HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #541  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2008, 4:24 AM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by newflyer View Post
That may be ... since I am still restricted by certain obligations here in Calgary, but I hope to get back as soon as possible.
Aww that was quick im already back in Saskatchewan. lol

edit..

You have to try out the heated bus shacks i burnt my ass on the seat it was so warm, then another day saw homeless people sleeping in them .lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #542  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2008, 5:12 AM
newflyer's Avatar
newflyer newflyer is offline
Capitalist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayM View Post
Aww that was quick im already back in Saskatchewan. lol

edit..

You have to try out the heated bus shacks i burnt my ass on the seat it was so warm, then another day saw homeless people sleeping in them .lol
Sounds like ski pants .. and some piped in classical music would be in order.
__________________
Check out my city at
http://www.allwinnipeg.com **More than Ever**
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #543  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2008, 12:46 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by newflyer View Post
Here is an example of what I saw on my recent trip to Singapore:

My wife and I had breakfast (before the zoo opened) with her and my wife got called up to be the helper...pretty neat times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #544  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2008, 4:31 AM
newflyer's Avatar
newflyer newflyer is offline
Capitalist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,086
The Oracle Of Manitoba
Matthew Schifrin 06.16.08, 12:00 AM ET


Armchair Guru
The Oracle Of Manitoba
Matthew Schifrin 06.16.08, 12:00 AM ET


Randolph McDuff may be the best stock picker the world has never heard of
"Discipline" and "patience" are probably the two most valuable words in value investing. It stands to reason, then, that few places would serve as better incubators for a value investor than The Pas, in Manitoba. Close to polar bear country, where Hudson Bay winds chill the air to 40 degrees below zero and the wait for spring lasts eight months, The Pas is the hometown of Randolph McDuff, a stock picker with an astounding record.

Since McDuff began running his RMG ValueCatalyst small-company fund eight years ago, he has earned a compound annual return of 36.4%. Not a single diversified stock fund in Lipper Analytical's universe of 1,555 mutual funds can match that. Ken Heebner's CGM Focus Fund comes closest at 32.2% a year over the same period. McDuff's RMG Value Oriented Growth, which buys large companies like Bayer and Fresenius Medical, comes in third at 25.5%. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has returned a compound annual 11% over that period; the s&p 500, 1.1% (including dividends).

What's McDuff's secret? "The [securities] industry rewards analysts for boring, homogenous work and penalizes those who provide truly insightful views," he says. "I typically own companies the industry doesn't cover, covers poorly or covers with largely plagiarized reports."

For anyone who likes McDuff's perspective, and track record, the bad news is that you can't hitch a ride directly on RMG ValueCatalyst because it's a mutual fund on paper only. McDuff set up the simulation on the investing Web site Marketocracy.com, where his results are monitored and he is ranked number one among 70,000 managers. If you want to play along and have at least $50,000 to invest, Marketocracy Capital Management will mimic McDuff's portfolio for a fee of 1.9% of assets a year.

Now living in Winnipeg with his wife, Bridget, McDuff picks stocks with a desktop computer and online brokerage account--plus the heavy research he learned to do growing up. "Because it's so damn cold in The Pas, there was nothing to do but read," says McDuff, 43. "I'd spend hours at the library reading financial periodicals."

McDuff was always drawn more to the challenge of investing than to the trappings of high finance. After graduating from the University of Manitoba with an economics degree in 1986, he spent 14 years as a stockbroker with Bank of Montreal's BMO Nesbitt Burns. By 2000 he'd saved $2 million and decided it was enough. He quit his job at age 37 to try managing money--his own and the virtual kind.

"While my colleagues were living the high life, I was saving," McDuff says, "still driving my 1991 Toyota 4Runner and living in my $150,000 house."

To learn if he had what it took to manage a mutual fund, McDuff signed up with Marketocracy.com. It is one of a score of sites that monitor members' stock picking prowess (another is run by Forbes.com and affiliate Investopedia at http://stocks.forbes.com).

