HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2981  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2021, 1:40 PM
cardeza cardeza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoughtcriminal View Post
at 5% population growth per decade, we should get back over 2 million in 50 years.
one would hope the rate increases. DC increased by considerably more and added more residents than Philly in spite of being less than half as populous. Out of the 10 largest cities I think only LA and Chicago grew by smaller %.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2982  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2021, 1:50 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza View Post
one would hope the rate increases. DC increased by considerably more and added more residents than Philly in spite of being less than half as populous. Out of the 10 largest cities I think only LA and Chicago grew by smaller %.
What?? Who cares? Growth is growth. You should be proud of Philly's growth. We don't need to be growing at a fast clip... it's frankly unsustainable in this country because of the sever lack of investment in infrastructure in America. I would rather be growing at a slower but steadier pace, as we have been. It's easier to manage infrastructure improvements in public transit, roads and highways... easier to manage housing affordability, so on and so forth.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2983  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2021, 2:00 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
What?? Who cares? Growth is growth. You should be proud of Philly's growth. We don't need to be growing at a fast clip... it's frankly unsustainable in this country because of the sever lack of investment in infrastructure in America. I would rather be growing at a slower but steadier pace, as we have been. It's easier to manage infrastructure improvements in public transit, roads and highways... easier to manage housing affordability, so on and so forth.
Even still, we should be building for the Philadelphia we want to become, not what we are now.

This is why I’m disappointed by the lack of discussion surrounding rapid transit expansion. If Philly is to remain successful it needs to expand rapid transit.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2984  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2021, 2:29 PM
UrbanRevival UrbanRevival is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza View Post
one would hope the rate increases. DC increased by considerably more and added more residents than Philly in spite of being less than half as populous. Out of the 10 largest cities I think only LA and Chicago grew by smaller %.
DC has always had the innate economic stimulus of being the seat of the federal government. It essentially can grow without even trying for that reason; its growth is tied to that of the nation. It's really an apples-oranges comparison, in my view.

Moreover, very similar to a Boston or San Francisco, the size of DC is really arbitrary. All three are prime examples of smaller cities by land area that anchor a very large MSA or CSA and have surrounding municipalities that are incredibly large/economically robust themselves (i.e., Cambridge/Somerville, Oakland/San Jose and Alexandria/Arlington/Bethesda). A real comparison would take into account the broader urban area of each city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2985  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2021, 2:41 PM
PHL10's Avatar
PHL10 PHL10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza View Post
one would hope the rate increases. DC increased by considerably more and added more residents than Philly in spite of being less than half as populous. Out of the 10 largest cities I think only LA and Chicago grew by smaller %.
....and Detroit shrunk by 10%. We are at our highest population since 1980; nothing to sneeze at. Further, DC has not yet recovered to it's former peak population so in that way, it has a way to go, just like Philadelphia. (Neither has Boston for that matter.)
__________________
I've been living under a rock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2986  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 1:15 AM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanRevival View Post
DC has always had the innate economic stimulus of being the seat of the federal government. It essentially can grow without even trying for that reason; its growth is tied to that of the nation. It's really an apples-oranges comparison, in my view.

Moreover, very similar to a Boston or San Francisco, the size of DC is really arbitrary. All three are prime examples of smaller cities by land area that anchor a very large MSA or CSA and have surrounding municipalities that are incredibly large/economically robust themselves (i.e., Cambridge/Somerville, Oakland/San Jose and Alexandria/Arlington/Bethesda). A real comparison would take into account the broader urban area of each city.
Ya'll act like DC has always been growing. It suffered the same demise as most other cities during the 70s and 80s. I remember going on school trips to DC in the 80s and it was bombed out blocks from the Capitol.

Anyways. We should be proud of our growth. After all the decades of shrinkage, this is a stunning turn around. And us more than anyone can see that the momentum is only continuing to build.

How many people live in a typical Philadelphia neighborhood. 8,000? 10,000? 15,000? The point is, it's not as many people as you think. When you think of adding 80K people, it's sort of like re-populating 6 or 8 or 10 neighborhoods, whichever way you want to think about it.

We will pass 1.7MM in the next census easily.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2987  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 1:44 PM
iamrobk iamrobk is offline
Future World Dictator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown View Post
Ya'll act like DC has always been growing. It suffered the same demise as most other cities during the 70s and 80s. I remember going on school trips to DC in the 80s and it was bombed out blocks from the Capitol.

Anyways. We should be proud of our growth. After all the decades of shrinkage, this is a stunning turn around. And us more than anyone can see that the momentum is only continuing to build.

