HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #281  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2018, 8:16 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
^ In that case, I wonder if they would consider making the rest of the parking lot into a park or public space.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
     
     
  #282  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2018, 9:13 PM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
I would imagine the rest of that area will still be a part of the base of the tower and be filled with amenities+parking. They can still build something there, it just can't obstruct the views that the tower has of the Ogden slip and vice versa(last time I checked that was the rule)
__________________
For you - Bane
     
     
  #283  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2018, 9:20 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
2 yrs ago

__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #284  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 3:09 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
The sign should be covered by the landmarks designation, like the ones on the Marshall Field building.
The difference is that CHICAGO TRIBUNE, and the word mark represented in the sign, is an active trademark owned by someone other than the new owner of the building.
     
     
  #285  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 10:04 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
The difference is that CHICAGO TRIBUNE, and the word mark represented in the sign, is an active trademark owned by someone other than the new owner of the building.
I assure you that Macy’s owns the “Marshall Field & Co.” mark. It would have been acquired along with all of the other assets of the company; it doesn’t go away because they’re no longer trading as Marshall Field’s.
__________________
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." - Isaac Asimov
     
     
  #286  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 2:28 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
the sign was added relatively recently, replacing an older version
     
     
  #287  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 2:36 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
I assure you that Macy’s owns the “Marshall Field & Co.” mark. It would have been acquired along with all of the other assets of the company; it doesn’t go away because they’re no longer trading as Marshall Field’s.
But Macy bought out the Marshall Fields company, hence their name and branding.

The new developers of the Tribune property do not own the Chicago Tribune, it is a different entity, correct?
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
     
     
  #288  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 4:08 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
But Macy bought out the Marshall Fields company, hence their name and branding.

The new developers of the Tribune property do not own the Chicago Tribune, it is a different entity, correct?
You are correct. But what i believe 10023 was trying to imply was that even though Macy's owned the trademark to Marshall Field's, they were unable to remove the Marshall Field's name and plaques off the State Street store since it was landmarked as such.

The question here is since the Tribune Tower is landmarked, does that designation include the lettering on the building (as it did for Field's) or not? If so, then the Tribune has a much weaker (if not impossible) case about having that signage be removed.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
     
     
  #289  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 12:05 AM
Chris Stritzel's Avatar
Chris Stritzel Chris Stritzel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 296
Only 6 more days left till this is unveiled (hopefully). Chicago deserves something like this
     
     
  #290  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 1:58 AM
AlpacaObsessor AlpacaObsessor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Lincoln Park, Chicago
Posts: 120
You don't actually have to be a neighborhood resident to show up, right? I'm thinking about heading to the presentation just out of curiosity.
     
     
  #291  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 2:29 AM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlpacaObsessor View Post
You don't actually have to be a neighborhood resident to show up, right? I'm thinking about heading to the presentation just out of curiosity.
Definitely not, and it's not like they can prove whether or not you aren't a resident of the area anyway. They aren't making people bring a piece of mail with them haha

Go there and shout your support!
__________________
For you - Bane
     
     
  #292  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 4:32 PM
710cl 710cl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 25
I want to go to the thing Monday night and make a night out of it and take my gf to dinner nearby afterwards. I should get plenty of info and a look at renderings if I leave before 8 right? I've never been to one of these before.
     
     
  #293  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 4:36 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Will this tower be subject to presale requirements? If so, is it likely to rise?
     
     
  #294  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 4:56 PM
AlpacaObsessor AlpacaObsessor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Lincoln Park, Chicago
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
Will this tower be subject to presale requirements? If so, is it likely to rise?
I'm interested as well. It looks like One Chicago Square can, because it's only about 10% condos, but the Chicago Tribune Tower addition looks like it's more around 40% condos and 60% hotel rooms.
     
     
  #295  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 5:27 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlpacaObsessor View Post
I'm interested as well. It looks like One Chicago Square can, because it's only about 10% condos, but the Chicago Tribune Tower addition looks like it's more around 40% condos and 60% hotel rooms.
Thanks. That 60/40 number is promising.
     
     
  #296  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 5:28 PM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlpacaObsessor View Post
I'm interested as well. It looks like One Chicago Square can, because it's only about 10% condos, but the Chicago Tribune Tower addition looks like it's more around 40% condos and 60% hotel rooms.
I'd expect 33% sales before they break ground, if that. I wouldn't be too concerned about this one
__________________
For you - Bane
     
     
  #297  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 5:50 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire View Post
I'd expect 33% sales before they break ground, if that. I wouldn't be too concerned about this one
That’s very attainable.
     
     
  #298  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 6:40 PM
The Best Forumer's Avatar
The Best Forumer The Best Forumer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fvn View Post
I don't think so... they would be all over this thread if they were
Well... I have my fingers crossed...
__________________
The suburbs are second-rate. Cookie-cutter houses, treeless yards, mediocre schools, and more crime than you think. Do your family a favor and move closer to the city.
     
     
  #299  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 7:02 PM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
That’s very attainable.
What's more, it's in a highly desirable location. Steps from North Michigan Ave without being directly on it. We'll have to wait on details, but you pretty much can't get a better location.
     
     
  #300  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 9:10 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,180
Sorry if I missed this discussion, but where did the 1,388' height come from? Is it PD/zoning driven?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.