HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2009, 10:16 PM
Rathgrith's Avatar
Rathgrith Rathgrith is offline
I'm just joking.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
Are you kidding? I find that hard to believe. Where are you talking about?
Pretty much anywhere after Arnpiror to Renfrew and all the way to Petawawa at least. Its even funner with 20 cars following behind a transport trunk at dusk with little passing space to provide safe passing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2009, 11:28 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Back to the broader topic, another reason Ottawa area has not received as much money for highway improvements - there aren't a whole lot of big things necessary right now under provincial jurisdiction.

Highway 7:
-Once the section to Carleton Place is completed, no additional short-term work is necessary.
-Additional widening to 4 lanes from Carleton Place to Perth may be needed in the middle term.
-On the western side, the section east of Peterborough to Havelock should also be widened to 4 lanes.

Highway 17:
-Biggest project in Eastern Ontario, as mentioned in previous posts - replace with new 4-lane 417 extension at least to Petawawa and eventually North Bay (joining up with Northern Ontario projects).

Highway 401:
-Should be widened to 6 lanes now from Cobourg to Kingston, beginning in Belleville and at the endpoints.
-Will need to be widened to 6 lanes from Kingston to Highway 416 in the middle term (by about 2020-2025).

Highway 417:
-Should be widened to 6 lanes as far as Anderson Road, and eventually Boundary Road.
-Biggest expense on the existing highway will be rebuilding the 417/174 split, but that could be a federal project as it involves the Kettle Island bridge.
-No major widening needed (or possible) in the urban area.
-Further widening needed in the west end - 6 lanes to Highway 7, maybe with 2 extra HOV lanes as far as Palladium Drive.

On other provincial highways, including 416, nothing really is needed in the foreseeable future.

That's not to say there are other needs, but they fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government (i.e. Kettle Island) or the City of Ottawa (i.e. CR 174).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2009, 2:03 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
I guess the main reason would be Petawawa, a major Forces base. In the US, the Americans would almost think it inconceivable that a military base would not be accessible by wide roads on which to transport tanks and large equipment. The Interstate system was initially designed with defense in mind after World War II, to be able to quickly move troops and weapons across the US.

I often wonder how they transport explosives and arms into the base, and whether some of this stuff actually comes down the Queensway.
There's always rail:
Video Link


Granted, that's an equipment train but explosives and arms can be transported that way and it's good reason to keep the Beachburg Subdivision in place would be to maintain military transport options to points east.
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2009, 2:23 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Good grief... most of these are completely unnecessary and HSR should take priority before any more 6-laning goes on. With few exceptions, we've got all the freeways we'll need in a future of much higher energy costs.

We're living in the twilight years of low-cost energy. Enjoy it while it lasts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eternallyme View Post
Back to the broader topic, another reason Ottawa area has not received as much money for highway improvements - there aren't a whole lot of big things necessary right now under provincial jurisdiction.

Highway 7:
-Once the section to Carleton Place is completed, no additional short-term work is necessary.
-Additional widening to 4 lanes from Carleton Place to Perth may be needed in the middle term.
Even assuming that the energy status quo carries on indefinitely, this doesn't make too much sense. Going to Perth achieves what, exactly? Perth is a town of all of 6000 or so. You'd be better off twinning Hwy 15 to Smith's Falls. Indeed, Hwy 416 should never have been built at all - 'Hwy 415' should have been built instead following Hwy 7 & 15 (Hwy 15 used to go to Ottawa on a shared alignment with Hwy 7) and then Hwy 32 to the bridge at Gananoque (far more useful than the bridge at Prescott). Then some of the improvements to Hwy 401 that you list below would also not be needed.

It's already pretty close timewise between taking Hwy 416 and Hwy 401 to Kingston compared to Hwy 7 and Hwy 15. With Hwy 7 twinned to Carleton Place, the latter route will win so that makes the decision to build the 400-series connection to the 401 on the Hwy 16 corridor rather than the Hwy 7&15 corridor all the more short-sighted.

Quote:
-On the western side, the section east of Peterborough to Havelock should also be widened to 4 lanes.

Highway 17:
-Biggest project in Eastern Ontario, as mentioned in previous posts - replace with new 4-lane 417 extension at least to Petawawa and eventually North Bay (joining up with Northern Ontario projects).

Highway 401:
-Should be widened to 6 lanes now from Cobourg to Kingston, beginning in Belleville and at the endpoints.
-Will need to be widened to 6 lanes from Kingston to Highway 416 in the middle term (by about 2020-2025).