It's American Idol for stock buffs. Some of these sites, like Motley Fool's Caps and TheStreet.com's Stockpickr, help members select stocks and share ideas. Covestor and Cake Financial tap into brokerage records, monitor performance and may soon charge members to look over the shoulders of their savviest peers.

Marketocracy.com launched in 2000 to find the best stock pickers and turn them into real money managers. It's one of the oldest stock picking sites around, meaning its members have some of the longest verifiable track records.

McDuff joined in July 2000, less than a month after Marketocracy.com started up, and just as tech stocks were melting down. He created large- and small-cap funds seeded with $1 million each in virtual money. Separately, he has invested his own savings in all his virtual picks.

The value Marketocracy.com's simulation adds is in exposing would-be money managers to the rigors of running a real mutual fund. Participants must declare a fund objective and avoid style drift or overconcentration in a few stocks, either of which can get a manager disqualified.

As a value manager, McDuff has a strategy best described as Warren Buffett meets Sir John Templeton. Like Buffett, McDuff looks for high operating profit margins (Ebitda divided by sales), a strong balance sheet and market power (monopoly or duopoly). Like Templeton, McDuff looks far and wide for firms that fit this bill but are also still cheap.

To McDuff, cheap means having a lower enterprise ratio than competitors. That ratio is the enterprise value (market capitalization plus debt minus cash) divided by operating income (in the sense of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Analysts use the ratio under the column heading ev/Ebitda. McDuff says it beats the classic price/earnings ratio because it captures an element of balance-sheet health.

Before buying a stock, McDuff writes up a 1,000- to 2,000-word thesis on why it's a buy and shares it on a few investing Web sites. "It's very cathartic," he says.

McDuff scored big early BPZ Resources. Other winners include MasterCard and diabetes care specialist Novo Nordisk.

Seven months ago McDuff began buying Nestlé. Last year the Swiss food purveyor (Perrier, Purina, Carnation) spent $9.5 billion on major acquisitions without even consuming its net income (which was $10.4 billion). Despite that, and a $195 billion market value, Nestlé trades in the U.S. on the microcap-heavy Pink Sheets. A mere three North American analysts cover the firm. Rival Pepsi, one-third the size, is followed by 17. McDuff likes that Nestlé's managers seem to be in business to enrich the owners rather than themselves. "Senior management, including directors, took home $49 million last year," McDuff says. "That's about half what Pepsi's management was paid."



McDuff scouts for overlooked sectors, too, and is big on airports. Since airport privatization is still a foreign concept, airports are mostly ignored here, he says.

"The revenue streams are the stuff that most commercial real estate investors would kill to earn," says his investment thesis. "Charges include departure taxes, landing fees, baggage-handling fees and aircraft fuelling costs. ... Almost everyone who visits an airport pays some sort of fee. It's not unusual for them to have [operating] margins of 60% to 70%."

McDuff's favorite is Beijing Capital International Airport. North Americans have missed this one in part because it trades like a penny stock, at $1.08 a share over the counter. Yet with four billion shares out, its value exceeds $4 billion. Revenues have grown 14% annually since 2000. Last year it reported $500 million in revenue and $315 million in cash flow (in the sense of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Those numbers will go up. Beijing just completed Terminal 3, the world's largest. Fast-rising revenues and an enterprise ratio of 15 tell McDuff that the shares will take off. He also likes Mexico's Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

For all his worldly success investing, McDuff says he's happy making enough to live comfortably. Marketocracy.com passes on to McDuff a cut of the fees it earns from his portfolio. McDuff donates the proceeds ($1,000 in the last quarter) to the charity American Water Relief.

Source: Forbes.com
__________________
Check out my city at
http://www.allwinnipeg.com **More than Ever**

Last edited by newflyer; Jun 8, 2008 at 4:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #545  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2008, 6:46 PM
newflyer's Avatar
newflyer newflyer is offline
Capitalist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,086
Doer, business to plan pitch for inland-port funding for city
Updated: June 8 at 12:15 AM CDT

The Doer government and Manitoba business will hold a summit Tuesday to look at how the province can get its hands on some of the nearly $1 billion in federal funding so it can develop Winnipeg as an inland port to the rest of the continent.

