HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


1000M in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1281  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 8:02 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
Quote:
Chi-Larry
….This building will make a handsome addition to the skyline of Chicago! ….Now, let’s Hurry, Hurry, Hurry, and get this thing built, before the next real estate downturn gives this building an unwanted height reduction (Hair-Cut), as has happened in the past, with other buildings here.

Posted on Oct 24, 2019 | 2:39 PM
Which buildings is this user referencing?
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1282  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 8:03 PM
kolchak's Avatar
kolchak kolchak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 873
https://www.chicagotribune.com/colum...outputType=amp

Financing has not been finalized yet according to this article. It also looks like it would be financed in phases...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1283  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 9:00 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: South Loop
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by cozy View Post
Which buildings is this user referencing?
I believe the original building pitched for this site several years before 1000M was a concept was much taller and thinner? I'm 80% sure of this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1284  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 9:02 PM
Donnie77 Donnie77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 280
Numbers just don't add up imo..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1285  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 9:08 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by gebs View Post
I believe the original building pitched for this site several years before 1000M was a concept was much taller and thinner? I'm 80% sure of this.
Not quite. See the image in the top left of the thread for the original proposal. A landmarks commission didn't think it respected the Michigan Ave streetwall so it was downsized and Jahn said the design looked bad when shrunk.

The user above was referring to waterview, which stalled during the financial crisis and sat embarassingly unfinished until 2011.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1286  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 1:04 AM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie77 View Post
Numbers just don't add up imo..
Yeah, I agree. And financing in stages.... has this happened with a major project in recent times? I honestly don't recall something like that happening with any of the buildings now under construction. It points to the fact that they can't land financing for the entirety of the project.

I know there's a lot of people on this forum who keep saying this is a great project, and will have great views, and so on and so forth. But a lot of you are looking at this building in isolation, and not comparing it to the competition. To make an analogy, every time I see a new Cadillac, I think "hey, those are nice cars." And indeed they are. But whenever I put down my hard earned cash, I always end up buying a BMW or Mercedes. I doesn't matter that Cadillacs are nice cars. I prefer what I consider something better.

South of the river is the proverbial "other side of the tracks." At that price point, people almost always go north. At least for downtown condos (maybe not Hyde Park).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1287  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 4:46 AM
The Pimp's Avatar
The Pimp The Pimp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago/Hamilton Lake
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgolch View Post
Yeah, I agree. And financing in stages.... has this happened with a major project in recent times? I honestly don't recall something like that happening with any of the buildings now under construction. It points to the fact that they can't land financing for the entirety of the project.

I know there's a lot of people on this forum who keep saying this is a great project, and will have great views, and so on and so forth. But a lot of you are looking at this building in isolation, and not comparing it to the competition. To make an analogy, every time I see a new Cadillac, I think "hey, those are nice cars." And indeed they are. But whenever I put down my hard earned cash, I always end up buying a BMW or Mercedes. I doesn't matter that Cadillacs are nice cars. I prefer what I consider something better.

South of the river is the proverbial "other side of the tracks." At that price point, people almost always go north. At least for downtown condos (maybe not Hyde Park).
Waterview.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1288  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 4:39 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pimp View Post
Waterview.
I don't think that was what happened. If I remember correctly Waterview got started without financing secured.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1289  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 4:42 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlw777 View Post
I don't think that was what happened. If I remember correctly Waterview got started without financing secured.
correct. Teng started work on waterview on their own dime, hoping to eventually secure financing that never materialized after the economic meltdown of 2008. and Teng eventually ran out dimes.

very similar to what Kelleher tried to pull off at the old spire site, though he didn't get as far along in construction before the bust.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1290  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 4:42 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlw777 View Post
I don't think that was what happened. If I remember correctly Waterview got started without financing secured.
I believe waterview did get a small mezzanine loan during initial construction..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1291  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 4:49 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
correct. Teng started work on waterview on their own dime, hoping to eventually secure financing that never materialized after the economic meltdown of 2008. and Teng eventually ran out dimes.

very similar to what Kelleher tried to pull off at the old spire site, though he didn't get as far along in construction before the bust.
. . . Right. . . and let's not forget that Kelleher swooped in only after Fordham started and failed to get anything done there. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1292  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 6:19 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,069
While I'm skeptical of this whole project, I do think this would be a good future neighborhood for luxury high-rises. People say that it isn't at the moment, but I'm talking about 10-20 years down the road. Props to 1000m for starting a trend. I see no reason why park and lake views combined wouldn't be super desirable.

Hopefully NEMA II will happen as well an we'll see tons of them pop up, like Central Park in NYC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1293  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 6:28 PM
ThirdCoaster ThirdCoaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
While I'm skeptical of this whole project, I do think this would be a good future neighborhood for luxury high-rises. People say that it isn't at the moment, but I'm talking about 10-20 years down the road. Props to 1000m for starting a trend. I see no reason why park and lake views combined wouldn't be super desirable.

Hopefully NEMA II will happen as well an we'll see tons of them pop up
Agreed. Ignoring the over-confidence of this particular project, it's hard not to see the similarities between this location and Central Park in NY.

This has proximity to one of the largest urban parks in the country, plus views of a large body of water, proximity to the world-class Museum park, local transit options, and grocery stores. All of which should make this a very desirable neighborhood both now and in the future.

I predict that within 15 years you'll start to see another row of skyscrapers coming in behind on State and Wabash to take the last few vantage spots of Grant Park/Lake Michigan.

Within 20 years I could see there being proposals to re-develop Dearborn Park 1 or 2.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1294  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2019, 5:32 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,476
October 24, 2019



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1295  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2019, 6:59 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 521
Gotta love the added snark in the parking signage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1296  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2019, 8:58 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,069
An excavator? Okay I'm starting to get a little excited

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhawk66 View Post
Gotta love the added snark in the parking signage.
They sure don't F around
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1297  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2019, 4:07 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
https://www.bdcnetwork.com/1000m2019

James McHugh Construction breaks ground on 1000M, Michigan Avenue’s tallest tower to be
McHugh will start work on the 832-foot-tall residential tower in December 2019.


...Greenburger confirmed that construction on the $470MM project will commence in December. 1000M has sold 23% of its 421 luxury residences to date.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1298  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2019, 4:23 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,749
^ Bombardier proves his insider creds once again.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1299  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2019, 4:33 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,069
Nice!

Am I the only one that actually likes the new design a lot? I dig the curves...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1300  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2019, 5:07 PM
RedCorsair87 RedCorsair87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 519
I really like the stainless steel/aluminum. Like most towers this cycle, I'm sure it will look better than the renderings once completed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.