Highway 417:
-Should be widened to 6 lanes as far as Anderson Road, and eventually Boundary Road.
-Biggest expense on the existing highway will be rebuilding the 417/174 split, but that could be a federal project as it involves the Kettle Island bridge.
-No major widening needed (or possible) in the urban area.
-Further widening needed in the west end - 6 lanes to Highway 7, maybe with 2 extra HOV lanes as far as Palladium Drive.
I thought that (6 lanes to Hwy 7) was going to happen anyway.

Quote:
On other provincial highways, including 416, nothing really is needed in the foreseeable future.

That's not to say there are other needs, but they fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government (i.e. Kettle Island) or the City of Ottawa (i.e. CR 174).
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2009, 1:04 PM
Davis137's Avatar
Davis137 Davis137 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,290
Well, I think that any additions to the highway will be an improvement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 1:14 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 739
Bringing a post back from the dead...

Living in Riverside south for 6 years now, I can say a true 416-417 south corridor-connector is sorely needed. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Leitrim Road is a complete disaster. While the traffic this morning was punctuated by rain, I ended up on Ramsayville Road trying to get into work today because Lietrim was a wall of cars from the Airport to Hawthorne; Hawthorne was a wall from Louisseize northward and lord knows what was happening on Limebank, Bank and Albion themselves.

Its getting worse and worse and while I agree with the statement that "I chose to live there"; the city has a responsibility to build an infrastructure correlating with developments they approve. I'm all for intensification, I'm all for LRT, but stop approving so many developments in the south and not supporting it with appropriate road infrastructure.

Building a 4 lane road with traffic lights will only result in another Hunt Club Road-which is another south end disaster. This city needs a limited access east west road in the south end. The argument that it will encourage sprawl is mute because the sprawl is getting approved by council on a monthly basis.

And just imagine if the built a kettle island bridge and routed truck traffic onto this theoretical southern corridor. Heaven forbid we actually create a logical network of roads in this city.

End of Rant...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 1:45 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by daud View Post
Bringing a post back from the dead...

Living in Riverside south for 6 years now, I can say a true 416-417 south corridor-connector is sorely needed. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Leitrim Road is a complete disaster. While the traffic this morning was punctuated by rain, I ended up on Ramsayville Road trying to get into work today because Lietrim was a wall of cars from the Airport to Hawthorne; Hawthorne was a wall from Louisseize northward and lord knows what was happening on Limebank, Bank and Albion themselves.

Its getting worse and worse and while I agree with the statement that "I chose to live there"; the city has a responsibility to build an infrastructure correlating with developments they approve. I'm all for intensification, I'm all for LRT, but stop approving so many developments in the south and not supporting it with appropriate road infrastructure.

Building a 4 lane road with traffic lights will only result in another Hunt Club Road-which is another south end disaster. This city needs a limited access east west road in the south end. The argument that it will encourage sprawl is mute because the sprawl is getting approved by council on a monthly basis.

And just imagine if the built a kettle island bridge and routed truck traffic onto this theoretical southern corridor. Heaven forbid we actually create a logical network of roads in this city.

End of Rant...
I hate to say it but I don't think we should be incentivising suburban sprawl and the continued depopulation of the central areas of the city. Ottawa is already known as the city that fun forgot because nobody stays downtown after hours, everybody rushes out to the suburbs post haste.

It's been said before but it bears repeating: widening roads to cure traffic is a bit like loosening your belt to cure obesity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 1:53 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
I hate to say it but I don't think we should be incentivising suburban sprawl and the continued depopulation of the central areas of the city. Ottawa is already known as the city that fun forgot because nobody stays downtown after hours, everybody rushes out to the suburbs post haste.

It's been said before but it bears repeating: widening roads to cure traffic is a bit like loosening your belt to cure obesity.
I think that might be the thinking "du jour" but its a simple fact. You cannot build thousands of homes and not complement it with road infrastructure.

I don't totally disagree with what you are saying but I think its overstated. The city should not approve all these south end developments if it is not going to invest in its roads. Period. Findlay Creek has got over 1000 homes approved, Riverside south about the same, Barrhaven even more. Something has to give...