The Premier's Economic Advisory Council, made up of local business leaders, will host the brainstorming session to pick out priorities to make a co-ordinated pitch for federal funding.

The session will be held shortly after Doer returns from a three-day trade mission to Mexico to firm up ties with Mexican officials and U.S. business leaders.

Deputy Premier Rosann Wowchuk said Doer met Thursday with the Mexican government's minister of foreign affairs to discuss trade issues and that his meetings are aimed at promoting the city as an inland port. She said about 400 business leaders from across the continent are at the meeting.

But Tory Leader Hugh McFadyen said reports from the trade meetings indicate not much is happening and Doer is playing an insignificant role.

"We need to get our elbows up in this fight," McFadyen said last week. McFadyen said Winnipeg's reputation as a rail, air and highway hub could be threatened by lobbying efforts of Saskatchewan and Alberta.

Both provinces are pushing Ottawa hard for a big share of the $997 million the Harper government has earmarked for a Canadian trade and transportation network linking Vancouver's port to American and Mexican markets.


"If economics and common sense are the drivers of the decision, we'll get it in Winnipeg, but the premier even acknowledged that we'd run the risk of being out-lobbied on it if politics gets in the way," McFadyen said.

There is already a flurry of ideas to bolster Winnipeg's inland port -- better roads, improvements to the Port of Churchill and a container shipment centre at the Winnipeg airport.

Source: Winnipeg Free Press
__________________
Check out my city at
http://www.allwinnipeg.com **More than Ever**
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #546  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2008, 6:03 PM
Tower Crane's Avatar
Tower Crane Tower Crane is offline
ABOVE people like you
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 343
Port Alberta in the works

Winnipeg better get on with the Inland port before Alberta pulls the carpet out from under them. Winnipeg has talked about this for 20 years now, it's nothing new.
Edmonton is on the fast track to setting up Port Alberta as Prince Rupert now has a full blown port and the highway leads right to Edmonton, Port Alberta is a project by Edmonton International Airport in Edmonton which will combine air, rail, and road transportation infrastructure at a single point. Building of dedicated new 13,000 square metre cargo apron began in 2007. Development for another 12.14 km² is planned to begin in 2008.
I see a lot of long distance trucking companies setting up shop here possibly in anticipation of this happening.

Port Alberta Funding to Build Blueprint for the Future
March 20, 2008 Edmonton, Alberta

The Government of Canada is investing in the development of a strategic plan to help position Port Alberta as a major North American inland trade and transportation hub.

The Honourable Rona Ambrose, President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister of Western Economic Diversification, announced federal funding of $1.5 million toward the plan today.

"This investment marks an important step toward building the foundation needed to make Port Alberta a reality and success," said Minister Ambrose. "This investment will help develop a blueprint that will bring the Port Alberta concept to life and create an industry-led council to provide leadership for the initiative."

Port Alberta has the potential to transform Edmonton Region into a major North American warehousing and distribution hub that combines air, rail and road transportation infrastructure with links to Asia and the United States.

"Edmonton is a key inland staging area for trade between Asia and North America, so investing in Port Alberta is an investment in the future of the Edmonton Region," said Edmonton Mayor Stephen Mandel. "As the global port to the oilsands, Edmonton's future as an inland port is key to Canada's economic prosperity."

The funding from Western Economic Diversification Canada will support the building blocks of research, partnership and plans that will contribute to developing a strong and vibrant Port Alberta. The project will identify opportunities for Port Alberta, determine the economic impact and develop an action plan to ensure established targets are met.

"This new funding is vital to developing Port Alberta and positioning Edmonton International Airport, as part of this vital regional initiative, to become a major cargo processing centre, capable of hosting multiple modes of transportation and acting as a catalyst for advancing global trade and distribution across the region," said Reg Milley, President and CEO of Edmonton Airports. "Onsite warehouse and logistics facilities will serve North America's growing trade through NAFTA and with Asia and Europe."

Western Canada and Alberta are well positioned-both geographically and economically-to take advantage of changing dynamics in the global economy. The Edmonton region, in particular, has the potential to become a major North American trade and transportation hub between Asia and North America.

