johnson will be worse than LL?

I expect things to stay the same the same over the next few years politically here. It sucks, but maybe Johnson pivots to be more of a moderate with time, and actually proves himself to be an effective mayor, or at least a better mayor than LL.

And if not..... There's always the next election.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4013  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:01 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Chicago is fucked

4 more years a being a national punching bag.

I can’t wait to see the returns
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4014  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:02 AM
galleyfox galleyfox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Johnson certainly has "momentum" but that's only if you believe that they counted all the pro Vallas precincts first with none left to count at the end.
Well, turns out it’s the South side wards that have left to report, so I doubt there’s any margin for Vallas left.

The white vote was simply underweighted for Johnson, since black and Hispanic turnout was so low.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4015  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:05 AM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by UPChicago View Post
Brandon Johnson will probably be the next mayor.

He ran second or third (behind Wilson) in the majority of precincts Lightfoot won. He ran second in a lot of the SW precincts Chuy carried. Vallas's turnout was extremely poor in black precincts (especially on the west side), and Johnson was the second vote-getter in many of the precincts he narrowly won.

Johnson will consolidate the black vote and turn out voters on the lakefront, just like Lightfoot did four years ago but to a lesser extent.
The results are not very surprising.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4016  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:05 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
Chicago is fucked

4 more years a being a national punching bag.

I can’t wait to see the returns
There's a city council and various state/city laws to get through on everything. Do you think maybe there's a reason why Johnson started backtracking on 95% of the stuff he "promised." Candidates run on empty promises because they take advantage of peoples' lack of understanding of how government actually works in the US. We don't elect someone who just calls the shots unchecked.

I hope he can unite people more but I'm really not very certain that it's as doom and gloom as various people think. The only way he gets what he wants is if a majority of progressives get elected in City Council, which I'm pretty sure is still not the case even after tonight.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4017  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:29 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
Welp I’m pissed and my fiancé is even more pissed. Honestly putting our place up for sale is not out of the question. I’m tired of the crime and the awful state of the CTA while also stomaching a huge property tax increase, and none of this is going to get better within the next couple of years. I hope city council stonewalls Brandon on the tax increases, we can’t afford a anti-business billboard hanging over the city because the rest of us will be left holding the bag for city budget required to pay into the huge pension obligations. Will Brandon pivot to a more pragmatic approach with more carrots and fewer sticks? His sudden support of One Central is encouraging I suppose, hopefully it’s a signal that he wants to encourage growth as a tool to support his goals rather than draconian taxes at a time when we are trying to encourage businesses that maintaining operations in the city is a good investment.

Yes there are still 91,363 mail-in ballots still outstanding, but those aren’t going to favor Vallas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4018  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 2:44 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
I’m tired of the crime and the awful state of the CTA while also stomaching a huge property tax increase, and none of this is going to get better within the next couple of years. I hope city council stonewalls Brandon on the tax increases, we can’t afford a anti-business billboard hanging over the city because the rest of us will be left holding the bag for city budget required to pay into the huge pension obligations.
I agree with most of what you say, but also were you outwardly tired of the crime in 2016 thru 2018? Some parts of 2019 too?

Anyway, you know there's a reason he's backtracked on a lot of the things, including many taxes, he proposed right? It's this plus other things like state laws. He backtracked completely on a city income tax after finding you have to change a state law. He backtracked on a commuter tax when people convinced him how stupid it is, etc. Just like Lightfoot, I think that Johnson already realizes that he faces an uphill battle with city council and other things. He will have a harder time than Lightfoot passing things because he's more to the left than she is and there's not enough support in this camp in city council (I don't think) to get most of what he wants that is far left.

I know it's upsetting, but I suggest taking a step back and realizing how things are passed here. This reminds me of when my mom threatened to move to Belize when Trump won in 2016. It's a very valid response to be pissed but IMO things are typically never as bad as people fear them to be regarding mayoral, governor, and presidential elections. They aren't as powerful as people think. The real power is in city councils, senates, etc. There are a lot of things I will bet a ton of money on, tax wise, that will never get passed as long as there's not a progressive majority in the city council.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4019  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 3:33 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,036
Johnson wasn't my first choice in the runoff, and to be honest I thought he'd be toast against Vallas, but I'm glad the populists scaremongering candidate with few actual plans (other than, *checks notes*, bringing cops out of retirement somehow?) candidate lost. Here's hoping he's a more effective leader than Lightfoot (at least he's more charismatic, and clearly has more political savvy). Now the important question is if he's going to try to reclaim "Let's Go Brandon"?

Ok, I know Vallas was doing his scaremongering as a schtick (that he for some reason didn't drop after the first round) and probably would have for the most part been perfectly fine, but I also expect Johnson to be more pragmatic than people expect.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4020  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 3:38 AM
JMBasquiat JMBasquiat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post

Anyway, you know there's a reason he's backtracked on a lot of the things, including many taxes, he proposed right?
It's because he has no idea what he's talking about and is constantly shifting positions in an effort to keep up with what's cool at that moment. Let's hope he wakes up and realizes he needs to work with others to implement sound policy instead of trying to squeeze out whItE CapITaL like he said he would multiple times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.