And you know, people are reading this and saying...just move. I get that. But, a proper city would have its transportation and its housing development plans in sync. And I think its perfectly debatable that our city does not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 1:57 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,510
Does the city even have a plan for an east/west bypass? All of the good routes are being filled up with upteen billion traffic lights and urban sprall is blocking off all of the corridors. If we wait much longer, the only option for a bypass will be the 401.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 2:12 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Does the city even have a plan for an east/west bypass? All of the good routes are being filled up with upteen billion traffic lights and urban sprall is blocking off all of the corridors. If we wait much longer, the only option for a bypass will be the 401.
It was on the provincial planning plate about 10-15 years ago but I believe you are right. The corridors are getting filled. Lietrim itself would have been a good choice as it could have provided limited access to the airport as well; however, the city has approved about 1000 homes I believe on Leitrim between Bank and Albion (Northward expansion of Findlay Creek)

And really, to complement what passwordisnt123 said, I'm ok with not building roads in the south-totally OK with it; but if you don't, for pete's sake, don't keep approving developments that will bring 10's of thousands of people. This is the disconnect that bothers me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 2:23 PM
Jeremy Coe, C.E.T. Jeremy Coe, C.E.T. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 9
Pre-Amalgamation, there was a ring road proposal being worked on. (I know because a friend of mine was working on it) and once amalgamation started, the whole thing got cancelled.

We will never have a ring road, or an East-West Corridor. It just won't happen. The closest thing we had was Hunt Club but that got bungled as well.

More importantly, we need more North South road infrastructure. Just imagine Merivale, Woodroffe and Greenbank roads in the next 10 years.

IMHO of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 2:27 PM
FFX-ME's Avatar
FFX-ME FFX-ME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,053
This is the only reference to such a project I found online. It likely won't happen.

http://www.obj.ca/Opinion/2015-09-10...tawa-traffic/1

Ottawa is in dire need of such a ring road as well as new bridges but the funds just aren't there. The city is putting all the eggs in the LRT basket.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 2:28 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by daud View Post
The city should not approve all these south end developments if it is not going to invest in its roads. Period. Findlay Creek has got over 1000 homes approved, Riverside south about the same, Barrhaven even more. Something has to give...
I agree, the city shouldn't be approving these sprawling developments. I was hopping that after amalgamation, the city would be able to have more control over the developers, as they can't threaten to move to another city/township as easily. In reality it hasn't worked out that way. I guess now there are fewer people to bribe sweet talk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 3:35 PM
ars ars is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 472
I really think some noise needs to be made about this. I would start with contacting the councillors, because at the rate that the southern part of the city is expanding, the current roads and infrastructure won't be able to support the influx of traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 3:50 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 68,143
One thing is certain is that there is a lot of east-west vehicle traffic that goes through central Ottawa on the 417 that doesn't have to go through there.
__________________
The Last Word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 4:24 PM
hwy418 hwy418 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy Coe, C.E.T. View Post
Pre-Amalgamation, there was a ring road proposal being worked on. (I know because a friend of mine was working on it) and once amalgamation started, the whole thing got cancelled.

We will never have a ring road, or an East-West Corridor. It just won't happen. The closest thing we had was Hunt Club but that got bungled as well.

More importantly, we need more North South road infrastructure. Just imagine Merivale, Woodroffe and Greenbank roads in the next 10 years.

IMHO of course.
That's right - it was MTO's Vars-to-Kars study (this was to be Highway 418 )

There's a lot of merit to build this as a toll route - about time we get our own version of the ETR. Sadly, without a major shift in governance (i.e. NCR district) this will likely never happen. The Provincial Legislature seems to think the world is flat and it ends at Belleville.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 4:43 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy418 View Post
That's right - it was MTO's Vars-to-Kars study (this was to be Highway 418 )

There's a lot of merit to build this as a toll route - about time we get our own version of the ETR. Sadly, without a major shift in governance (i.e. NCR district) this will likely never happen. The Provincial Legislature seems to think the world is flat and it ends at Belleville.
sadly even whitby-oshawa seem to have more road infrastructure. I found your Highway 418. and I know the 412 is already open.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 5:47 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by daud View Post
sadly even whitby-oshawa seem to have more road infrastructure. I found your Highway 418. and I know the 412 is already open.
Maybe someone got confused between Ottawa and Oshawa and decided to build the 418 to bypass Oshawa instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 6:03 PM
FFX-ME's Avatar
FFX-ME FFX-ME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,053
The former plan for the 400-series highways had it in. Can't find the current one though:



They should really extend the 417 to North bay, Sudbury and Sault Ste Marie too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2016, 6:16 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by ars View Post
I really think some noise needs to be made about this. I would start with contacting the councillors, because at the rate that the southern part of the city is expanding, the current roads and infrastructure won't be able to support the influx of traffic.
True. Make sure you to let your councillor know that you want urban sprawl to stop. The roads are fine the way they are as long as the city doesn't grow sideways uncontrollably.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.