"Alberta's business environment just got better," said Martin Salloum, President and CEO of the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce. "In an ever-changing global environment, the communities that will survive over the long run are those that can effectively work together towards a common goal. Twenty years from now, residents of the Edmonton Capital Region will see a more diverse, dynamic economy thanks in part to the Port Alberta partnership and the investment made today by the Government of Canada."

Efforts to develop Port Alberta were initiated by Edmonton Airports in June 2006. Along with the Airport, the Edmonton Economic Development Corporation and the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce have formed a partnership to champion and direct the initiative. The City of Edmonton has also been a strong advocate for Port Alberta.

"Alberta's vibrant economic growth is based on efficient access to North American and world markets," said Ron Gilbertson, president and CEO of Edmonton Economic Development Corporation. "Port Alberta will coordinate a strategy to optimize Greater Edmonton's road, rail and runway infrastructure so local industry can maximize growth internationally with new export and back-haul opportunities with Asian markets as well as service vital regional markets in Northern Alberta and the far North. Port Alberta will play a vital role in supporting the growth of companies currently in our region and attracting the firms necessary to help support and sustain our ongoing economic growth."

Winnipeg or Edmonton..........I'd hate to be number 2 in this race.

Last edited by Tower Crane; Jun 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #547  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2008, 10:16 PM
ILYR's Avatar
ILYR ILYR is offline
ILYR
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower Crane View Post
Winnipeg better get on with the Inland port before Alberta pulls the carpet out from under them. Winnipeg has talked about this for 20 years now, it's nothing new.
Edmonton is on the fast track to setting up Port Alberta as Prince Rupert now has a full blown port and the highway leads right to Edmonton, Port Alberta is a project by Edmonton International Airport in Edmonton which will combine air, rail, and road transportation infrastructure at a single point. Building of dedicated new 13,000 square metre cargo apron began in 2007. Development for another 12.14 km² is planned to begin in 2008.
I see a lot of long distance trucking companies setting up shop here possibly in anticipation of this happening.

Winnipeg or Edmonton..........I'd hate to be number 2 in this race.
True Edmonton is setting its self up to be a major hub and the port in Prince Rupert is definately an advantage. However, winnipeg has done much more that just talk in the last 20 years. There has been a great deal of progress on this front, for example the Mid-Continent Trade Corridor, of which Winnipeg is a major player (Major links all through the US and down to Mexico). Major changes at Winnipeg airport have already happend and the airport is the 3rd largest in Canada with respect to cargo tonnage (major hub for cargojet and Purolator). Links with major trucking (many being based in the city) and rail (CN, CP, BNSF all go through Winnipeg) have already been integrated, with links north, south, east and west. And don't foget there is a major shipping port in Churchill, Manitoba (open half the year now, but that season is growing). I would say the Winnipeg is well positioned to challange Edmonton in this respect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #548  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2008, 10:22 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
untill we rebuild the rail line between lake winnipeg and manitoba the port in churchill is not much of an advantage...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #549  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2008, 6:06 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,231



The Doer government and Manitoba business leaders vowed today to push ahead with developing Winnipeg as an inland port -- a place goods from around the world can arrive by air, truck or rail and shipped throughout the continent.

Premier Gary Doer and Mayor Sam Katz met this morning with the Doer's Economic Advisory Council to examine how to tap into nearly $1 billion in federal funding to make it happen.

Doer and Katz said the next step is convincing Ottawa that Winnipeg is the best place for an inland port over other Canadian cities vying for the same designation and same pot of federal money.

Plans are on the drawing board to expand trucking routes for quicker access to the airport and rail distribution areas, Doer said. These include twinning Inkster Boulevard to the west Perimeter Highway, improving access to the city via the Trans Canada at Headingley and dealing with the bottleneck on Highway 75 as it comes up through St. Norbert.

Also in the planning stage is working with the outlying municipalities to west of the airport so that the area is developed as a distribution centre.

Katz said the issue is important for the city's economic future and growth that government will move quickly on it.

"Speed is everything when it comes to transportation," he said.

