Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas ej
It's funny how some of you think that these African cities somehow won't evolve for the better, if not in terms of how some of us like "urbanism," at least in the living conditions of the people, once their economies get richer... hopefully their governments won't turn their backs on their people.
|
I mean, it
may happen, but it's really staggering how little progress the four dozen or so countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have had up until now.
In terms of middle-ish income areas, you have the island nations like the Seychelles, Mauritius, and Cape Verde, which don't provide a good development model for the rest of the continent. You have Gabon and Equatorial Guinea, which are rich due to petrodollars, but in practice the ruling class hoards most of the money and the population isn't well off. Then there's Djibouti (by virtue of its strategic port), Botswana (by virtue of diamond mining - and actual decent fiscal management), Namibia, and South Africa (both of which have the highest income inequality in the world, meaning the poor don't live appreciably different from elsewhere in Africa).
Lots of very poor African nations have economies growing at rapid rates. However, they were growing from such a low base that it will take generations to even become middle-income nations. Somewhere like the Congo could see per-capita income increase by 1000%...and still only be at the level of Paraguay or Jamaica.
Things will get better in Sub-Saharan Africa, I'm sure. But there's no sign of anything like the "Asian Tigers" on the horizon.