HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


    Old Post Office Redevelopment Tower [1] in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 7:57 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,815
Holy potential watershed moment, Batman!

this could be big.

REALLY BIG.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 8:17 PM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/artic...in-post-office

Walgreen looks to move HQ to Old Main Post Office
By Thomas A. Corfman and Greg Hinz May 08, 2014


Walgreen Co. is taking steps to move its headquarters downtown — the old Main Post Office.

Under pressure by some shareholders to move its Deerfield headquarters to Europe, the drug store giant has for months been scouting locations in the Loop, where it would potentially move thousands of jobs.

The company is the largest employer in Deerfield, with 3,500 workers, according to a filing by the northern suburb to bond holders in December 2012. Exactly how many employees would come downtown could not be determined.
Quote:
Real estate industry insiders speculate that Walgreen is the unidentified client of Jones Lang, which has been looking for as much as 1 million square feet of space in the downtown market.
That's pretty big news! Hope they do it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 8:41 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
It doesn't say anything about whether they'd be moving in as-is or waiting for the hypothetical towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 8:59 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,826
Keep fingers crossed!

In the meantime, such positive news/foreshadowing about this in Chi-town, and the Hudson Spire in NY entails:


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 9:06 PM
tjp tjp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
Wow - awesome.

I wonder if they'd be looking at moving all their employees downtown (around 3,500 in Deerfield)... The Crain's article said they're looking for 1M SF of space, but their Deerfield campus has about 1.7M.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 9:20 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
WOW really 1 million thats more than enough to get the project moving, I wasn't really not expecting any news for a while. Now just forget about the whole train thing and focus on the project please IPD
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 9:28 PM
j korzeniowski's Avatar
j korzeniowski j korzeniowski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: logan square, chicago
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchymunch View Post
WOW really 1 million thats more than enough for the 1000 footer I was really not expecting any news for a while. Now just forget about the whole train thing and focus on the project please IPD
i know less about this than anybody here, so. . . let me offer my opinion. . .

when i saw this in crain's, i immediately thought of this thread, of course, and the proposed 1,000'er.

however, then i thought maybe they will use the sizable post office or its skeleton to create a sort of urban suburban campus like they already have in deerfield.

i guess it's the sears of pharmacies, so maybe the walgreen tower (shaped like a prescription bottle?) is a possibility.

anyways. . .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 9:35 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by j korzeniowski View Post
i know less about this than anybody here, so. . . let me offer my opinion. . .

when i saw this in crain's, i immediately thought of this thread, of course, and the proposed 1,000'er.

however, then i thought maybe they will use the sizable post office or its skeleton to create a sort of urban suburban campus like they already have in deerfield.

i guess it's the sears of pharmacies, so maybe the walgreen tower (shaped like a prescription bottle?) is a possibility.

anyways. . .
Ya I just remembered the intial plan meant to re-do the the post office. The article also mention Bill Davies is driving a hard bargain. I wonder if that means he's not open to much change in the project, also I forgot to mention this but whats with Jones Lang were does Booth Hansonn fall in this. Does this mean walgreens is buying the office off of Davies, or is there something I missed.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 10:02 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/artic...in-post-office

Walgreen looks to move HQ to Old Main Post Office
By Thomas A. Corfman and Greg Hinz May 08, 2014


Walgreen Co. is taking steps to move its headquarters downtown — the old Main Post Office.

Under pressure by some shareholders to move its Deerfield headquarters to Europe, the drug store giant has for months been scouting locations in the Loop, where it would potentially move thousands of jobs.

The company is the largest employer in Deerfield, with 3,500 workers, according to a filing by the northern suburb to bond holders in December 2012. Exactly how many employees would come downtown could not be determined.
All I can say is: LOL.

This is a Holy Shit moment if this actually happens. They would unquestionably go Motorola style and take several of the massive floorplates of the post office to create hyper efficient space like in Merch Mart. These massive old buildings (Montgomery Ward, Merch Mart, Fulton Cold Storage, and now the Post Office) are turning out to be extremely efficient for the modern reality of open plan offices. Because the plates are so big and there are very few interior walls, the loss factors in these buildings are rock bottom which means the tenant gets several percent more usable square feet per rentable square foot.

