HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 12:05 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,889
Naming Rights as a Revenue Tool for Transit

There are many sports venues that sell naming rights to generate revenue. Transit agencies and municipalities also have an opportunity to do the same to increase the quality of service and attract new riders. The naming rights can be for routes, stations, a particular part of the network, or even for the entire system.

For example, TTC (Toronto Transit Commission) can become TD Transit (Toronto-Dominion Transit), and the logo can be changed to green square to match with TD Bank. Alternatively, the naming right could be just for the subway system, the TTC Subway becoming the TD Subway.

There are many other opportunities. TTC bus route 7 Bathurst being renamed 7 Up is another obvious fit. The 41 Keele bus serves a Walmart Supercentre, that is an excellent opportunity to get Walmart to become a sponsor. Of course, 41 Walmart servicing Keele Street might be confusing to riders, so the street can also be sponsored be renamed to Walmart Street as well. Bathurst Street would become Up Street.

The sponsorship doesn't have even to come from a major international corporation. For example, there is a Valumart directly beside Woodbine subway station, which can be sponsored by them and renamed to Valumart Station without causing any confusion riders. It might actually make it easier for riders if they already know where the Valumart is.

Either way, whether from increased revenue and resulting service increase, or from improved wayfinding, corporate sponsorships and naming rights have opportunity to greatly improve the experience of transit users and lure potential users onto the system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 12:09 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,053
Or we could just all die
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 12:18 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Or we could just all die


Next station, Frito-Lay Doritos Xtreme Fajitas Concourse at the Mountain Dew Baja Blast station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 1:33 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by llamaorama View Post


Next station, Frito-Lay Doritos Xtreme Fajitas Concourse at the Mountain Dew Baja Blast station.
Welcome to Metro, I love you.

Now arriving at Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 2:15 AM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is online now
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,473
This comes up from time to time. The issue is, the entire point of urban names is that their permanence is what gives them power & value as a tool for both orientation and marketing. They lose that value if you change them more often than about once every 40 years.

Therein lies the problem. Corporate sponsorships are fickle. They come & go every couple of years. If you start renaming too many things in your city every couple of years, the names very quickly lose their value, and you're worse off than before. Nobody will pay for it, and you've destroyed the power of names in your city for a generation at least.

So you can do naming rights on a very tiny handful of extremely famous destinations. Stadiums are fine because any region is only going to have a couple of huge stadiums, so their name is actually not that important (people will know them as "whatever we're calling the gigantic stadium this year"). But that doesn't work for mundane things like streets, transit stops, neighborhoods, etc, because those types of places do actually need unique and reasonably permanent identifiers. The value of their names plummets to worthlessness if it isn't unique and reasonably permanent.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 2:57 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
The issue is, the entire point of urban names is that their permanence is what gives them power & value as a tool for both orientation and marketing. They lose that value if you change them more often than about once every 40 years.
Sears Tower is still Sears Tower.

Go fuck yourself, Willis!
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 3:53 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,207
It's June 1, not April 1.

But I say we name roads and highways for corporate sponsors prior to transit stations. I-55 can be renamed to the Federal Expressway after FedEx.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 6:06 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,321
Why not sell the naming rights to the interstate highways? To the states? To cities? To the rivers and mountains and parks?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 1:12 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,053
Or to peoples names? Why have a traditional name when you can be corporate sponsored? I have first dibs on Amazon 123456789
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 1:18 PM
thoughtcriminal thoughtcriminal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 506
We have this to an extent in Philly. NRG energy company bought the naming rights to the subway station at the stadium district, so that's called NRG station. Before that, it was AT&T station. Penn Medicine bought the naming rights to the regional rail station at their campus, next to Franklin Field. The subway station at 30th street station is now Drexel station, as it is near Drexel University's campus (not the magnificent 1930 McKim, Mead, and White station, but the subway station adjacent to it.) Penn and Drexel's campuses are adjacent to each other in West Philly. Both are long term institutions that aren't going anywhere, so it makes sense for them to name transit stations at their campuses after them, for a nice fee. And of course, there's Wawa station, on the Media/Wawa regional rail line.
People freaked out a bit when SEPTA started doing this, but if it's done right, people get used to it and it's no big deal. It makes sense as a revenue source as long as it doesn't cause too much confusion and the name doesn't change too often. If they get like a 10 year or more term, that's long enough that most people are fine with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 4:06 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoughtcriminal View Post
People freaked out a bit when SEPTA started doing this, but if it's done right, people get used to it and it's no big deal.

