HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 6:46 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Elizabeth May has spoken more than any single MP in Parliament during Question Period, including Stephan Harper (this is from official records of Parliament). She was elected the "Parliamentarian of the year" by members of Parliament themselves this week.

I also disagree with May's take on certain issues, but I respect her commitment to the fundamentals of democracy and Parliament.
During question period? No, that is not possible. No way, no how. During everything else? Totally possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 6:58 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Independants don't get anything in HoC. If they get to survive an election (exclude independants who are thrown out of their caucus) its usually due to a very usual local riding situation. Nenshi could run as an independant in Calgary Centre and win on name recognition.

If Turner wants into politics, he should consider running for Councillor in the next election (remember this is the last year when Alderman will be used as the job descriptor).

Let's crowd source Turners next gig - City of Calgary Councillor.
I would like to see Chris Turner take on Richard Pootmans or John Mar. Dale Hodges should also be unseated, but I think it's most likely to be done by Chris Harper. Urquhart needs to go as well. Of the new councillors, I think Carra and Keating have done the best job so far. I would like to see more councillors championing urban cycling boulevards as I think this is something that can be done relatively cheaply, if done right will improve transportation option choices, and has major potential to improve quality of life (health).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:05 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Answers:

(1) My viewpoint is inner city wards - 7, 8, 9. Alternates are wards where the LRT/BRT is early stages of maturit - 6 (there will be a lot of work over the next 5 years to get WLRT ridership to capacity, thisn includes stick handling complaints from people who preferred previous bus network, PnR users, and road users who might need to be inconvenienced and persuaded onto LRT), 9 and 12 (SELRT and SETWAY), 7 and 4 (NCLRT and busy BRT line).

(2) Hodges and Lowe are ready for retirement. Chabot has repeatedly been on lists of wanting to do other jobs (like mayor). Colley-Urquhart has tried to get into other things.

(3) Don't know the man, perhaps others could provide a better viewpoint.

(4) I would like Turner to give the boots to Farrell, Pootmans, or Pincott.

That said if Turner got the right desire and platform to represent ward 2 (lowe), I would vote for him and volunteer extensively on his team. I just don't know if Turner wants to represent a suburb riding, I think he is an urbanist at heart.
Agreed about giving the boot to Pootmans. I actually like Farrell quite a bit and Pincott while directionally I like him, watching him in chamber is almost painful and he is not effective. Carra and Keating are already firmly pro-transit and are supportive of the SE LRT construction; I can't think of any better advocates. Chabot has very high levels of support in his ward and is reasonable and asks a lot of questions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:06 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Chris Turner's marketing team continues to do quite the spectacular job, especially Brian Singh, the man behind 1CalgaryCentre and key to Chris' campaign.
http://www.1calgarycentre.com/news/

Brian is kind of like the scientist producing fantastic reports about why milk fat is not bad for you, while being on the dairy farmers association payroll. None the less, the propaganda machine seems to be working.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:11 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
I honestly can't make sense of any of this now, Monday is going to be a crap shoot and I think it will be close.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:22 PM
artvandelay's Avatar
artvandelay artvandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The City of Cows
Posts: 1,670
The premier of Quebec seems open to east to west pipeline expansion. Who would have though that a separatist PQ leader would show more rationality on the subject than the Liberal premier of BC?

Quote:
Alberta’s Alison Redford and Quebec’s Pauline Marois announced late Thursday that they will create a working group to exchange economic and environmental information on natural resource development that will shape discussions over the possibility of oilsands crude heading east.

On Friday, a number of premiers gathered at the Council of the Federation meeting on the economy lauded the move by Alberta and Quebec as a good step in trying to create an east-west oil pipeline network that could increase Canadian energy security.

Manitoba Premier Greg Selinger said his province is very supportive of moving western Canadian crude into Central Canada and the Atlantic provinces, and believes it could be an economic boon for the entire country.
Read more in the Herald...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:36 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
I honestly can't make sense of any of this now, Monday is going to be a crap shoot and I think it will be close.
Realistically only Crockatt and Locke have a chance to win. Best Turner can do is 2nd place.

This is however a get out the vote fight right now. Any of the top three candidates fails to get thier supporters into the voting booth will not win the election. This includes the conservatives war machine.

Turner's downfall will be that he cannot pull votes from the Liberals. Turner has been sucessfull at getting support from Conservatives and NDP, but the Liberal vote has remained constant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:43 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia View Post
Chris Turner's marketing team continues to do quite the spectacular job, especially Brian Singh, the man behind 1CalgaryCentre and key to Chris' campaign.
http://www.1calgarycentre.com/news/

Brian is kind of like the scientist producing fantastic reports about why milk fat is not bad for you, while being on the dairy farmers association payroll. None the less, the propaganda machine seems to be working.
Brian Singh is not working for the Turner campaign. 1CalgaryCentre is a registered third party and thus follows all the rules as per the Elections Act. Any members of 1CalgaryCentre that have been involved in any campaign have been asked to leave the organization.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 7:54 PM
simster3 simster3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 286
I'm traditionally Liberal but am considering switching to Green as the air feels like he has the most support and almost the best chance at winning. I could be completely wrong and throwing my vote away. It is a difficult choice this time. I know the Liberals claim that it is a two way race but in my opinion its definitely 3 way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 8:59 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
One of the things I'm having a hard time reconciling is the demographics of these polls versus what I am observing. Turner's facebook page has his support mostly coming from 25-34 year olds. From the Return on Insight poll, I'm suprised that young Albertans are so likely to vote Conservative, and secondly, that young Albertans are more likely to place their second choice as NDP over Liberal or Green.