In addition to the USF bump, they also can cram massive numbers of desks into a wide open floorplate like this. That means higher density plans and lower costs per employee. They also typically go with a low cost loft style buildout which simply involves cleaning and painting the structural elements and then installing new mechanicals which sheds huge amounts of buildout costs, again reducing the cost of moving downtown. All in all it might even be the case that most of the 1.7 million SF in Deerfield is turning into 1 million SF downtown because they are seeing massive efficiency increases. I am sure that the expansion possibilities in the Post Office are also very attractive to them. No major corporations like to be hemmed in which is a major reason why they moved to suburban corporate campuses in the first place. They can go up and out at a site like the Post Office.

This means, for massive companies like Moto or Walgreen, that take multiple full floors, downtown office space in a massive old building like this can actually be as cheap as or cheaper than suburban space. I'm starting to foresee a day where Chicago rue's the loss of the other previously obsolete downtown behemoth buildings because they seem to have become an incredible tool for attracting massive businesses to downtown. There could actually be a day where Merch Mart, Montgomery Ward, and Post Office are all 100% leased. What happens then? Are there other targets out there I am forgetting about?

Last edited by LouisVanDerWright; May 8, 2014 at 10:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 11:20 PM
tyleraf's Avatar
tyleraf tyleraf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 566
Wow! Let's hope this happens. It would be great to see something actually go in at the old post office.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted May 8, 2014, 11:31 PM
LaSalle.St.Station's Avatar
LaSalle.St.Station LaSalle.St.Station is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 335
Post Office.

I'd feel better if the Post Office owner was more of a known commodity.

This could signal the end of ( at least in metro Chicago ) fortune 500 headquarters in the outer suburban ring, in lieu of downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 12:26 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
If this happens,

That

Will be

The

Shit.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 1:25 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,381
@LVDW: Can the Takeda Tower at Ashland/Roosevelt be far behind?

This would be a big fish for Rahm for sure... He needs to be giving the full court press to Walgreens and Bill Davies so they reach a deal.

Sucks for Deerfield; they could try to land a big pharma tenant or do housing on the site, but Walgreens contributed a boatload of tax revenue and demanded relatively little in services. They also lost the Bulls last year, which is too bad... For a suburb, Deerfield is actually pretty nice, unlike say Schaumburg. With all this decline, when will IDOT wise up and stop spending so much money in the suburbs? The Tollway mortgaged billions on the continued expansion of suburban jobs/housing, but I don't see the momentum apart from some odd ducks like Zurich.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:04 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
@LVDW: Can the Takeda Tower at Ashland/Roosevelt be far behind?

This would be a big fish for Rahm for sure... He needs to be giving the full court press to Walgreens and Bill Davies so they reach a deal.

Sucks for Deerfield; they could try to land a big pharma tenant or do housing on the site, but Walgreens contributed a boatload of tax revenue and demanded relatively little in services. They also lost the Bulls last year, which is too bad... For a suburb, Deerfield is actually pretty nice, unlike say Schaumburg. With all this decline, when will IDOT wise up and stop spending so much money in the suburbs? The Tollway mortgaged billions on the continued expansion of suburban jobs/housing, but I don't see the momentum apart from some odd ducks like Zurich.
Deerfield is wealthy. Maybe not as wealthy as its actual North Shore neighbors but still definitely wealthy. Highland Park, Glencoe, Winnetka, etc. do a pretty great job without any tax revenue from enormous international headquarters. What were those tax dollars supporting I wonder?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:11 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,419
Fox Chicago just said that Walgreens has no plans to move into the city.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:26 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
WELL...... we all know Fox NEVER lies!! anyways...i would much rather them be the major tenant in that new Fifield west loop supertall! 8)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:35 AM
tjp tjp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
Yeah - the mayor / city manager / whatever is saying that Walgreens assured him that they weren't looking to relocate. Who was Crain's source for the relocation story?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:42 AM
tjp tjp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
Walgreens Denies Move to South Loop; Fioretti Says it Would Boost Area

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140...uld-boost-area
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:58 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjp View Post
Walgreens Denies Move to South Loop; Fioretti Says it Would Boost Area

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140...uld-boost-area
We were all so excited there for a couple hours when we thought this project had a chance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 4:33 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
I believe the Crain's reporting more than I believe those ensuing vague denials.

One key thing here is the Main Post Office's proximity to Union Station and also Ogilvie -- the current Walgreens HQ is close to the Milwaukee District North Line, which runs to Union Station. It would ease retention of employees if they were told they'd end up with short commutes to a Metra station somewhere, and then a short (and "happy and healthy") walk to the new HQ. I think this has been a relatively common pattern in recent suburb-to-downtown relocations.

Didn't Sullivan Center get Walgreens internet operations as one of its launch tenants several years back? Presumably those staffers also might relocate to this new HQ.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.