Quote:
Originally Posted by kool maudit
Conservatism is not really an ideology of its own, but more of a temperament within small-l liberalism."The Right" (read: the King) is wholly to the right of contemporary market liberalism, and "The Left" (read: the Party) is wholly to its left. What we speak of as the right and the left within market liberalism are either tendencies that try to borrow from these external forms, or tendencies that merely flatter them. They do not have consistent meanings.
|
Interesting take (as always).
The way I like to categorize it, speaking very broadly, is that there have always been three main sorts of general ideological "personalities": Liberals, Conservatives, and Disruptors.
The Liberals and Conservatives largely adhere to some variant of the status quo, either more progressive or more traditional; more collectivist or more individualistic; whatever the case may be. In the current Western context this basically means falling somewhere on the spectrum between social democrat-leaning market liberalism and libertarian-leaning market liberalism. In other societies and other eras they'll have different markers, but the personalities that adhere to one or the other are largely the same.
But then there are the Disruptors: they can be communists, they can be fascists, religious zealots, or something slightly less extreme - either way, they're angry, youthful, prone to violence, and generally evocative of the zeitgeists of the moment. They seek radical change and a "reset" of existing social & economic systems.
Right now, the latter group (of multiple, often opposing ideological variants) is clearly in ascent, and probably more visible in the politics of Western democracies than it has been at any point in the past half century