The session today was held shortly after Doer returned from a three-day trade mission to Mexico to firm up ties with Mexican officials and U.S. business leaders.

bruce.owen@freepress.mb.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #550  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2008, 9:50 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
MTS Centre; Booming Business
CJOB's Lorne Edwards reporting
6/10/2008

The MTS Centre is still one busy place.

Today you heard about Elton John coming to Winnipeg this September. Monday night it was Iron Maiden.

The MTS Centre has essentially held an average of one event every other night since it opened. From June 2007 to this month, the facility hosted 165 events, up from 144 in 2006.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #551  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2008, 10:16 PM
bomberguy's Avatar
bomberguy bomberguy is offline
GQMF
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 656
Should've made the MTS Centre bigger.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #552  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2008, 10:19 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
.. in the summer time we should have these concerts at portage and main not inside!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #553  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 3:52 AM
Boreal's Avatar
Boreal Boreal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,699
Adrian - a local group brought Sean Paul to the Scotia Bank Stage 2 years ago, and although he was very good if not great, the concert as a whole (venue, display, accessibility, etc.) was exceptionally poor. I don't endorse any outdoor concert, unless perhaps something can be done at Canad Inns, but even then, the acoustics I imagine would be sub-par at best.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #554  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 4:08 AM
Greco Roman Greco Roman is offline
Movin' on up
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags_in_the_peg View Post



The Doer government and Manitoba business leaders vowed today to push ahead with developing Winnipeg as an inland port -- a place goods from around the world can arrive by air, truck or rail and shipped throughout the continent.

Premier Gary Doer and Mayor Sam Katz met this morning with the Doer's Economic Advisory Council to examine how to tap into nearly $1 billion in federal funding to make it happen.

Doer and Katz said the next step is convincing Ottawa that Winnipeg is the best place for an inland port over other Canadian cities vying for the same designation and same pot of federal money.

Plans are on the drawing board to expand trucking routes for quicker access to the airport and rail distribution areas, Doer said. These include twinning Inkster Boulevard to the west Perimeter Highway, improving access to the city via the Trans Canada at Headingley and dealing with the bottleneck on Highway 75 as it comes up through St. Norbert.

Also in the planning stage is working with the outlying municipalities to west of the airport so that the area is developed as a distribution centre.

Katz said the issue is important for the city's economic future and growth that government will move quickly on it.

"Speed is everything when it comes to transportation," he said.

The session today was held shortly after Doer returned from a three-day trade mission to Mexico to firm up ties with Mexican officials and U.S. business leaders.

bruce.owen@freepress.mb.ca
Doer and Katz talk a big talk, but that is all they seem to do when it comes to anything "progressive". Let's just wait and see how much effort they really put into this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #555  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 4:14 AM
Tower Crane's Avatar
Tower Crane Tower Crane is offline
ABOVE people like you
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 343
Winn-Port or Port Alberta?

[QUOTE=wags_in_the_peg;3604765]


Sorry Wags but I have seen a version of this map for the past 20 years. I have seen it be discussed then poof gone for another 5 years and then see it repeat itself. See my earlier post on Port Alberta and the government involvement, you can also find the exact same type of map except as Edmonton as the Hub.
I believe that only one of these ports will happen, I'm really not sure that Winn-port can get everything required together before Port Alberta who is and are already advancing.
Who will become the inland Port?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #556  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 4:33 AM
Greco Roman Greco Roman is offline
Movin' on up
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,449
Logically, Winnipeg makes the most sense out of any. It is located in such a strategic geographic position with easy access to Vancouver, Thunder Bay, Churchill and very central to the US. It just doesn't get any more convenient than this and we need to take advange of it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #557  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 4:45 AM
Tower Crane's Avatar
Tower Crane Tower Crane is offline
ABOVE people like you
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco Roman View Post
Logically, Winnipeg makes the most sense out of any. It is located in such a strategic geographic position with easy access to Vancouver, Thunder Bay, Churchill and very central to the US. It just doesn't get any more convenient than this and we need to take advange of it!
Prince Rupert has opened a modern year round container shipping terminal and I think that gives Port Alberta the big advantage. Churchill is still only a dream and would only open for few months which probably makes it unviable.
I agree Winnipeg is more central and would seem to make more sense I just see the infrastructure being put into place to make Edmonton that centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #558  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 8:58 PM
ILYR's Avatar
ILYR ILYR is offline
ILYR
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower Crane View Post
Churchill is still only a dream and would only open for few months which probably makes it unviable.
Details on the Churchill port:
(taken from http://www.portofchurchill.ca/)

