HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which Chicago casino proposal is your favorite?
Ballys at Tribune 24 18.05%
Ballys at McCormick 7 5.26%
Hard Rock at One Central 7 5.26%
Rivers at The 78 75 56.39%
Rivers at McCormick 20 15.04%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2020, 8:09 AM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedCorsair87 View Post
If we are wish-listing, I vote for a 1600ft tower, but it needs to be in the heart of the Loop. Anything taller than Sears is going to look ridiculous that far south (McCormick). Thompson is the perfect spot for one aesthetically and for a casino.

My $.02
Sears looked ridiculous where it is when it was built. As long as zoning could accommodate other large towers nearby eventually, it could grow into it like the areas around Sears basically did.
__________________
I like travel and photography - check out my Flickr page.
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2020, 2:27 PM
TR Devlin TR Devlin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 72
How big would a Chicago casino be?

The legislation enacted just over a year ago approved a Chicago casino with up to 4,000 gambling positions (slots or table seats). By comparison, Rivers in Rosemont, which I believe is currently the largest in Illinois, has 1,200 gambling positions. So the Chicago casino would be more than three times the size of Rivers.

Who would be the targeted customers?

Out-of-town people visiting Chicago; tourists, people here on business or for a convention, suburbanites spending a weekend in the city, etc. Most of these people are staying in downtown hotels and are not interested in going to Rivers in Rosemont or the Horseshoe in Whiting.

What’s the best location?

If you want to appeal to out-of-towners staying in a downtown hotel, the most important factors in deciding where to put a casino are

1. number of hotel rooms within a quarter mile, and
2. number of hotel rooms within a half mile.

And for a casino three times the size of Rivers, you probably need a full city block. Based on eyeballing Google maps, I’d say five floors of a full block in River North or eight floors in the Thompson Center would be about right for the gaming floors.

Problem with a very large casino near McCormick Place

Lots of people have said the casino should be near McCormick Place or even south of the Stevenson. It seems to me this creates a feast or famine situation. The casino does well when a large convention is in town but struggles in the rest (i.e., majority) of the year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2020, 2:36 PM
TR Devlin TR Devlin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Medinah Temple needs a new use . . .
The Medinah Temple is a wonderful old building in a terrific location. Unfortunately, it's way too small to be used as the 4,000 position casino that Chicago's planning.

IMO, the best use would be to restore this as a theater.

Last edited by TR Devlin; Sep 2, 2020 at 9:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 1:21 AM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 324
Downtown is where the action should be, casino developers tell Lightfoot

Four of the 11 responses received by the city came from major casino developers: Hard Rock, MGM Resorts, Wynn Resorts, and Related Midwest in partnership with Rush Street Gaming, the company chaired by Chicago billionaire and Rivers Casino Des Plaines magnate Neil Bluhm.

Four responses came from real estate developers D3 Realty, Development Management Associates, JDL, and R2 Companies.

Link: https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/12...hard-rock-wynn
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 1:30 AM
ORD2010 ORD2010 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 34
Honestly if we can get a tall building with some interesting unique architecture I would be very pro of a downtown casino, perhaps in the south loop to give the area a height/density boost and attract more hotels and commerce (motor row?). I like the potential of MGM, City Center and their Macau properties are all quite nice in design and execution. Wynn I'm afraid will give me their standard red tinted glass curved high rise like Vegas and Macau. The team with the Rivers owner I feel like we'd get a very generic build. I could be very wrong of course.

I don't know much about casino ops, but say a developer gets it, would they build it out and then lease it to probably one of the operators listed above? or would the developer try to run their own casino? in this case would an established major brand be the best bet for a properly run facility?

The only other downtown casino I've personally seen is the Jack in Cleveland and it wasn't the best.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 4:18 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,792
I've said this before, but the only location that makes any sense to me is the McCormick Place Lakeside facility. . . it has built in parking, access to rail and bus, close to Chinatown, nearby hotels, the Arie Crown Theater and is woefully underused. . .

You could use the momentum to get rid of that contentious FotParking lot to the north by grassing over and planting a 2,000' observation tower there. . . I know it's a long shot, but I'm just putting it out there to keep the (pipe)dream alive. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:02 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,339
I think McCormick is too remote from the Mag Mile to attract the casual tourist.

Were it up to me, I'd open temporarily in the Medinah Temple building and over the next five years convert the Thompson Center to casino and hotel. Both are well-positioned and need new uses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:05 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
I've said this before, but the only location that makes any sense to me is the McCormick Place Lakeside facility. . . it has built in parking, access to rail and bus, close to Chinatown, nearby hotels, the Arie Crown Theater and is woefully underused. . .

You could use the momentum to get rid of that contentious FotParking lot to the north by grassing over and planting a 2,000' observation tower there. . . I know it's a long shot, but I'm just putting it out there to keep the (pipe)dream alive. . .

. . .
That would be perfect actually.

Considering the design of literally every modern casino built in the US I would prefer no casino anywhere downtown unless it's reusing something.

Last edited by rlw777; Dec 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:16 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
I think McCormick is too remote from the Mag Mile to attract the casual tourist.

Were it up to me, I'd open temporarily in the Medinah Temple building and over the next five years convert the Thompson Center to casino and hotel. Both are well-positioned and need new uses.
I've been to a casino once (Horseshoe in Indiana just over the border), I can tell you pretty confidently that casino-goers are primarily not casual tourists. I firmly believe the vast majority would be high-money gamblers who can afford to lose a lot of money in one sitting, or gambling addicts who don't mind sitting for 6 hours straight in a windowless room - the Venn diagram between those two groups (gamblers and casual tourists) would show almost no intersection.
I think McCormick is more ideal because of what Tom said, plus the number of large hotels currently there (and any more in the immediate vicinity that may be planned for the future) would be better positioned to incentivize nearby gamblers, if any deal could be reached between McPier and those hotels. Far different crowds than people who would be staying at the Langham, St. Regis, or hell, even the Hilton Garden Inn downtown.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:16 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 774
I think the corporate/convention traveler is the true audience here. Really just convention traveler. Las Vegas is the biggest convention destination in the US.

