HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3241  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 2:27 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is online now
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
^^^ it probably can't be developed now because the standing water in the pit is the breeding ground to some endangered mosquito species or something.
They're a precious part of our urban ecosystem. The rarest of all mosquitoes, the yellow-crested red river mosquito!
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3242  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 2:35 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,553
The Provincial bird
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3243  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 4:20 PM
Rutlander Rutlander is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
^^^ it probably can't be developed now because the standing water in the pit is the breeding ground to some endangered mosquito species or something.
Save our wetlands!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3244  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 5:07 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,743
The people on Shaftsbury protesting against the proposed multi-family building would say "Save our Parks" regarding the open space behind this proposed Osborne building.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3245  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 5:13 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,221
and considering the nice little heritage building that they tore down for it as well....
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3246  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 5:49 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,553
Giant holes abandoned by developers and foundations with unstarted/unfinished buildings in them is quickly becoming part of our heritage though, so you could say it was an even trade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3247  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 2:12 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,299
Looks like the project at Scott/Wardlaw is seeking to convert its ground floor CRUs into additional residential units mid-build.

Hearings item #5: https://clkapps.winnipeg.ca/DMIS/Vie...onId=&InitUrl=

Not sure if this is because of lots of demand for residential units... or just weakness in the retail/commercial market. It's a bit of a weird location for retail/commercial since it's a residential street without a lot of foot traffic or visibility. I could see one CRU with a convenience store or dentist's office or something locally focused but I'd imagine 3 CRUs in that location would be tough
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3248  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 2:26 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ New streetfront CRUs that aren't part of a strip mall or something else with a parking lot directly attached seem almost unleaseable IMO. For all the MURB development happening around town, so little of it seems to have any commercial space, and the ones that do often take forever to get leased. I assume this has to do with high lease rates for new space?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3249  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 2:40 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,743
I have to say that as slow as Private Pension Partners Inc has been on the development of the ZU on Osborne - building fronting Osborne is now up to floor 5 and installing full floor glazing on the main floor - they are actually getting started on the phase 2 building across the street (Wardlaw). I figured that for sure it would become one of those typical future phases that never gets built in Winnipeg.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3250  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 2:45 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ New streetfront CRUs that aren't part of a strip mall or something else with a parking lot directly attached seem almost unleaseable IMO. For all the MURB development happening around town, so little of it seems to have any commercial space, and the ones that do often take forever to get leased. I assume this has to do with high lease rates for new space?
Here's the thing.

The city wants mixed use zoning. So it encourages CRUs as part of MFR buildings. The idea is that residential areas will have shopping and services in a walkable distance.

But they haven't done anything else, really, to restrict the development of large power centres and other single-use commercial zoning with heavy parking minimums. The focus of the city budget is still speeding up car traffic between neighbourhoods.

In other words, the city hopes that forcing residential developers to add commercial units to its buildings will create mixed neighbourhoods. But it undermines mixed neighbourhoods by zoning, planning, and spending in ways that encourages people to drive to shop. Even in OV, a purportedly "walkable" neighbourhood right near downtown, more than half of residents still commute by car to work. None of the mixed-use zoning will have much effect if the city as a whole still builds everything around the needs, preferences, and priorities of drivers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3251  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 3:03 PM
xubiqtss xubiqtss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by borkborkbork View Post
Here's the thing.

The city wants mixed use zoning. So it encourages CRUs as part of MFR buildings. The idea is that residential areas will have shopping and services in a walkable distance.

But they haven't done anything else, really, to restrict the development of large power centres and other single-use commercial zoning with heavy parking minimums. The focus of the city budget is still speeding up car traffic between neighbourhoods.

In other words, the city hopes that forcing residential developers to add commercial units to its buildings will create mixed neighbourhoods. But it undermines mixed neighbourhoods by zoning, planning, and spending in ways that encourages people to drive to shop. Even in OV, a purportedly "walkable" neighbourhood right near downtown, more than half of residents still commute by car to work. None of the mixed-use zoning will have much effect if the city as a whole still builds everything around the needs, preferences, and priorities of drivers.
Forcing residential developers to include commercial may not change the city as a whole but it's still very important to fostering a finer grained neighbourhood. Not all businesses need tons of foot traffic. Small professionals' offices would be great there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3252  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 4:10 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,013
^ agreed - but this space comes at a premium because it is new construction. It makes it hard to find tenants willing to pay higher rates and hard for the developer to justify the loss of doors on the residential side.

