HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2021  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 5:52 PM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 177
Please God and bless us with a 1,000 footer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2022  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 7:43 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Pending permits are in place, this is not a drill!


462 E NORTH WATER ST
Holy shit! Talk about coming back from the dead!
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2023  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 7:44 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,852
WOW!!!

This is potentially the most exciting Chicago skyscraper news since 1000M re-broke ground back in December of '21.

At 875' this would be the 11th tallest tower in the city.

And I've always LOVED this design.


Here's to hoping!
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2024  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 8:15 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorganChi View Post
Please God and bless us with a 1,000 footer
Probably not, but 875' is decent. Parcel I, Tribune and NEMA II have supertall potentials though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2025  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 8:30 PM
UrbanDweller98 UrbanDweller98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 58
Hopefully after construction costs go down in a few years the south tower will get a height bump. Sucks that this isn’t the Spire, but it definitely beats a giant hole in the ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2026  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 8:37 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,040
Hope is hard to hang onto for this project. Currently glass half full. That the intention to build is now established via permits is great, but they'll need a substantial construction loan to begin.
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2027  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 8:58 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,379
^ ChiPlanner pointed out Related Midwest secured a loan from IDHA. It looks like it's for....$510 million!

https://www.ihda.org/wp-content/uplo...-Notice_v2.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2028  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 9:06 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
^ ChiPlanner pointed out Related Midwest secured a loan from IDHA. It looks like it's for....$510 million!

https://www.ihda.org/wp-content/uplo...-Notice_v2.pdf
Wow. So, in theory..... We should see an actual ground breaking soon?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2029  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2023, 10:46 PM
CaptainJilliams CaptainJilliams is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 138
This is great news, fingers crossed this one finally gets built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2030  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 12:13 AM
donnie's Avatar
donnie donnie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 596
This is the project I have been waiting for since the beginning of the boom!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2031  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 3:48 AM
pip's Avatar
pip pip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,246
What!?!

Out of nowhere. Great news!

Does anyone have the latest image for the design of these buildings?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2032  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 3:59 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,852
This is the most recent publicly released design, AFAIK.

__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2033  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 4:16 AM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 203
Just trying to understand this process. That meeting was for public notice and comment correct? That seems to be a step in the process but there are more steps if they are under the following 'Program Bond' process that I dug up on the ISDA website:

https://www.ihda.org/developers/mult...2/#toggle-id-2

Program bonds have a 'Public Comment Period' and the Conduit Bond Program does not, so I assume that is the program they are under. It also mentions the TEFRA Hearing that was alluded to in the memo Randomguy posted (https://www.ihda.org/wp-content/uplo...-Notice_v2.pdf) so they're at least not at that point yet.

Which according to the timeline doc means they just finished weeks 16-17 of a 28-29 week period when the 'initial closing' will commence. See full timeline here (and reproduced at bottom)

https://www.ihda.org/wp-content/uplo...ne-Website.pdf

Also this is just for the issuance for the bonds correct? It isn't a direct loan. They still have to find people to buy the bonds? From the first link:

Quote:
IHDA can act as bond issuer and lender and provide credit enhancement through its HUD Risk Share Program. IHDA will underwrite the loan to the Risk Share standards and obtain an FHA-insured loan. The developer is able to work with IHDA directly for the bond issuance, bond loan and automatic 4% LIHTC award. IHDA will also sell the bonds in the marketplace to obtain the bond rate.
Of course having the bonds FHA insured and tax exempt makes them much more attractive. I don't entirely understand what the above quote means in terms of a direct loan. Does it mean they also automatically buy 4%?

PS: It would be great if any of the other documents like the PPA they would have had to submit are publicly available. Maybe someone can contact the ISDA...



Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiPlanner View Post
This was approved at the Illinois Housing Development Authority’s Board meeting yesterday for financing of the north tower. 80/20 marker/affordable unit split. It’s happening!

Last edited by BrickellBased; Jul 23, 2023 at 4:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2034  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 11:46 AM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchymunch View Post
800ft+ towers continue in Chicago.
Indeed, this is the main reason for me to get excited about this project.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerbogerz View Post
this is gonna be the first skyline changing tower since st regis.
I am afraid not, since it's not much taller than its neighbors especially the 837 foot One Bennett Park, and its taper reduces the impact. Take a look at rgarri4's model (disregard Parcel I):

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgarri4 View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2035  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 2:30 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickellBased View Post

Also this is just for the issuance for the bonds correct? It isn't a direct loan. They still have to find people to buy the bonds?
Here’s a description I found on IHDA’s website:
Quote:
IHDA can act as bond issuer and lender and provide credit enhancement through its HUD Risk Share Program. IHDA will underwrite the loan to the Risk Share standards and obtain an FHA-insured loan. The developer is able to work with IHDA directly for the bond issuance, bond loan and automatic 4% LIHTC award. IHDA will also sell the bonds in the marketplace to obtain the bond rate.
I suppose my questions would be:
Do they have investors already lined up?
How many bonds would they need to sell before breaking ground?
If they weren’t somewhat confident in their ability to sell the necessary bonds to start construction would they be filing construction permits?

To me, all signs point to a good probability that this project will start soon though possibly delayed. My guess is that we see major work commence in early 2024.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2036  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 2:43 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 203
Yeah - obviously some things are in motion so it's great news.

Getting permits approved as early as possible and making it look like everything's going smoothly will also help convince investors to buy the bonds.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Klippenstein View Post
Here’s a description I found on IHDA’s website:


I suppose my questions would be:
Do they have investors already lined up?
How many bonds would they need to sell before breaking ground?
If they weren’t somewhat confident in their ability to sell the necessary bonds to start construction would they be filing construction permits?

To me, all signs point to a good probability that this project will start soon though possibly delayed. My guess is that we see major work commence in early 2024.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2037  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 2:45 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
They also had soil testing done on the site in June for Thorium which passed. Related is a massive corporation if they’re going through all the trouble plus these IHDA bonds then I’d be pretty confident we see some movement soon.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2038  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 2:58 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 203
Also now we can start fantasizing about either Tribune East or Site I (or all 3!) also coming back from the dead and going up at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2039  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 3:37 PM
UrbanDweller98 UrbanDweller98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post

I am afraid not, since it's not much taller than its neighbors especially the 837 foot One Bennett Park, and its taper reduces the impact. Take a look at rgarri4's model (disregard Parcel I):
Yeah, 1000M is far more impactful on the skyline given it’s prominence.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2040  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2023, 8:05 PM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 177



Time for an update I suppose , or keep our hopes out if they want to combine the both towers

Last edited by MorganChi; Jul 24, 2023 at 3:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.