Put the building wherever you can drain the pockets of the above as easily and as much as possible.

the 78, the lakefront McCormick place, or motor row area in the south loop.

anyone else that wants to gamble will seek it out, regardless of location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:18 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
I think McCormick is too remote from the Mag Mile to attract the casual tourist.

Were it up to me, I'd open temporarily in the Medinah Temple building and over the next five years convert the Thompson Center to casino and hotel. Both are well-positioned and need new uses.
Casino goers aren't "casual tourists", they're "destination tourists". . . and, incidentally, a desperate bunch that leave lots of sadness and cigarette butts in their wake. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:24 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
Casino goers aren't "casual tourists", they're "destination tourists". . . and, incidentally, a desperate bunch that leave lots of sadness and cigarette butts in their wake. . .

. . .
Also Casinos pretty much always run shuttle services so the mag mile tourists will have no problem getting there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:28 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlw777 View Post
Also Casinos pretty much always run shuttle services so the mag mile tourists will have no problem getting there.
Right. . . there's a grade seperated bus-way between Millennium Park and McCormick Place today that they can use like they do for Bears games. . . and you could simply run shuttles every ten minutes to Chinatown, twenty four hours a day, every day of the year. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:46 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
I've been to a casino once (Horseshoe in Indiana just over the border), I can tell you pretty confidently that casino-goers are primarily not casual tourists.
Chicago and Elizabeth, IN are two wholly different places in regards to tourism. Most definitely a Chicago casino would be likely half filled with tourists (specially those that like to casually gamble). Chicago is #5 top city in the US for tourism. I would be pretty sure that's why the respondents said the location should be downtown (or near downtown).

Wiki: As of 2018, New York City is the most visited destination in the United States, followed by Los Angeles, Orlando, Las Vegas, and Chicago. Tourists spend more money in the United States than any other country, while attracting the third-highest number of tourists after France and Spain.

The lakefront was another noticeable recommendation, which I can understand, but would seem to be a "pretty please" request.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:52 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 1,756
Don't forget that the size preference mentioned for a casino site was 10-25 acres. For areas around downtown, the new megadevelopments seem primed to host it. I recall last year the Tribune River District site was interested in hosting the casino: https://chicago.curbed.com/2019/8/8/...strict-tribune
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 6:09 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Don't forget that the size preference mentioned for a casino site was 10-25 acres. For areas around downtown, the new megadevelopments seem primed to host it. I recall last year the Tribune River District site was interested in hosting the casino: https://chicago.curbed.com/2019/8/8/...strict-tribune
For context 10 acres is about the size of the USPS building south of the old main post office.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 6:12 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhawk66 View Post
Chicago and Elizabeth, IN are two wholly different places in regards to tourism. Most definitely a Chicago casino would be likely half filled with tourists (specially those that like to casually gamble). Chicago is #5 top city in the US for tourism. I would be pretty sure that's why the respondents said the location should be downtown (or near downtown).


Precisely this. Obviously a certain segment of the customer base for a downtown casino will overlap with your Indiana/suburban/out-in-the-boonies casinos. However, on the whole, it will be a quite different market (not the destination/day-tripping/chain-smoking caricature) etc
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 6:33 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,224
River north would seem like a good spot for casino as well...its close enough to core downtown and mag mile and still in a touristy feel area... only issue is finding a large enough cohesive plot for something substantial... I like the Thompson center site as well... I feel like they can incorporate some type of theatre/live venue element to this casino to add to the Chicago theatre district theme... Either way this development needs to be large and architecturally significant which gives me hesitation because when Chicago is given a blank slate to do something special and large it tends to under perform time and time again unfortunately.. ala block 37, wolf point, spire site .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 6:35 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Precisely this. Obviously a certain segment of the customer base for a downtown casino will overlap with your Indiana/suburban/out-in-the-boonies casinos. However, on the whole, it will be a quite different market (not the destination/day-tripping/chain-smoking caricature) etc
I've never been to a city that had a downtown casino and thought, "Oh let's pop in here for a bit!" To me any city that has a casino - flashy or otherwise - in or very near to the CBD has an air of desperation around it. . . like, oh boy, this used to be a place once!

A downtown casino in Chicago is best left to where the convention traffic is greatest as well as close proximity to Chinatown - where the bulk of local casino traffic will come from anyways. . . the logical choice is the McCormick Place Lakeside facility. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 6:46 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicubs111 View Post
River north would seem like a good spot for casino as well...its close enough to core downtown and mag mile and still in a touristy feel area... only issue is finding a large enough cohesive plot for something substantial... I like the Thompson center site as well... I feel like they can incorporate some type of theatre/live venue element to this casino to add to the Chicago theatre district theme... Either way this development needs to be large and architecturally significant which gives me hesitation because when Chicago is given a blank slate to do something special and large it tends to under perform time and time again unfortunately.. ala block 37, wolf point, spire site .
I wouldn't be opposed to a casino in River North /or/ the Thompson Center if it could be incorporated into a larger entertainment complex which had wholly thought out programming where the casino can function as part of a greater whole. . . the only problem with both of those locations is by adding just a massive casino, you're creating a civic space that is not cohesive to the rest of the "neighborhood" and doesn't necessarily play nice with the surrounding businesses. . . unfortunately it appears as though they're looking for a place to plop down a massive casino-as-money-making-machine rather than what I would have in mind. . .

Therefore. . . McCormick Place Lakeside it is. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.