Except it's never okay. Even the naming of art museums and college buildings for donors is super-sleazy.

"And you can thank the wanking eighties, if you wish, and digital sequencers, too, for proving to everyone that technologically "perfect" rock--like "free" jazz--sucks rockets. Because order sucks. I mean, look at the Stones. Keith Richards is always on top of the beat, and Bill Wyman, until he quit, was always behind it, because Richards is leading the band and Charlie Watts is listening to him and Wyman is listening to Watts. So the beat is sliding on those tiny neural lapses, not so you can tell, of course, but so you can feel it in your stomach. And the intonation is wavering, too, with the pulse in the finger on the amplified string. This is the delicacy of rock-and-roll, the bodily rhetoric of tiny increments, necessary imperfections, and contingent community. And it has its virtues, because jazz only works if we're trying to be free and are, in fact, together. Rock-and-roll works because we're all a bunch of flakes. That's something you can depend on, and a good thing too, because in the twentieth century, that's all there is: jazz and rock-and-roll. The rest is term papers and advertising.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 4:43 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,030
If I was a company, would I even WANT naming rights? Would I be blamed for how dirty the station is, or when the train is late? People think more about stuff that pisses them off than they do about things that quietly work well.

The Philly idea sounds terrible. Unless the sponsor IS the neighborhood, like a university, then any sponsor name for a station just causes confusion.

I could see cleaning and station amenities provided by a sponsor however. They get to advertise, we get bathrooms. But the station is still called Main Street. (Not security, which needs to be a public function and it'll lead to controvery anyway.)

Stadiums, btw, get a lot of money because their names get broadcast to millions of people across the country and sometimes the world. Transit system sponsors would mostly hit locals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 5:54 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,332
Detroit already did this with the QLine:

Quote:
Rocket Mortgage (then known as Quicken Loans) bought the naming rights to the line, and announced the name in March 2016.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QLine
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 6:53 PM
ColDayMan's Avatar
ColDayMan ColDayMan is offline
B!tchslapping Since 1999
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus
Posts: 20,030
Conversely, Cincinnati HAD the Cincinnati Bell Connector -- naming rights ended in 2022 -- and is now simply known as The Connector.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connector_(Cincinnati)
__________________
Click the x: _ _ X _ _!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 7:50 PM
wanderer34 wanderer34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami/somewhere in paradise
Posts: 1,559
Naming right for train stations and transit systems are pretty iffy, if you ask me. SEPTA is the worst offender in this regard. For the many stations that have naming rights (Jefferson Station, NRG, Temple, Drexel), I could see Temple and Drexel getting away with this since their campuses are close to the stations. There's really no Jefferson campus close to the former Market East, so renaming Market East Jefferson station has always been a head scratcher, but I live for the day when NRG (formerly AT&T station), can reuse it's Pattison name again, or use the NRG logo aside the Pattison name, since there's no NRG Ave in Philly, but a Pattison Ave exists. And if the naming rights is working, where's the improved quality, and what about the subway and regional rail expansions? If anything, I don't see it as increased revenue, but just another way to line the pockets of a few executives!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2024, 8:44 PM
thoughtcriminal thoughtcriminal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderer34 View Post
There's really no Jefferson campus close to the former Market East, so renaming Market East Jefferson station has always been a head scratcher,
Jefferson Hospital is less than 2 blocks away, at 11th and Walnut. Plus the Jefferson Tower at 11th and Market, practically on top of the station


Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderer34 View Post
And if the naming rights is working, where's the improved quality, and what about the subway and regional rail expansions? If anything, I don't see it as increased revenue, but just another way to line the pockets of a few executives!
Please. Septa might be closing a few funding gaps by selling some naming rights, but no one is getting rich from this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:11 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.