HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2021, 11:39 PM
Manitopiaaa Manitopiaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alexandria, Royal Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
I went down to $10 billion. WOW@Boston

This is 547 companies btw

Boston-Worcester-Providence
$184.605 Thermo Fisher Scientific
$108.603 Raytheon
$99.708 American Tower
$94.606 General Electric
$89.398 CVS
$81.991 TJX Companies
$61.457 Vertex Pharmaceuticals
$54.584 Analog Devices
$50.913 Boston Scientific
$45.209 Roper Technologies

$41.339 Moderna
$37.679 Biogen
$34.172 Alexion Pharmaceuticals
$29.657 Eversource
$25.676 State Streeet Financial
$22.456 Wayfair Inc
$19.908 Teradyne
$18.718 Hologic
$18.238 DraftKings Inc
$18.191 HubSpot

$17.091 Akamai Technologies
$16.853 Insulet Corporation
$16.068 PerkinElmer
$15.351 Waters Corporation
$15.272 Citizens Financial
$15.100 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
$14.714 Boston Properties
$14.650 ABIOMED
$14.020 Cognex
$13.954 PTC Inc

$13.453 Sarepta Therapeutics
$12.972 Entegris
$12.817 Hasbro
$12.561 Nuance Communications
$12.428 Charles River Laboratories
$12.206 Dynatrace
$12.172 Boston Beer
$11.928 IBG Photonics
$11.061 Textron
$10.753 Pegasystems

$10.485 Repligen
$10.477 Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Boston is definitely an interesting case. If there's any megacap boom in the Northeast, it appears it'd have to be Boston.

Moderna, Biogen, Wayfair, DraftKings, Akamai all seem like "mega caps in the making" to me. Don't know much about the others, but they seem tech- and bio-tech centered, which also bodes well for mega cap growth. One of my best performing stocks this year was ARKG, an ETF focused on the "Genetic Revolution." Boston is very well positioned for that.

I'm seeing Roper is based in Sarasota though, so you might need to confirm that one.

Also, fun fact: The entire United Kingdom has 42 companies over $10 billion, France and Germany each have 51, Spain and Italy each have 17, and Canada has 49.

So our largest metros outcompete entire G-20 countries. Insane.

Last edited by Manitopiaaa; Jan 3, 2021 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2021, 12:06 AM
Manitopiaaa Manitopiaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alexandria, Royal Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 494
Using dimondparks' metro numbers, among entities with 10+ companies over $10b. My source has 582 American companies over $10 billion market cap though, not 547: https://companiesmarketcap.com/usa/l...et-cap/?page=6

Number of Publicly Traded Companies, Market Cap of $10B+
  • 582 -- USA --
  • 128 -- CHINA --
  • 119 -- JAPAN --
  • 90 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland
  • 83 New York-Newark
  • 51 -- FRANCE --
  • 51 -- GERMANY --
  • 49 -- CANADA --
  • 47 -- INDIA --
  • 42 -- UNITED KINGDOM --
  • 42 Boston-Worcester-Providence
  • 35 -- SWITZERLAND --
  • 34 Chicago-Naperville
  • 25 -- NETHERLANDS --
  • 25 -- SWEDEN --
  • 23 -- AUSTRALIA --
  • 22 -- SOUTH KOREA --
  • 20 -- BRAZIL --
  • 20 Dallas-Fort Worth
  • 18 Los Angeles-Long Beach
  • 18 Washington-Baltimore-Arlington
  • 19 -- TAIWAN --
  • 17 -- ITALY --
  • 17 -- SPAIN --
  • 15 Houston-The Woodlands
  • 15 Philadelphia-Reading-Camden
  • 14 Atlanta-Athens-Clarke County-Sandy Springs
  • 14 Minneapolis-St Paul
  • 13 Seattle-Tacoma
  • 10 Cleveland-Akron-Canton
  • 10 Denver-Aurora
  • 10 Phoenix-Mesa
  • 10 -- SAUDI ARABIA --

Might be missing a country or two here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2021, 12:34 AM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
Market cap is meaningless
Agreed, Tesla is proof of this. Market cap is a joke and tells you next to nothing about the economic activity the actual HQ gives the area it's based in.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2021, 4:37 AM
Shawn Shawn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 5,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One View Post
Agreed, Tesla is proof of this. Market cap is a joke and tells you next to nothing about the economic activity the actual HQ gives the area it's based in.
Depends on the vertical we're talking about. Clearly in Boston's case, all of the biotech, pharma, AI/robotics, and fin/adtech HQ'd in the region provide a massive amount of well-paying local R&D employment (along with all the ancillary industries which support this), in addition to all the head office functions. Cambridge alone has more lab space than a few American ~2 million metro area core cities have in total downtown Class A office space (approaching 26 million sq feet with another 3+ million in the pipeline).

I agree though that for some verticals, like energy/mining, consumer electronics/white goods, retail, and even finance (especially retail-focused), HQs don't impact the local economy proportionally to their market caps. Walmart is a great example of this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2021, 4:46 AM
Shawn Shawn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 5,935
What happens to the rankings when we include private companies with estimated values above $10 billion?

Forbes' America's Largest Private Companies

Eyeballing it, it looks like New York and DC/Baltimore gain the most, with Chicago, Boston, Philly, Detroit, "Wisconsin", and "Oklahoma" (Milwaukee and OK City?) picking up a few too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.