Quote:
Originally Posted by mbb
Public disagreement is literally the definition of controversial. In this case, I'd say there's objectively no hyperbole from the LA Times due to the use of the word. I'm all for the project and against the bullshit opposition, but it's OK to call it controversial at the same time.
|
I would not consider literally like 5 people, with some sort of agenda or vendetta, as "public disagreement".
I bet 99.9% of the population either has never heard of this project, has no opinion about it, or is in favor of building it to help clean up the area and cut the housing shortage.