Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg
This whole conversation about Valour and attendance just makes me angry again that they hired an apartment designer to design IGF and not a stadium designer. A proper stadium architect would have known not to put soooo many seats in the lower bowl end zones, they are so undesirable from a value perspective. I'd much rather sit in the upper deck than the end zones – and I think Bomber fans prove that point as well. Mosaic got it right.
|
That was a client decision, not the architect's. I remember when David Asper first trotted out the plan, he touted the full 360 seating bowl. The perception was that it was "big time". For what it's worth, he wasn't wrong... it looks cool and it's not that there are tons and tons of endzone seats... the number is pretty marginal.
Contrast with old Winnipeg Stadium... when they put up the upper decks in the 1970s, they boasted about how many of the seats were between the goal lines. And all but the north end zone seats were between the goal lines. No one cared that the south end zone was an open field... that would never fly today.
(Related fun fact: the west side upper deck at Winnipeg Stadium was the first upper deck in a Canadian stadium when it was added in 1972)