HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7181  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 3:31 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,406
^ That looks similar to an apartment building that was recently completed in Palms no?
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7182  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 5:59 PM
losangelesnative's Avatar
losangelesnative losangelesnative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 357
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7183  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 3:42 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by losangelesnative View Post
As an ardent supporter of public transit, I would actually vote NO on this measure under those terms (and I would encourage you guys to do the same). It's better to wait four years and come up with a better plan than to be married to this abomination for 40 years.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7184  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 1:25 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
As an ardent supporter of public transit, I would actually vote NO on this measure under those terms (and I would encourage you guys to do the same). It's better to wait four years and come up with a better plan than to be married to this abomination for 40 years.
I don't know about that, but I don't think this has any chance of passing. Nothing in it to get excited about. The best thing is finishing the purple line early.

I've only skimmed it but don't really have the interest right now to finish. It doesn't seem to make much sense. $425 million for bus rapid transit on Vermont?!? I can only imagine that Measure R is underperforming and these costs are inflated to cover.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7185  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 3:20 PM
cesar90 cesar90 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 433
All of my work (pics&vids) is been while on my bicycle, so I decided to upload some of this,

may do more of this type of videos if you all can suggest or like this one

Let me know

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7186  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 4:22 AM
ConstructDTLA's Avatar
ConstructDTLA ConstructDTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: DTLA
Posts: 1,452
3033 Wilshire Blvd by Hunter, on Flickr

3033 Wilshire Blvd by Hunter, on Flickr
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7187  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 5:06 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,446
Proposed 34-story West LA tower still alive

34-story, 388-foot tall tower planned by Douglas Emmett with 376 apartments. Previously included a retail component, which has been dropped in favor of a 25,000-square-foot park.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7188  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 5:47 PM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,021
That park doesn't look very open to me...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7189  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 8:04 PM
Doctorboffin Doctorboffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 383
Looks alright. Nice to see more green space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7190  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2016, 9:49 PM
losangelesnative's Avatar
losangelesnative losangelesnative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 357
LA City Council just unanimously approved Palladium Project
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7191  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2016, 9:56 PM
SimonLA SimonLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 184
There was supposed to be movement on Hollywood Target at today's council mtg. Anyone have the intel?



http://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/t...facebook-page/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7192  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2016, 3:18 PM
Steve8263's Avatar
Steve8263 Steve8263 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by losangelesnative View Post
LA City Council just unanimously approved Palladium Project
The L.A. Times article called this project "controversial" which is absolutely ridiculous and bad reporting frankly.

Just because a very vocal handful of people with a lot of other people's money are opposed hardly qualifies as controversial.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7193  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2016, 10:26 PM
mbb mbb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve8263 View Post
The L.A. Times article called this project "controversial" which is absolutely ridiculous and bad reporting frankly.

Just because a very vocal handful of people with a lot of other people's money are opposed hardly qualifies as controversial.
Public disagreement is literally the definition of controversial. In this case, I'd say there's objectively no hyperbole from the LA Times due to the use of the word. I'm all for the project and against the bullshit opposition, but it's OK to call it controversial at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7194  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 1:46 PM
Steve8263's Avatar
Steve8263 Steve8263 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbb View Post
Public disagreement is literally the definition of controversial. In this case, I'd say there's objectively no hyperbole from the LA Times due to the use of the word. I'm all for the project and against the bullshit opposition, but it's OK to call it controversial at the same time.
I would not consider literally like 5 people, with some sort of agenda or vendetta, as "public disagreement".

I bet 99.9% of the population either has never heard of this project, has no opinion about it, or is in favor of building it to help clean up the area and cut the housing shortage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7195  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 2:14 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,098
^ I think that's the grassroots message that needs to be put out there when their proposed measure eventually makes it to a ballot (next year?). They've been very good at spinning this as a luxury housing issue, but it's really about their views and assumed traffic impacts (which are also overstated for this specific project).

It's sad, because some of the issues they bring into the fold - specifically the inclusion of affordable housing into the zoning plan and for projects requesting variances or increases in allowing zoning - really should be discussed, but not under the framework of their current proposal.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7196  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 4:20 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,446
Overhead view of Irvine's 400 Spectrum Center

20 stories, 323 feet, 426,000 sq. ft. of office space. Developer is the Irvine Company, architects is Pei Cobb Freed & Partners.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7197  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 4:35 PM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Another residential tower coming to Burbank! And this one is super cool looking! I don't want to write an article though be cause I don't want to inform the NIMBYs. lol



More information: http://www.burbankca.gov/departments...ed-use-project
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7198  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 4:58 PM
Eightball's Avatar
Eightball Eightball is offline
life is good
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: all over
Posts: 2,301
^^^ LOVE that design!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7199  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 7:27 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,446
http://urbanize.la/post/renderings-r...rtment-complex

New renderings for 10601 Washington Boulevard, seven-story development from Greystar currently going up on the Palms-Culver City border. 135 apartments, 14,000 square feet of retail space.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7200  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 11:09 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,098
^ So that's what they're building there! Drove by there the other day and wondered what that was.

I'm digging the Burbank tower as well. Where is that?
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.