HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2021, 9:56 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
Conversely, 5 or 10 condo towers in some Vancouver suburb don't add very much in terms of population density, even if they look nice on the skyline.
That's strange. In this population density map of metro Vancouver the highest densities in the suburbs seem to line up exactly where the highest concentration of towers are. Must be purely a coincidence.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2021, 4:16 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
He's talking about average density, not peaks. And there's some truth to that...how much of the regional population do towers represent, 10%?

Vancouver's UA is nearly twice as dense at DC's and more than twice as dense as Seattle's for example. That's because it's (a) generally pretty compact and (b) has a defined edge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.