HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2321  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 12:27 AM
Arm&Kedzie Arm&Kedzie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 132
^ Are there any suburb office relocations on the radar? It seems many companies are starting to understand the younger workforce doesn't like living/working in the burbs

Will McDonalds ever move downtown?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2322  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 2:44 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,829
i moved the talk about rahm to the chicago politics thread. please continue the discussion there.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=213683
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2323  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 7:16 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,237
Crain's is reporting the Wood Partners site in the south loop (between the British School and Polk St against the Metra ROW) has landed construction financing for their 500 unit apt tower.

All I can remember about this is a fuzzy rendering of what appeared to be K2's even cheaper looking cousin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2324  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 7:25 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
Crain's is reporting the Wood Partners site in the south loop (between the British School and Polk St against the Metra ROW) has landed construction financing for their 500 unit apt tower.

All I can remember about this is a fuzzy rendering of what appeared to be K2's even cheaper looking cousin.
Holy crapola! That came out of nowhere.

I'd love to see an updated design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2325  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 7:36 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Pretty sure it was this proposal that I posted on 7/20
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...-for-developer

Quote:
Atlanta-based developer Wood Partners has landed a $96 million construction loan for an apartment project north of the Roosevelt Collection, according to Cook County property records. In December, the city approved a 33-story building with 496 units that Wood had proposed on the vacant site along the Metra tracks south of Polk Street.
Barring any snags with permitting, no reason this one shouldn't start in the near future.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2326  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 10:18 PM
ChickeNES's Avatar
ChickeNES ChickeNES is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 442
Speaking of the Roosevelt Collection, has anyone heard anything regarding the residential tower planned for the NW corner?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2327  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 10:27 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickeNES View Post
Speaking of the Roosevelt Collection, has anyone heard anything regarding the residential tower planned for the NW corner?
Pretty sure what I just posted above is that tower. Roosevelt Collection sold the lot to the developer listed in the article.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2328  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 10:30 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickeNES View Post
Speaking of the Roosevelt Collection, has anyone heard anything regarding the residential tower planned for the NW corner?
^ Is that not the same one?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2329  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 10:39 PM
ChickeNES's Avatar
ChickeNES ChickeNES is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 442
^, ^^
I'm talking about the site bounded in green, not the one in red:


The article is describing the red site:
Quote:
Designed by Pappageorge Haymes Partners, Wood's building would include 348 parking spaces, a fourth-floor pool and deck and sit immediately north of the British School of Chicago, according to a letter from the city to Wood's attorney.
The green site was originally supposed to have this thing:

http://www.cristinatudor.com/uploads...47574_orig.jpg

Last edited by ChickeNES; Jan 12, 2016 at 10:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2330  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 3:18 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
347-357 N. Halsted is going to be 450 feet

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2331  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 5:09 AM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
347-357 N. Halsted is going to be 450 feet
Looks like 450 ft was already announced at the public meeting on Nov. 3.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2332  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 6:17 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
All the 3D renderings online of the Halsted tower show this one avoiding the Hubbard cave. It's going to create quite the moat.....literally with the drawbridge-looking entrance. It might look cool or terrible. But the massing of the tower is nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2333  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 1:31 PM
lakeviewer lakeviewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Montrose/Clarendon

Looks like Montrose/Clarendon passed community development commission, does this mean TIF funds were approved?
http://www.uptownupdate.com/2016/01/...-approved.html

agenda:
http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...C_Jan_2016.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2334  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 2:24 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeviewer View Post
Looks like Montrose/Clarendon passed community development commission, does this mean TIF funds were approved?
http://www.uptownupdate.com/2016/01/...-approved.html

agenda:
http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...C_Jan_2016.pdf
The TIF funding got the ok from the Community Development Comission, still needs the vote from the city council but given that it passed unanimously seems like a done deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2335  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 3:13 PM
lakeviewer lakeviewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
The TIF funding got the ok from the Community Development Comission, still needs the vote from the city council but given that it passed unanimously seems like a done deal.
Great, thanks for the insight. This neighborhoods needs to see some market rate development badly, hopefully it will spur more interest from other developers as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2336  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 7:15 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
All the 3D renderings online of the Halsted tower show this one avoiding the Hubbard cave. It's going to create quite the moat.....literally with the drawbridge-looking entrance. It might look cool or terrible. But the massing of the tower is nice.
Also the high-speed rail alignment between this and K2 (currently a temporary dog park). This building will definitely have a moat.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2337  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 1:08 PM
chrisvfr800i chrisvfr800i is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 308
New Essex Hotel drawings....

55 stories, 575.17' to top of parapet. Stilts still there, but simplified.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2338  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 1:39 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
^Thanks for the info. Original proposal was stated to be 48 stories + 388 units, according to Crains. Have we gained some height?

Really hope they don't "refine" those stilts by too much..



Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2339  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 1:45 PM
chrisvfr800i chrisvfr800i is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 308
[QUOTE=Skyguy_7;7298869]^Thanks for the info. Original proposal was stated to be 48 stories + 388 units, according to Crains. Have we gained some height?

Really hope they don't "refine" those stilts by too much..

They did.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2340  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 2:39 PM
ChiTownWonder's Avatar
ChiTownWonder ChiTownWonder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 618
Those stilts are probably just straight up and down now
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:52 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.