HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2008, 9:29 AM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Not having LA on there is, IMO, completely unacceptable; which is why suburban nimbyists out here must rewire they're brains.
It would be if there was actually a need for a building that size in LA. That isn't the case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2008, 10:57 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
^ It may only be counting height of the top floor; if so, Waldorf Astoria barely beats the Empire State Building by only 15 ft.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
It would be if there was actually a need for a building that size in LA. That isn't the case.
I completely disagree.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.