HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 2:23 PM
rbt rbt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maldive View Post

[B]Move over Mississauga… Markham in the house showing how she can build crazy stuff in fields too ;-).
It's an excellent place for that type of density though. There's a new York University campus under construction across the street and a GO station 50m away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 2:24 PM
rbt rbt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,372
.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 3:05 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,603
Markham hasn't seen a lot of high-rise development for the last decade because they had insanely high parkland dedication fees (something like $50-60,000 a unit) on apartments that broke the pro-forma in the City for apartments, and relatively few units got built.

The province forced them to change it a year or two ago so now apartment proposals are popping up everywhere.

They also had a height limit from Buttonville Airport, which like Downsview, has recently closed.. so that's gone now too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 6:37 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,034
Excellent is a stretch. GO rail is not even local transit. It's regional transit limited to a downtown specific corridor. The first phase sold well because of the York University campus. Can the campus attract more investors for the second, larger phase is the question in a worsening market.

It is close to Remington city centre development and provides airspace between the very tall towers. There are some good things to say about Remington's Gallery blocks. Ultimately, the ridiculous stacked densities at medium rise/ podium level will eventually be its undoing. It's Downtown Entertainment District density in a master planned community in overpriced Unionville.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 6:44 PM
theman23's Avatar
theman23 theman23 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ville de Québec
Posts: 5,222
Why didn't they build Union City south first? There's going to be a huge deadzone between the current development and the bus loop/GO platform.
__________________
For entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 6:46 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,034
Save the best for last
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 7:24 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,251
Holy sh*t Batman... this is nuts! I'd be happy with one lol.


110 Eglinton East | 236.55m | 58s | Madison Group | Rafael Viñoly l pre-construction

and

150 Eglinton East | 236.75m | 61s | Madison Group | Rafael Viñoly l pre-construction

61 storeys x 2 and 58 storeys x 2 with about 2400 residential units, retail and pretty amazing POPs.


UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

^^ NOTE: no baby grand piano for this proposal ... the big Bosendorfer for a big development
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 8:07 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,034
Piano render person lives!

Badly needed mid block connector that is almost aligned with the mid block walkway between Roehampton and Broadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 8:54 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,984
Those renderings look awesome.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 10:20 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is online now
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 7,316
110 and 150 Eglinton E:

Video Link


[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 2:26 AM
GeneralLeeTPHLS's Avatar
GeneralLeeTPHLS GeneralLeeTPHLS is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,418
My first, immediate reaction to this proposal was anger, and partly because the design reads as rather generic and monotomous with the repeated motifs over two sites. While I'm sure this would be a great landscaping/urban design plan on street level, but I'm conflicted on whether this would be an inviting/engaging space if executed with care.
Although I understand the commercial market is in a bad place now, I still wish to see the full office space replacement made here, as this project involves the demolition of two substantial buildings, which I'm torn on seeing demolished for this project, even despite their flaws.

I'm also curious how they'd pull off a mid-block connection here, although I can see the eastern site working with the planned redevelopment of the smaller brick condo tower by Redpath and Roehampton.
I'm fine with the height here, though I have a feeling this will see a reduction of height, especially to the eastern towers.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 2:39 AM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,251
One more:

110 Eglinton East | 236.55m | 58s | Madison Group | Rafael Viñoly l pre-construction

A great aerial of 110 Eglinton.


abovegrade

If and when this is built, and if and when (lol) the 2180 Yonge development is built, along with 7 or 8 other talls in the pipeline (up to 212 metres)…. one might argue that Yonge and Eglinton nabe on its own…
will have a more impressive skyline than many North American cities.



2180 Yonge @ 65, 65, 60, 55 and 45 storeys.


UT
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 2:53 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,034
110 Eglinton has 300,000 square feet of proposed office space. I don't like that there are 4 identical tower but, I can't be bothered to get any deeper. The specs are all unique for Toronto especially the free for all overdevelopment at Yonge & Eglinton. There's density left on the table. Two elevator cores per tower lowering the maximum efficiency of the floor plate. The ceiling heights are 2 feet higher than the norm. Etc.


I feel these were unbuilt visions for another city which the estate sold to Madison and TFAI hastily modified.

Sucks about the mid block connector being artistic impression
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 2:55 AM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,934
One of these towers would be great. Even a pair is fine. But 4 nearly-identical towers in an almost-row is just excessive.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 3:16 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,094
Yeah quadruplets is definitely pushing things a bit since I don't usually even like twins. Although I have a lot more patience for it in a somewhat "out of sight" area compared to if it was right downtown. And the style is kind of unique in their warm colour and lack of protruding balconies. These buildings may be repeats of each other, but at least they're quite unique compared to the prevailing highrise trends. I'd say I'm more for it than against it.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 3:32 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,759
Great looking towers, not so great looking street level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2024, 2:45 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,251
110 Eglinton East | 236.55m | 58s | Madison Group | Rafael Viñoly l pre-construction

One last angle on the proposal.


UT
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2024, 2:55 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,034
needs a signature supertall between these towers. Blue glass. That's what's missing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2024, 3:48 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
needs a signature supertall between these towers. Blue glass. That's what's missing.
^ The world must have tilted on its axis... because I agree with you .

Was just thinking a minute before I read your comment that a super-tall would be perfect for the Yonge and Egg skyline, especially if these are built.


1910 Yonge | 177.49m | 53s | Davpart | Graziani + Corazza l recommended for Approval

I doubt the Davisville community will be thrilled with this (does have rentals in the mix): now recommended for Approval. 53 and 48 storeys with a 1041 units in a rental/condo mix.


UT

UT

These monoliths below are proposed just up the street in the Davisville nabe (for heaven’s sake use some bloody orange or red brick and warm things up):


The Millwood | 157.6m | 45s | Times Group | Core Architects pre-construction


UT

UT
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2024, 5:44 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,795
1910 Yonge looks like crap. A regurgitated dates design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.