Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando
/\/\/\
/\/\/\
I do know that the typical SLC Design Standards prohibit the ramped side of the garage to be exposed to a public street like that. I also believe there are other requirements that require it to be screened, etc.
However, it looks like those requirements are not required in the D-1 zone. ??! I have no idea why SLC would not want those requirements for the D-1 zone also.
See 21A.37.060 Table D
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/code...ut/0-0-0-68150
|
I think we should apply these standards to all parking structures in the D-Zones, but in particular any that would be 'visible from a street' not just fronting a street.
For example, one of my main issues for 150 S Main as proposed is that the exposed parking garage would be very visible from West Temple, especially with the little RMP building and the park basically permanently preserving that view.
These changes need to be made NOW, if the City wants to avoid basically every major structure that gets proposed in the city potentially having a hideous exposed parking structure at the base of it. Especially because these towers will likely remain for around 50-100 years at this point.
I wouldn't be shocked if the final Sundial design removes the cladding for 8 or so floors of parking and leave it exposed at this point too. Due to 'market conditions' and 'cost savings.'
If Downtown Salt Lake City wants to be taken seriously by developers and architects and be seen as more than just a third rate city that will allow basically anything to be built no matter how crappy the design, serious changes need to start to be made this year. We need to take advantage of this slowdown to start implementing real changes to code and design requirements (including greater requirements for public art (not just murals) and public spaces from developers). Otherwise when the market improves again we will likely be stuck with bad design for a century to come.
I've seriously done a 180 in my thinking on a lot of this. For the most part, I have been personally very accommodating to developers back when the Salt Lake City was basically begging for projects to come to the city. I would bend over backwards on this forum explaining why it was too difficult for developers to add retail in a sketchy neighborhood or that it was too much to ask for street engagement when only one developer wanted to build in Ballpark or North Temple or by the Gateway.
Now, with well over a hundred active major projects in Salt Lake, I think we are beyond the point when we can start demanding much higher quality from builders. The fact that some developers, such as Urban Alfandre and Lowe Property Group are able to build high quality designs and still make a profit proves that it can be done here. All the whining and saying 'it can't be done' continues to be proven false and I've grown sick of bad developers' excuses.
The message from Salt Lake City from now on needs to be clear: build it right, or don't build at all.
Sorry, minor rant over.