HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2021, 3:48 PM
Manitopiaaa Manitopiaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alexandria, Royal Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 494
A Decade of Housing Affordability (Housing Affordability Survey 2010-2020)

I decided to pore through the Demographia Housing Affordability Survey scores to see how housing has fared this past decade. I only coded in North American cities (as I'll be cross-posting to a North America-only forum), but wanted to share the results here. The "survey" isn't actually a survey, simply a compilation of Median Home Price/Median Household Income:



New York has actually gotten cheaper in the past decade, while Philadelphia (+0.1 since 2010) has barely budged. In the Northeast, the only two that have grown more unaffordable are Boston and Washington, though in both cases the trends are moderate (+1.1 and +0.8, respectively).

As expected the biggest increases are in the West Coast and Canada, with Toronto being the #1 city for housing unaffordability growth. Vancouver is #2 at 3.5, followed by Los Angeles, Las Vegas and San Jose. It does look like the California housing exodus is having some impact, as Los Angeles and San Diego both became more affordable in the past 5 years.

There were also notable increases in the Sunbelt, as the metro areas largely left the <3 range and began to climb up in unaffordability.

Any other trends I missed?

Last edited by Manitopiaaa; Sep 11, 2021 at 4:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2021, 4:39 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,894
Austin, Dallas, and Houston are roughly similar. I didn't expect that.

Quick take: if the city averages below a 3 for all 10 years, then it's either a very sprawly or very depressed market. If it averages above 6, the city isn't building enough housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2021, 4:55 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
the city isn't building enough housing.
City governments don't and shouldn't build housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2021, 5:03 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
City governments don't and shouldn't build housing.

No, but they can set policy that makes it easier or harder for others to build.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2021, 5:07 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
City governments don't and shouldn't build housing.
Do you really think I didn't know that? lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.