|
Posted Mar 12, 2008, 8:10 PM
|
|
Sarcstic Caper in Exile
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,112
|
|
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Cape Breton Post
Quote:
Northside Civic Centre could draw on new federal fund
Section: Front
By Erin Pottie, Cape Breton Post
During a meeting over the proposed Northside Civic Centre, officials revealed a funding option they believe could bring the $12-million project to life.
Cape Breton North MLA Cecil Clarke announced possible funding under the new federal Building Canada Fund, requiring the community to raise $1.5 million for the project.
Under the proposal, all three levels of government - provincial, federal and municipal - would contribute $4 million each in funding the centre.
In breaking down the costs, Cape Breton Regional Municipality Mayor John Morgan said the CBRM has $2.5 million in reserve for the project, leaving $1.5 million to be raised through fundraising efforts. Construction would then depend on federal and provincial approval, and require the municipality to make the civic centre its top priority for community infrastructure.
"If it takes two seasons to do it right, it's one window, one opportunity. It will take however long it takes to do it right this time, and I think that's what we need," Clarke told a large crowd gathered at the North Sydney fire hall, Tuesday.
Northside Civic Centre Society chair Leo Steele said their group already has $500,000 for the project.
"I can't wait till tomorrow morning to get started," Steele said of raising the final the $1 million.
Clarke said the society will not be able receive any money through Enterprise Cape Breton Corp., Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency or Nova Scotia Health, Promotion and Protection. He also said the civic centre will proceed as a $12-million project and can't be constructed in phases.
"Municipal government is going to be working with the society, using our staff to assemble the application to ensure everything the federal government and provincial government requires is in the application," said Morgan, who revealed the society will be applying to the new program in the next few weeks.
"Unfortunately, we have 20 other projects on the board," said District 16 Coun. Wes Stubbert. "Unfortunately we've been skating around, dancing around this rink project for about 10 years. I certainly know that the municipality will support their end of it. Hopefully we'll see a sod turning in the not-too-distant future."
The Building Canada Fund is part of a $33-billion federal fund, with $8.8 billion for projects that deliver economic, environmental and social benefits to all Canadians.
|
Quote:
Clean up, clean up, everybody clean up
Remediation work continues on former mine site
Section: Northside/Victoria
By Julie Collins,
Remediation work on 40 hectares of the former Princess mine site is in full swing.
The present contractor, RDL Construction of Sydney, is bringing the waste rock into a central pile, making it more efficient and less costly to cap. This will bring some of the land back into a more useful state.
As part of the process, the land is continually tested to determine the soil quality. The mine site, which has been divided into two sections - the washplant and waste rock area - is being remediated to light industrial and recreational.
"Once the waste rock work is complete, we'll focus on the design for a new cover or cap that will go on top of the waste rock pile," said Eric Parsons, project leader with Public Works and Government Services Canada for Devco's site closure program.
Parsons is hoping work will begin on the final cover sometime in the summer or by early fall.
"We plan to go back to the community with another open house in May to provide an update and let people know where we are heading with the final design."
The area of the site south of Ocean Street that was the washplant, is now a green area with an interpretative park, walking trails and a pond that can be used for skating in the winter months.
A tender call is expected within two weeks to replace the two culverts that go underneath the road on Pitt Street near Edward's Pond. The concrete culverts will be replaced by two double-box culverts sized appropriately to improve drainage.
Devco owns approximately 600 properties covering about 1,000 square kilometres in 35 different communities within Cape Breton. These range from urban lots, forest fields, wetlands and ponds to ocean frontage.
The goal of the remediation program is to leave former mining sites in a stable, safe condition and return them to their former land use or acceptable alternatives.
jcollins@cbpost.com
|
I'm considering writing a response letter on this one.
Quote:
Widely varying predictions of population decline both cause for serious attention
Section: Comment
Column: Jim Guy
By Jim Guy,
Another population study brings another set of numbers to consider about Cape Breton's population decline. In 2004 the Terrain Group of Halifax predicted that by 2021 the population of the Cape Breton Regional Municipality would drop to about 76,000. Just last month, Environmental Design and Management of Halifax presented a somewhat softer prediction with its forecast of population decline at about 93,000 by 2021.
What is interesting about both of these studies is that the same consultant, John Heseltine, was the author.
What are we to make of the different conclusions by this author within such a short period of time? Why would the variables have changed so dramatically for the CBRM in just four years?
And, if the variables haven't changed affecting our population, why have the conclusions changed so significantly?
After all, a predicted difference in CBRM's decline of some 17,000 is the equivalent of losing the current population of Glace Bay. This is no small discrepancy. Which study is the more accurate for the next 13 years of municipal planning? Which should CBRM take more seriously? How should we react in our communities?
A population decline in Cape Breton, whether 76,000 or to 93,000, by 2021 should be of major concern. It should be a concern not only to our local politicians but also to every business and institution in all the communities of people that make up CBRM.
Based on our projected declines, we will experience a degree of social and economic change unprecedented in our history.
Population shrinkage is one thing: it is what happens when not enough children are produced to replace the people who die - not enough cradles and too many coffins. But population decline is quite another: it is a significant, predictable drop in the number of people who live and work in our political communities.
In Cape Breton, population decline is complicated by significant out-migration. The lure of economic opportunity to other parts of Canada, particularly Alberta, is reducing our population. The push factor for out-migration in our case is a decline of economic opportunity here. The residual affects are that we lose the ability to replace our population because, among other things, there is a drop in the number of women (aged 20 to 34) with the best potential to have children.
