HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2015, 10:28 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 1,715
Well don't forget that the building still has a crown (the empty box at it's very top), so that should give it a little more height
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2015, 10:45 PM
go go white sox go go white sox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
They want to break ground by June or July.

It looks like the height has gone to 810' to the underside of the top floor.
Wow great news Chicago on a roll. Now if we can get jahn moving and approved that would be great!
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2015, 6:21 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,392
Wow, very aggressive schedule on this one, 810' to the bottom of the top floor means total height in the mid 800' range. Should help distract from OMP and it's even more heinous sibling OMPW. Can't wait to see cranes rising around Grant Park again! Sounds like next year is 2005 or 2006.
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2015, 9:54 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 26,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
810' to the bottom of the top floor means total height in the mid 800' range.
yeah, that's what i'm guessing too. that's why i'm leaving the 862' figure in the title until we get better info on exactly where this on tops out.

"bottom of the top floor" is a weird, and i would argue often useless, figure when talking about building heights. why is it considered important enough to be mentioned in these plan commission meetings?
__________________
"every time a strip mall dies, an angel gets its wings"
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2015, 11:59 PM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,563
Is the next step filing for permits, or is there more to be done?
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 2:37 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian_b View Post
Is the next step filing for permits, or is there more to be done?
Zoning approvals and City Council approvals.

Filing for permits and securing financing.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2015, 8:51 AM
andydie's Avatar
andydie andydie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 587
great news for chicago. i wonder tho were both towers approved and which of the pair will rise first the smaller or the larger of the two?
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2015, 12:17 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by andydie View Post
great news for chicago. i wonder tho were both towers approved and which of the pair will rise first the smaller or the larger of the two?
The east (shorter) tower was the one approved and will be constructed first. There's no timeframe for Phase II that I'm aware of.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2015, 3:42 PM
go go white sox go go white sox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
The east (shorter) tower was the one approved and will be constructed first. There's no timeframe for Phase II that I'm aware of.
Any idea of the height of the second proposed tower?
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2015, 4:48 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by go go white sox View Post
Any idea of the height of the second proposed tower?
No... Perhaps about 100' taller.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 4:59 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,971
Yeah... We're going to have to see some official blueprints as the 810' figure is to the underside of the slab of the most habitable floor. As you can see from the images, there's a bit more structure above 810'. In the 3rd image down, everything above the yellow is in addition to 810'.







__________________
titanic1

Last edited by BVictor1; Nov 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM.
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 5:25 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
810' figure is to the underside of the slab of the most habitable floor. As you can see from the images, there's a bit more structure above 810'. In the 3rd image down, everything above the yellow is in addition to 810'
If that is indeed the case, we could be looking at a height closer to 885' to the top of the... um... er, "chuppah?"
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 5:31 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 26,464
^ yes, i just carefully scaled the image and got an additional 75' above the yellow, for a total of 885'.
__________________
"every time a strip mall dies, an angel gets its wings"
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 5:42 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,971
^The diagrams I posted also show 78 floors.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 5:52 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 1,715
If it is 885 feet, and it's twin is at least 100 feet taller, then it's twin would be at least 985 feet tall! (Hurray for math!)
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 5:55 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,971
887' 2"
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 6:46 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
^ yes, i just carefully scaled the image and got an additional 75' above the yellow, for a total of 885'.
Carefully scaled? Haha I just eyeballed it
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
887' 2"
Boom.
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 6:52 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 26,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Carefully scaled? Haha I just eyeballed it
your eyeballs are very good.

but yeah, i scaled up the image in cad to get the grade line and the top of the yellow to be 810', then measured what was left.

bvic, thanks for getting the actual figure and floor count!
__________________
"every time a strip mall dies, an angel gets its wings"
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2015, 5:31 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,797
Working name for the project is Grant Park Tower. Also, it was mentioned at plan commission that financing is in place to start early next year. The contractor is McHugh, who is working to provide subcontract jobs to local minority owned firms.
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2015, 4:23 AM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
Working name for the project is Grant Park Tower.
They will probably settle on a more pretentious/trendy name.
My money is on "The Grant."
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:42 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.