High interest rates and construction costs make all developments go on razor thin margins right now, and requiring CRUs (that will likely just sit empty) can make or break projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3253  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 4:33 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I have to say that as slow as Private Pension Partners Inc has been on the development of the ZU on Osborne - building fronting Osborne is now up to floor 5 and installing full floor glazing on the main floor - they are actually getting started on the phase 2 building across the street (Wardlaw). I figured that for sure it would become one of those typical future phases that never gets built in Winnipeg.
really?!....that is great news! I was also not holding hope that it would happen soon....that's going to be a game changer development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3254  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 5:08 PM
lbnevs lbnevs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
really?!....that is great news! I was also not holding hope that it would happen soon....that's going to be a game changer development.
They cleared the site on the south side of Wardlaw (Vitahealth parking lot) a few weeks back and moved a pile driver onto the site.

However, they've now moved construction materials back onto the site. The pile driver is just sitting there. That's gotta be an expensive rental!

That said, even though it's slow, it's looking good. The retail unit on the main level has super high ceilings and floor to ceiling windows along Osborne. I hope they find a tenant, because it would be an amazing restaurant location. The little "woonerf" type alley between the buildings looks like it's going to be good.

More than anything, it's amazing how much building there is. You don't realize how wasted parking lots etc are until you see what can fit in the same footprint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3255  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 6:08 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,553
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3256  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 6:37 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by borkborkbork View Post
Here's the thing.

The city wants mixed use zoning. So it encourages CRUs as part of MFR buildings. The idea is that residential areas will have shopping and services in a walkable distance.

But they haven't done anything else, really, to restrict the development of large power centres and other single-use commercial zoning with heavy parking minimums. The focus of the city budget is still speeding up car traffic between neighbourhoods.

In other words, the city hopes that forcing residential developers to add commercial units to its buildings will create mixed neighbourhoods. But it undermines mixed neighbourhoods by zoning, planning, and spending in ways that encourages people to drive to shop. Even in OV, a purportedly "walkable" neighbourhood right near downtown, more than half of residents still commute by car to work. None of the mixed-use zoning will have much effect if the city as a whole still builds everything around the needs, preferences, and priorities of drivers.
agreed.

It will be interesting to see how the ground floor commercial leases in the two new buildings on Osborne.

My experience on Des Meurons is that the mom and pop shops can't afford a complete tenant fit up cost and chains demand dedicated parking....that building isn't on a commercial strip per se, so we will see if Osborne has enough draw to overcome that....i really hope it does. I would be totally fine with a few chain stores on Osborne....as long as its not another seriues of pot stores.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3257  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2023, 6:38 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
I'm definitely ok with a building at Scott/Wardlaw not having retail storefronts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3258  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2023, 7:34 PM
ColdRain&Snow's Avatar
ColdRain&Snow ColdRain&Snow is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 459
Anyone know what's going on with the proposed building at 350 River Ave? The old building was knocked down back in December and the lot has been an empty pit ever since.
__________________
"Build baby build."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3259  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2023, 9:21 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
Anyone know what's going on with the proposed building at 350 River Ave? The old building was knocked down back in December and the lot has been an empty pit ever since.
Most recently approved and permit issued in June 2021, after years of wrangling with the city, appeals from neighbours, etc.

What was approved is 5 regular units and 10 single-room-occupancy units (small half bathroom in each, shared main bathroom and shared kitchen). At the project's inception, the idea was that these would be affordable units priced at $600 a month.

Here was the rendering as of 2021:



I don't know anything about the economics of this project, but the original plan was 30 SRO units and the approved plan was only 10 SRO + 5 MFR. That's a lot fewer doors, and meanwhile we've had two years of double-digit construction inflation.

I wonder if the feasibility just isn't there anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3260  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2023, 12:44 PM
lbnevs lbnevs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 102
Last night I walked by that white office building at confusion corner. The sign says 80% leased. But looking up, it still appears like there's at least three floors that are just empty shells.

Has a lot been leased, and is just in the process of being fitted out for the tenants? I otherwise can't reconcile what appears to be a nearly fully leased and yet completely vacant building, lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.