Even if we were highly successful in attracting people back to the island who are in the age set of 40 to 60, we would not do much to sustain or reverse our population decline.
For the more than 100 communities that make up CBRM to survive a decline of the magnitudes suggested in both studies, every effort needs to be made to identify what variables actually contribute most to the down-draw.
The critical mass for CBRM is about 100,000. The 2006 census recorded 106,000 living in CBRM. Falling below that number, whether it be by 13,000 or 30,000, will become a major psychological barrier for businesses and professionals living here.
A urban population that fails to grow as ours does is not just a demographic problem. It is an urgent economic, social and political problem. It needs to be taken seriously at a number of levels.
Population decline affects how communities are governed, the size of our local markets, economic opportunities for young people, the vibrancy of school system and the university, and the capacity to sustain an attractive urban or rural infrastructure.
On the matter of local governance, given that we are losing people in significant numbers across the island, should we even consider reducing the size of our municipal council by half? Should this council not be holding firm on its 16 members to effectively address population decline in the communities they represent? Will "smaller" enable us to attract new professionals and businesses, market our tourist industry better, or build a strategy to control population decline?
CBRM is the only urban area in all of Canada losing its people and experiencing almost permanent economic recession. Population decline places the highest tax burden on remaining residents on the island compared with the rest of Nova Scotia and Canada. Yet, Halifax accounts for 47 per cent of Nova Scotia's GDP and draws our people away the same way that Alberta does.
Based on its present population, CBRM shows an average family income of $48,300 compared with $83,300 for Ottawa and $70,300 for Halifax. This would indicate a substantial disparity in economic advantage for those who might want to come here and for those remaining here when comparing lifestyles in these other communities.
Even though we are exporting our labour to other cities, the unemployment rate for Cape Breton is still very high at about 17 per cent, compared with 5.8 for Ottawa and 5.1 for Halifax. All other major urban areas listed by Statistics Canada are experiencing population growth while CBRM and the rest of Cape Breton are in serious decline.
In addition to bare-bones funding to operate CBRM as it losses its taxpayers, the council continues to face increased fiscal pressures from the off-loading of services and unfunded mandates from other levels of government.
CBRM has had to take a greater role in the many areas of shared interests with the federal government: ports and harbours, social housing, public safety, emergency preparedness and transit.
Amidst all of this, CBRM needs to develop its infrastructure to attract investment and keep its population from declining. Central services, such as good roads, housing, parks and recreation, arts and culture, public transportation and safety all play a role in attracting people here. CBRM must replace and refurbish aging infrastructure to try to remain competitive.
If governments do not take this problem seriously, who will? And which population studies should we use to develop our strategy to reverse the problem?
Jim Guy, PhD, is a professor of political science at Cape Breton University.
|
Some predictable reactions to yesterday's Vogue commentary
Quote:
Fighting for culture like chasing a wave
Section: Comment
Column: Letters to the editor
"Moribund" means "dying," folks, in case you're not familiar with the description of the beautiful Vogue theatre. In the words of Terry MacLean, PhD, "the derelict building makes downtown Sydney look moribund, which it is not" (Preserve the Memories, Not the Vogue Hulk, Letters, March 11). Really? That's his opinion! Almost all buildings on Charlotte Street have had deceptive facelifts, giving the illusion only of structural soundness and safety.
Please don't malign the perfectly viable Vogue building, one of the few places with any past elegance in Cape Breton. There are other places, largely unused since constructed, where offices could be more suitably housed in the Sydney area.
My interest is admittedly sentimental and nostalgic. My remembered childhood and beyond were spent on Saturdays in the other world of the Vogue and Paramount theatres. The beauty and elegance of the Vogue could rival any visions of New York theatres.
Then there were the operettas, with Ann Terry MacLellan officiating on opening nights. My mother was in those productions; I never knew that my school friend, Dougie Vail, was the nephew of my mom's childhood friend, Ardath MacDonald Dockwrey.
I choose not to get too involved with the ongoing struggle to "save the Vogue" because there usually has been nothing to be gained in trying to fight for anything good and lasting and cultural in Sydney since its beginnings. It's like trying to catch a wave in the ocean.
Nevertheless, I do wish all the best to Jason Morrison in his endeavours and to the 4,000-plus supporters, of whom my daughter, Mandy, is one. I only hope the worthy quest is not in vain.
Sharen Archibald-Ardelli
Howie Centre
|
Quote:
Progress doesn't mean just tearing down the old
Section: Comment
Column: Letters to the editor
Cape Breton indeed has more serious issues to deal with than the tearing down of the Vogue theatre. Sadly though, when the community does try to do something for itself, big business says "No way" and tells us we are interfering with progress.
I think a community getting organizing and raising funds to revitalize a building ignored by the business community is progress. I think giving people a reason to go downtown all year long and bringing life back to the downtown is progress.
How many jobs are going to be created in the proposed office building? Are new companies going to fill the vacancies that exist in office buildings all over town? Is the small business starting out here in the city going to be able to afford space in this new office building?
I wonder if the new tenants will appreciate the memorabilia on the wall representing a once beautiful theatre. Perhaps the people who are going to work in this new building will encourage tourists to come in and see what was once going to be a thriving community arts centre.
Robin Jensen
Sydney
|
This is the point in the post where I'd usually rant about the above two stories, but I don't have the energy to today.
|
|
|