How many people live in a typical Philadelphia neighborhood. 8,000? 10,000? 15,000? The point is, it's not as many people as you think. When you think of adding 80K people, it's sort of like re-populating 6 or 8 or 10 neighborhoods, whichever way you want to think about it.

We will pass 1.7MM in the next census easily.
My parents lived in DC in the 70's and 80's and my dad still thinks that Capitol Hill is a horrible neighborhood.

The neighborhood thing is a good point - it's a larger neighborhood, but the 19130 zip code (i.e., Fairmount and Francisville) for example has a population of ~25k. So we basically added 3 entire Fairmounts. That's pretty damn good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2988  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 1:50 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamrobk View Post
My parents lived in DC in the 70's and 80's and my dad still thinks that Capitol Hill is a horrible neighborhood.

The neighborhood thing is a good point - it's a larger neighborhood, but the 19130 zip code (i.e., Fairmount and Francisville) for example has a population of ~25k. So we basically added 3 entire Fairmounts. That's pretty damn good.
The last time I checked, despite all the hubbub, Northern Liberties still only had about 8,000 residents. So it's 10 Northern Liberties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2989  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 1:53 PM
cardeza cardeza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
Even still, we should be building for the Philadelphia we want to become, not what we are now.

This is why I’m disappointed by the lack of discussion surrounding rapid transit expansion. If Philly is to remain successful it needs to expand rapid transit.
Any such conversation is a national conversation. Transit is about national funding and prioritization. Philly nor any other city is doing anything major in terms of transit expansion without major federal funding and focus. Its pointless to talk about that in the local context.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2990  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 2:42 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza View Post
Any such conversation is a national conversation. Transit is about national funding and prioritization. Philly nor any other city is doing anything major in terms of transit expansion without major federal funding and focus. Its pointless to talk about that in the local context.
Phoenix is expanding its light rail system.
Denver is building an electric regional rail system from scratch.
LA is extending the Purple Line.
Chicago is extending the Red Line.
NYC has one or two subway extensions being built at any given time.
Honolulu is getting a metro.

It’s not just that there are problems at the federal level (there are, don’t get me wrong), but Philadelphia certainly is being screwed by its state government.

If SEPTA got the money per rider that the CTA or even the MBTA gets, we’d see SEPTA’s backlog of infrastructure upgrades and repairs be cleared, which would allow them to allocate more money towards expansion.

Right now the only proposed expansion of SEPTA’s subways or trolleys is a line serving the suburbs and a 2 mile extension of the BSL south. Neither have started construction nor have either gotten far in the engineering phase.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2991  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 5:18 PM
TonyTone's Avatar
TonyTone TonyTone is offline
Tony V / ValuezTV
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Philly Metro DE-PA-NJ
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamrobk View Post
My parents lived in DC in the 70's and 80's and my dad still thinks that Capitol Hill is a horrible neighborhood.

The neighborhood thing is a good point - it's a larger neighborhood, but the 19130 zip code (i.e., Fairmount and Francisville) for example has a population of ~25k. So we basically added 3 entire Fairmounts. That's pretty damn good.
Whats funny is the suburbs of D.C. has some of the most affluent wealthy black families in the country.
__________________
Promoting Cities since 1998! | ValuezTv | Philadelphia Photo Thread | Wilmington Photo Thread | ValuezTv IG | ValuezTv X
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2992  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 7:20 PM
Radio5 Radio5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
Phoenix is expanding its light rail system.
Denver is building an electric regional rail system from scratch.
LA is extending the Purple Line.
Chicago is extending the Red Line.
NYC has one or two subway extensions being built at any given time.
Honolulu is getting a metro.

It’s not just that there are problems at the federal level (there are, don’t get me wrong), but Philadelphia certainly is being screwed by its state government.

If SEPTA got the money per rider that the CTA or even the MBTA gets, we’d see SEPTA’s backlog of infrastructure upgrades and repairs be cleared, which would allow them to allocate more money towards expansion.

Right now the only proposed expansion of SEPTA’s subways or trolleys is a line serving the suburbs and a 2 mile extension of the BSL south. Neither have started construction nor have either gotten far in the engineering phase.

Agreed. LA alone is expanding 3 lines...purple, green, and gold and putting a new one (crenshaw line) in now, not to mention the LAX people mover. A lot of it paid for by measure M, a tax we imposed on ourselves to help build the system out more quickly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2993  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 3:46 PM
cardeza cardeza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
Phoenix is expanding its light rail system.
Denver is building an electric regional rail system from scratch.
LA is extending the Purple Line.
Chicago is extending the Red Line.
NYC has one or two subway extensions being built at any given time.
Honolulu is getting a metro.

