HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


Salesforce Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1181  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2014, 1:39 AM
texcolo's Avatar
texcolo texcolo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
Posts: 4,304
They're lucking out because of the frozen ground and clay.
__________________
"I am literally grasping at straws." - Bob Belcher
     
     
  #1182  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 3:42 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Jan 9 - 2014

Outlineing the garage ?


Sheet Pile vibrator.





Nice clay
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1183  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2014, 2:31 AM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Sun-Times building is moving out from the apparel building.

http://www.chicagorealestatedaily.co...-mulls-hq-move

Think maybe Wolf Point beginning contstruction made Sun-Times consider their current office space unsatisfactory?
     
     
  #1184  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2014, 5:17 AM
Pilton Pilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 281
^ Rather, maybe the Sun-Times cannot afford to pay Downtown rent anymore?
     
     
  #1185  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 2:44 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Jan 17



__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1186  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 3:04 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,288
I really wish now that the Sun Times lease is up that they would just tear down the Apparel Mart and use it as part of this project!
     
     
  #1187  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 3:18 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
I really wish now that the Sun Times lease is up that they would just tear down the Apparel Mart and use it as part of this project!
You'll have to chat to Chris Kennedy about that.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #1188  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 3:35 AM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
i like the idea of the apparel mart next to shiny new glass towers.
     
     
  #1189  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 3:40 AM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
I've been wondering how hard Holiday Inn would fight to keep that location once Wolf Point goes up. I guess even without the view it's a good location to have, but the building itself ain't that great. Maybe once WP is totally complete that area of town will be more lively and not feel so remote, and Apparel will be worth renovating or replacing. But until then I can't imagine Kennedy or anybody would want to spend much time thinking about that building or lot.
     
     
  #1190  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 12:12 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,434
01/23/14







__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #1191  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 3:07 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,288
I really have to question what they were ever thinking when they designed the Apparel Mart. At the time i believe they owned both properties, Apparel Mart and Wolf Point, why would you ever not only build that ugly building but also just leave the prime riverfront point for a parking lot? They really missed the boat on this spot in my opinion.
     
     
  #1192  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 3:29 AM
markh9's Avatar
markh9 markh9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 132
@ BVictor1 & wierdaaron, just a heads up that the Kennedy's don't own the Apparel Center anymore. They sold it in 1998 to Vornado, then Shorenstein Properties bought it from Vornado last year.

Source: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...center-closes#
     
     
  #1193  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 3:37 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by markh9 View Post
@ BVictor1 & wierdaaron, just a heads up that the Kennedy's don't own the Apparel Center anymore. They sold it in 1998 to Vornado, then Shorenstein Properties bought it from Vornado last year.

Source: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...center-closes#
I'm aware.

And the Kennedy's are shareholders in Vornado.

They sold the building to themselves.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #1194  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 3:46 AM
markh9's Avatar
markh9 markh9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 132
Ha, okay then! Gotta love rich people.
     
     
  #1195  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 3:56 AM
Pilton Pilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
I'm aware.

And the Kennedy's are shareholders in Vornado.

They sold the building to themselves.
So, essentially, when the Kennedys sold off the view corridors to the Apparel Mart they sold them off to themselves. Sleight of hand - but doesn't matter now.
     
     
  #1196  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 7:11 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Great pics B-Vic

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
I really have to question what they were ever thinking when they designed the Apparel Mart. At the time i believe they owned both properties, Apparel Mart and Wolf Point, why would you ever not only build that ugly building but also just leave the prime riverfront point for a parking lot? They really missed the boat on this spot in my opinion.
IIRC "apparel mart" was originally a windowless AT&T switching facility.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1197  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 8:13 AM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Yeah, there were no windows at all, but they knocked some out for the Holiday Inn on the top few floors. Then when Sun Times moved in they added windows to those floors. I think I remember a boat tour guide saying something about the originally windowless offices being some kind of modern/brutalist statement about the needlessness of sunlight in a world with electric lighting. I thought it was originally overflow storage for wares that didn't fit in merch mart.
     
     
  #1198  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 1:55 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post
Great pics B-Vic



IIRC "apparel mart" was originally a windowless AT&T switching facility.
As far as I know Apparel Mart was never anything of the sort. It was designed explicitly to be an extension of Merchandise Mart for the eponymous purpose of wholesale Apparel sales. I also believe the hotel has always been up there (and wikipedia corroborates this). The reason the building is windowless is epitomizes the worst mistakes of high modernism where the statement "form follows function" was taken to the extreme and we wound up with architects asking the question "do Apparel wholesalers really need windows"? And the obvious solution, in their minds, being "no of course they don't need windows, let's just build a building without windows".

Of course the great irony of that is that they later signed a deal to "preserve view corridors" which raises the question "Views? From what windows?" I think the answer to that question is probably "From the windows on the shiny new building we are going to build here in the not too distant future"...

They could always punch out the concrete, but when you look at the costs of doing major rehab, structural rehab, on a building of this age especially one built to serve such a specific purpose, I doubt that will ever make financial sense. Though Apparel Mart with the lower floors punched out for windows would not be nearly as much of an abomination as it is today.
     
     
  #1199  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 2:11 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
Yeah, there were no windows at all, but they knocked some out for the Holiday Inn on the top few floors. Then when Sun Times moved in they added windows to those floors. I think I remember a boat tour guide saying something about the originally windowless offices being some kind of modern/brutalist statement about the needlessness of sunlight in a world with electric lighting. I thought it was originally overflow storage for wares that didn't fit in merch mart.
The boat tour guides are funny: always slightly exaggerating mostly true facts. As Mr. VanDerWright said above, it was designed for showrooms. Here's a picture from around the time when it opened:

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/201...0011283643766/

It is kind of cool and striking in that picture, even if it doesn't have the same effect up close in person.
     
     
  #1200  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2014, 2:47 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,388
It wasn't a postulate of modernism. Apparel display and south-facing windows simply don't mix, at least before new window coatings were developed in the last 20 years. You see the same thing in every postwar department store: no exterior windows. Look at Water Tower Place.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.