HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 2:57 AM
tempedude tempedude is offline
Dbacks baby!
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tempe/metro Phoenix
Posts: 812
my point is ..a lot more office space is on the way
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:22 AM
PHX_PD's Avatar
PHX_PD PHX_PD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 209
^ Wrong thread for CityScape, but Phase II calls for a 37 story residential tower and a 37 story hotel.

Last edited by PHX_PD; Dec 17, 2007 at 2:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 6:36 AM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
Where did you pull the figure of 17 floors...and for a hotel?

Phase II should either two residential towers or one residential and one office, there won't be another hotel as far as I know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 1:55 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, California
Posts: 7,202
Phxbyrd, that 8 stories of parking is needed somewhere--would you rather them put it underground (at $30k a space), chopping that off the height, or even worse in a separate structure?

PD, every massing model I've seen has the hotel tower--I think it's actually a hotel and residences--the same size as the tower to the north. ftp://phoenix.gov/pub/DOWNTOWN/patriotsplan2.pdf puts it at 37 stories. I think the compression artifacts in HX's image turn that 3 into a 1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:45 PM
Vicelord John Vicelord John is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Eastlake, Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 5,404
the more i look at this the more i think of arizona center #2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 5:57 PM
kevininlb kevininlb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Vandercook View Post
the more i look at this the more i think of arizona center #2
Is that a bad thing? (I'm not being sarcastic; I don't know.) I'm assuming it is. I was there on Sunday and it was half-full of people (mostly students) and there was quite a lot going on (which is more than can be said for downtown, which was a ghosttown outside some homeless guy getting naked outside Subway). Anyway, my point is I like Arizona Center, although I'm sure it has a ton of shortcomings I'm unaware of.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 7:23 PM
HooverDam's Avatar
HooverDam HooverDam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Country Club Park, Greater Coronado, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevininlb View Post
Is that a bad thing? (I'm not being sarcastic; I don't know.) I'm assuming it is. I was there on Sunday and it was half-full of people (mostly students) and there was quite a lot going on (which is more than can be said for downtown, which was a ghosttown outside some homeless guy getting naked outside Subway). Anyway, my point is I like Arizona Center, although I'm sure it has a ton of shortcomings I'm unaware of.
The AZ Center is usually fairly full with people, however its generally disliked because its turned in on itself and presents blank walls to the street. Its a very Desert Ridge-suburban style design, it doesn't fit in an urban setting.

I don't see why Vandercook thinks Cityscape will be another AZ Center though, it has towers with residential and hotel as well as retail on the 'outside' of the development. I think Cityscape has a chance to be more like San Diego's "Horton Plaza" than the Arizona Center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 7:29 PM
Vicelord John Vicelord John is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Eastlake, Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 5,404
I say it will be like AZ center because much like AZ center, it does not appear to have retail facing the sidewalks, but it does seem to have walls.

edit: shit these threads are hard to keep track of... I was thinking I was posting in the Cityscape thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2007, 4:41 AM
ConstruktPhx ConstruktPhx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8
The other reason that is increasing the floor-to-floor heights for OCPE, as compared to 44 Monroe, is that OCPE is a steel structure, while Monroe is cast-in-place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2007, 4:59 AM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
Oh really? That means it should go up fairly fast right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2007, 7:29 PM
ConstruktPhx ConstruktPhx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8
Yes, the building should be erected fairly quickly due to it being a steel structure. Overall, a steel building will top-out quicker than a cast-in-place structure, but it won't get started as quickly. The starting schedule is longer due to steel detailing and fabrication lead-times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2007, 7:33 PM
AZ KID's Avatar
AZ KID AZ KID is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 440
So when do you think construction will start?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 6:29 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
The tower crane height of 440' was approved by the FAA and shows a work schedule of December 15th, 2007 - October 15, 2007 in the report itself.

https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...eCaseID=540311
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 7:32 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
So we have about 2 months until the crane is used on site? That would be coo if 44 Monroe and the Sheraton's tower cranes are still up, giving us an additional crane on the skyline, although I wouldn't be surprised if one or all of them would come down by then. But who knows...

Hopefully there will be about 1-2 months of site prep/lowest level excavation, meaning the groundbreaking is immenant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2007, 11:53 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
Now we're talking!!!

Permit# BLDS-T459429 Issue Date 10/15/07 Expires 10/14/09
Permit Description 26 STORY HIGH RISE OFFICE SHELL
Project 06-1166 CENTRAL PARK EAST
Address 50 E VAN BUREN ST Zoning

Description/Scope of Work: COMMERCIAL NEW

SCOPE OF WORK: BLDG STRUC PLMB MECH ELEC LSC PLAT SITE TRAF CIVIL

DESCRIPTION OF WORK: 26 STORY HIGH RISE BUILDING CONSISTING OF 1 LEVEL BASEMENT, GROUND FLOOR RETAIL, 9 LEVELS OF ABOVE GRADE PARKING AND 16 LEVELS OF CORE/SHELL OFFICE SPACE.

This permit is issued just for shell building.


Level Occupancy Area Occupant

Basement S-1 18,303 37
Ground M 8,434 281
Ground B 3,650 36
Ground S-1 3,745 13
2 B 653 7
2 S-2 15,015 75
3 S-2 25,886 130
4 S-2 25,886 130
5 S-2 25,886 130
6 S-2 25,886 130
7 S-2 25,886 130
8 S-2 25,886 130
9 S-2 25,886 130
10 S-2 25,886 130
11 B 25,395 254
12 B 25,714 257
13 B 26,020 260
14 B 26,020 260
15 B 26,020 260
16 B 26,020 260
17 B 26,020 260
18 B 26,020 260
19 B 26,020 260
20 B 26,020 260
21 B 26,020 260
22 B 26,628 266
23 B 27,030 270
24 B 27,030 270
25 B 26,420 264
26 B 26,420 264


I highlighted floor #13, because there will actually be a floor #13! So there are actually 26 physical floors, not 25 as other buildings would do when they skip #13.

Looks like this thing should break ground any day now. Does anyone know what the "S-2" and "B" mean for the Occupancy? And then there is a number for occupant...so are all the floors already assigned to occupants or what do these numbers mean?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2007, 12:08 AM
tempedude tempedude is offline
Dbacks baby!
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tempe/metro Phoenix
Posts: 812
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2007, 12:11 AM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
Another interesting thing is the area increases by about 1,000SF between floor 21 and 23, then decreases by about 600SF again for the top two floors. You can kind of see architectural details that would lend this to happenenig from the rendering... but I kind of thought they had to redesign the building a little bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2007, 12:17 AM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
I think they did have to redesign it a little bit, but that's just it, a little bit. I think it had more to do with the north side wall being too blank, therefore requiring more windows, different shade items, things like that...but not really a redesign of the building in large.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2007, 12:30 AM
sundevilgrad's Avatar
sundevilgrad sundevilgrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 736
That'd be cool to see a ground breaking pretty soon! Hopefully we'll get another tower crane up in month or two...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2007, 3:39 AM
JI5 JI5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Phoenix
Posts: 201
..yeah, because we're about to have NO cranes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.