- Canada's only Arctic seaport.
- The Port of Churchill offers four berths for the loading and unloading of grain, general cargo, and tanker vessels. The Port can efficiently load Panamax size vessels.
- Located at the Port is a 140,000-tonne elevator, with the ability to unload over 100 rail cars per day and load over 1,200 MT per hour into vessels.
- The current shipping season runs from mid-July to the beginning of November (3-4 months). The use of icebreakers could significantly lengthen the shipping season.

The short season is a factor for Churchill, but it is by no means a "dream".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #559  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 9:03 PM
ILYR's Avatar
ILYR ILYR is offline
ILYR
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower Crane View Post
Prince Rupert has opened a modern year round container shipping terminal and I think that gives Port Alberta the big advantage. Churchill is still only a dream and would only open for few months which probably makes it unviable.
I agree Winnipeg is more central and would seem to make more sense I just see the infrastructure being put into place to make Edmonton that centre.
I agree that Prince Rupert is an advantage as it is year round. So advantage Edmonton on the shipping port, but Winnipeg has better road/trucking (e.g. Mid-Continent Trade Corridor, of which Winnipeg is a major player and has in place major links all through the US and down to Mexico). and rail links (CN, CP, BNSF all go through Winnipeg) and is more central. I have also noted in a previous post the airport has made major steps to become Canada's 3rd largest cargo airport by tonnage (major hub for cargojet and Purolator).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #560  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2008, 8:49 PM
newflyer's Avatar
newflyer newflyer is offline
Capitalist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower Crane View Post
Prince Rupert has opened a modern year round container shipping terminal and I think that gives Port Alberta the big advantage. Churchill is still only a dream and would only open for few months which probably makes it unviable.
I agree Winnipeg is more central and would seem to make more sense I just see the infrastructure being put into place to make Edmonton that centre.
Port Rupert is a nice addition to Canada's shipping capacity, but it does not have the direct access to the US mid-west and Eastern Continent, who desire the most effiecient and cost beneficial route. Winnipeg already has direct rail links to the US midest regions. The Port of Churchill is significantly cheaper, and closer to Asian ports, than any Port on the West coast. It removes the costly land transportation over the rocky mountains and with the warming of artic waters, Churchill will seeing an ever increasing shipping season.

The Winnipeg to Asia route is not only being pushed by Doer and Katz, it is seen as a cost benefit to transportaion organizations. As was the case at the recent Transport meetings in Mexico. Mexico, the US and Canada want to maximize economic effiency when it comes to global trade. In fact this has already attracted the attention of many anti-trade groups, who fear it will lead to an ever expanded super-interstate highway linking Winnipeg from Mexico and through the contental US. While this level of vision is far away from todays reality, it has come to the full attention to those with interest in creating greater access to Asian markets that the Winnipeg hub would balance the field with those markets on the other side (West) of the Rockies.

This does not even take the Euro link into consideration. The Port of Churchill is also closer to European ports than the St.Laurance Seaway.

While Alberta becoming some sort of the inland port region is a nice fantacy, as a means to add much needed diversification, the reality is Alberta is far away from any major populated areas on the east side of the rockies. Added to the fact the BC is just as capable of handling the volume of shipping to there own sea ports, and adding some sort of inland port on th other side of the transportation obsrutcion known as the Rocky Mountans makes little to no sense from an economic point of view.

If I were to lay a bet .. I would say Winnipeg will see significant inland development over the coming years. Winnipeg will reassume its roll as the major transportation link.
__________________
Check out my city at
http://www.allwinnipeg.com **More than Ever**
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.