It’s not just that there are problems at the federal level (there are, don’t get me wrong), but Philadelphia certainly is being screwed by its state government.

If SEPTA got the money per rider that the CTA or even the MBTA gets, we’d see SEPTA’s backlog of infrastructure upgrades and repairs be cleared, which would allow them to allocate more money towards expansion.

Right now the only proposed expansion of SEPTA’s subways or trolleys is a line serving the suburbs and a 2 mile extension of the BSL south. Neither have started construction nor have either gotten far in the engineering phase.
The fact that PA doesnt allow regional tax funding for transit projects is a major issue, especially without a federal commitment to transit expansion. In many areas the only way new stuff gets built is if ballot initiatives pass that allow specific regional funding streams to go to transit projects. None of that can happen here.

The BSL extension is dead. K of P is not dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2994  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 6:12 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza View Post
The fact that PA doesnt allow regional tax funding for transit projects is a major issue, especially without a federal commitment to transit expansion. In many areas the only way new stuff gets built is if ballot initiatives pass that allow specific regional funding streams to go to transit projects. None of that can happen here.

The BSL extension is dead. K of P is not dead.
Even if we could fund projects through regional tax funding, it would be useless for Septa. Septa is so embarrassingly underfunded by Harrisburg that they struggle with just the maintaining and running the lines we currently have. Before you even talk about adding lines, you need to dig SEPTA out of the hole they currently exist within.

People will get behind a tax when they know it will do something concrete, when they know there will be a tangible benefit that they will see. When SEPTA is at the point where they have the finances and systems in place to run not just their existing system, but an expanded system, and all they need is some cash for the actual construction of new lines or services, then putting a tax like this on the ballot would make sense. No one is going to vote for a SEPTA tax with nebulous promises of future service additions after they complete needed work that has been delayed by decades of underfunding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2995  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2021, 3:55 AM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
even if we could fund projects through regional tax funding, it would be useless for septa. Septa is so embarrassingly underfunded by harrisburg that they struggle with just the maintaining and running the lines we currently have. Before you even talk about adding lines, you need to dig septa out of the hole they currently exist within.

People will get behind a tax when they know it will do something concrete, when they know there will be a tangible benefit that they will see. When septa is at the point where they have the finances and systems in place to run not just their existing system, but an expanded system, and all they need is some cash for the actual construction of new lines or services, then putting a tax like this on the ballot would make sense. No one is going to vote for a septa tax with nebulous promises of future service additions after they complete needed work that has been delayed by decades of underfunding.
gerrymandering must stop
__________________
Smart Cities
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2996  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2021, 2:45 PM
PHLJD13 PHLJD13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 149
Liberty Place Lighting

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2997  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2021, 4:35 PM
TempleGuy1000 TempleGuy1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLJD13 View Post
Wish the author would have asked about the observation deck. I fear it will not be reopening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2998  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2021, 1:04 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza View Post
The fact that PA doesnt allow regional tax funding for transit projects is a major issue, especially without a federal commitment to transit expansion. In many areas the only way new stuff gets built is if ballot initiatives pass that allow specific regional funding streams to go to transit projects. None of that can happen here.

The BSL extension is dead. K of P is not dead.
KoP is a POS that needs to die ASAP. It is a horrendous project by just about every imaginable metric. I would gladly trade killing KoP dead to resuscitate BSL.
__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2999  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2021, 1:15 PM
PHL10's Avatar
PHL10 PHL10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier View Post
KoP is a POS that needs to die ASAP. It is a horrendous project by just about every imaginable metric. I would gladly trade killing KoP dead to resuscitate BSL.
I'm glad someone said it.
__________________
I've been living under a rock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3000  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2021, 2:45 PM
Mark in Mount Airy Mark in Mount Airy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHL10 View Post
I'm glad someone said it.
While I wholeheartedly support the BSL extension to the Navy Yard and ultimately the airport, the KofP extension isn't wrongheaded. There are three huge employment centers in the Philadelphia region and one of them is not reachable by rail/subway. I want working class folks who live within the city to be able to more easily commute to jobs in KofP than they can now.

While we are on the subject, the City needs to put a lot more money into SEPTA as well. We have a City Council that has always prioritized spending money on people -- who can move across City Avenue -- then on than the physical assets of the city which cannot. It steams me that City Council underfunds SEPTA and the parks system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:02 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.