HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2024, 6:07 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
I'm realizing now that maybe I don't understand the full extent of this deal.

So the City wanted:

- Two lane Transitway;
- Four vehicle lanes connecting to a future Hunt-Club/Walkley extension;
- An MUP.

What did the City get exactly?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 4:10 PM
Tesladom Tesladom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 467
2 Lanes, exactly the same capacity as current Renaud Road, just bypassing the residential area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 4:19 PM
Lakeofthewood Lakeofthewood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesladom View Post
2 Lanes, exactly the same capacity as current Renaud Road, just bypassing the residential area.
It seems like it includes some transit priority measures on Navan and HOV lanes on Innes too?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 4:29 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesladom View Post
2 Lanes, exactly the same capacity as current Renaud Road, just bypassing the residential area.
Thanks. That alone should be a huge improvement over the 90 degree turns and having to deal with the stop sign through that neighborhood, which really backs things up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 4:31 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakeofthewood View Post
It seems like it includes some transit priority measures on Navan and HOV lanes on Innes too?
That's part of the The Blackburn Hamlet Bypass / Innes Road Transit Priority Measures, which were split off into their own project, separate from the Brian Coburn Extension:
https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/publi...c-a7d076a65a56
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 4:46 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
That's part of the The Blackburn Hamlet Bypass / Innes Road Transit Priority Measures, which were split off into their own project, separate from the Brian Coburn Extension:
https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/publi...c-a7d076a65a56
Yes, but that was also part of the City/NCC deal.

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/city-...ation-east-end

Having a separate MUP along Innes between Blair and Blackburn Hamlet should be a significant cycling improvement. The current unprotected/floating bike lanes on a 80km/hr road are pretty scary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 5:13 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransitZilla View Post
Yes, but that was also part of the City/NCC deal.

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/city-...ation-east-end

Having a separate MUP along Innes between Blair and Blackburn Hamlet should be a significant cycling improvement. The current unprotected/floating bike lanes on a 80km/hr road are pretty scary.
I'm reading between the lines and envisioning that the deal may actually be something like this:

[2015]
Ottawa: We want your land to build a Transitway.
NCC: No.

[2020]
Ottawa: We need your land to build a Transitway.
NCC: No.

[2023]
Ottawa: Waaah! But we want to extend Brian Coburn Rd to bypass that dogleg on Renaud Rd!
NCC: Fine. We'll trade you the land you need to extend Brian Coburn Rd for the current Renaud Rd, and you pay to revert it to a natural state, as long as you agree that it will remain a 2-lane road.
Ottawa: But we also want to put Transit lanes on Brian Coburn.
NCC: Not gonna happen. Take this deal or stuff it.
Ottawa: But we need to make it seem like this is actually a benefit for Orleans residents!
NCC: OK, then we can write up a joint press release and mention your existing transit priority measures on Innes Rd and Navan Rd... you know, to make it seem like it was part of the plan all along.
Ottawa: Deal. Phew, thanks man. I owe you one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 6:18 PM
hwy418 hwy418 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransitZilla View Post
Having a separate MUP along Innes between Blair and Blackburn Hamlet should be a significant cycling improvement. The current unprotected/floating bike lanes on a 80km/hr road are pretty scary.
Agreed. Bikes should not be on 80 km/h (100 km/h design speed) urban roads - even if there are cycle tracks as they would be within the clear zone.

IMO, peds and bikes should be on MUPs no closer than 3m from the closest travel lane for all roads posted 70 km/h or above. This is supported in OTM Book 18.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 7:53 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy418 View Post
...a direct connection from Brian Coburn to Walkley via the hydro corridor almost makes too much sense! I work with the guy who was the City's project manager for that study and he said the NCC wouldn't allow it... sensitive grasses I guess! I'm in Chapel Hill and my old office was located off Hunt Club near Bank. There were many east-enders who commuted to the south end.
could not agree more. Its so obvious, just looking at a map and it distributes traffic coming from/to orleans along another corridor. Walkley is also not overly busy in the east end during peak periods.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 8:04 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,662
The worst part is that that it's inevitable it will connect to Walkley in 10+ years. The city is not going to stop growing. We could do it right now in today's dollars, or do a half measure today only to rip it up later and do the full measure in tomorrow's dollars. This is the Ottawa way. Four levels of government is crippling. The NCC strikes again!!!!
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2024, 1:09 PM
Tesladom Tesladom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy418 View Post
Agreed. Bikes should not be on 80 km/h (100 km/h design speed) urban roads - even if there are cycle tracks as they would be within the clear zone.
Actually, there is a sign that directs the bikes to take old Innes Road when approaching the bypass. Although the use bikes is not banned, the signage points them to use the road through Blackburn Hamlet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2024, 1:24 PM
Fading Isle Fading Isle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesladom View Post
Actually, there is a sign that directs the bikes to take old Innes Road when approaching the bypass. Although the use bikes is not banned, the signage points them to use the road through Blackburn Hamlet
Innes between Blair Road and Blackburn Hamlet is 80. There are painted bike lanes along that stretch, but it's a terrifying place to bike and gets very little use because of that. I frequently see people who are either on their phones, driving large trucks or who are just bad at driving, constantly veering into those bike lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.