I'm curious as to why the two groups that have the least amount of engagement online (Conservative & NDP) are polling so high in this demographic...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 9:15 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,578
^ Self selected versus a random sample.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 9:37 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Brian Singh is not working for the Turner campaign. 1CalgaryCentre is a registered third party and thus follows all the rules as per the Elections Act. Any members of 1CalgaryCentre that have been involved in any campaign have been asked to leave the organization.
Don't get me wrong, I'm certain all is above the board and that there are no formal ties.

On a related note, here is a more scientific poll:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/poli...-centre-by-election-poll/article5609301/

Quote:
Originally Posted by simster3 View Post
I'm traditionally Liberal but am considering switching to Green as the air feels like he has the most support and almost the best chance at winning. I could be completely wrong and throwing my vote away. It is a difficult choice this time. I know the Liberals claim that it is a two way race but in my opinion its definitely 3 way.
I don't think it is just the Liberals saying it is a two way race. The scientific polls are quite clear about this. Here is the absolute latest, just reported by the Globe and Mail in the article linked to above:

Quote:
Conservative candidate Joan Crockatt, who had the nod of 37 per cent of respondents, was holding a five-point lead over Harvey Locke of the Liberals. That suggests Ms. Crockatt‘s support has slipped significantly from the 48 per cent support she registered less than a month ago in another poll of the riding.

Green party candidate Chris Turner was running third in the ROI poll with 17 per cent of the decided vote and Dan Meades of the New Democrats was fourth with 12 per cent.
So to be clear, currently it looks like this:

PC - Crockatt - 37%
*************************************
Liberal - Locke - 32%
********************************
Green - Turner - 17%
*****************
NDP - Meades - 12%
************


It is clearly a two horse race, Turner doubling his support would leave him short and his momentum has shifted to the down side in a big way. Turner climaxed too early.

The election may come down to the Ralph Nader effect.

Last edited by suburbia; Nov 23, 2012 at 11:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 10:05 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
I really despise this Joan Crockett; heres why: Her stupid attack ad flyer that was delivered to my mail. It was all lies and quotes from the other parties to rile people up. This style of politics needs to end.......Something about "Harper and Joan are the only proud canadians running in this election" "The other parties will ruin Calgary and turn it into a hellhole with no economy..."

Eff off Joan, your tactics only work on old people.
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 10:20 PM
RyLucky's Avatar
RyLucky RyLucky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,498
the municipal government is already "Turner minded". We need more representation like this on the provincial and federal stage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 10:27 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by kw5150 View Post
"The other parties will ruin Calgary and turn it into a hellhole with no economy..."
Well that one is somewhat true. Calgary's ecomony is more biased towards the private sector than any other city in Canada. Expansion of the federal government be it through increased spending or regulation would likely have a less favorable impact in Calgary than elsewhere. It all comes down to how much you believe the Conservatives would be less likely to increase regulation, taxes or debt relative to the other parties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 10:35 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,578
^ You know who shrunk government a lot? The Liberal Party.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 10:36 PM
artvandelay's Avatar
artvandelay artvandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The City of Cows
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyLucky View Post
the municipal government is already "Turner minded". We need more representation like this on the provincial and federal stage.
I normally vote for more liberal minded politicians at the municipal level because it is civic politicians who make the important decisions that affect the liveability of the city. Having said that, I believe it's important to have politicians at the provincial and federal levels with a high degree of financial acumen as it is these levels of government that have the power to implement policies that affect the economy on a macro level. My point being that you shouldn't expect a change in the federal and provincial voting trends based on municipal politics; Calgary has a long history of electing liberal mayors and aldermen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 11:56 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by artvandelay View Post
I normally vote for more liberal minded politicians at the municipal level because it is civic politicians who make the important decisions that affect the liveability of the city. Having said that, I believe it's important to have politicians at the provincial and federal levels with a high degree of financial acumen as it is these levels of government that have the power to implement policies that affect the economy on a macro level.
I think the thesis you're building upon above is absolutely false. There is no correlation between the right and business acumen OR the left and the lack there of. If you look at the municipal race, as an example, any thoughtful observer would note that the centrist Nenshi has arguably the highest level of business acumen of any mayor in Calgary's history, whereas his right leaning adversary, Dr. No, was a trained butcher. Taking this a pinch further, I think you'd find that the Liberal cabinets of the recent past have been far more educated, including in economics, as compared to the right-leaning conservative cabinets of virtually any time in history. The graph posted by Malcom demonstrates the outcome quite nicely.

I do agree at a general level that education and business acumen should be a consideration when assessing who you vote for, unless you want another Rob Anders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2012, 7:13 PM
RyLucky's Avatar
RyLucky RyLucky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by artvandelay View Post
I normally vote for more liberal minded politicians at the municipal level because it is civic politicians who make the important decisions that affect the liveability of the city. Having said that, I believe it's important to have politicians at the provincial and federal levels with a high degree of financial acumen as it is these levels of government that have the power to implement policies that affect the economy on a macro level. My point being that you shouldn't expect a change in the federal and provincial voting trends based on municipal politics; Calgary has a long history of electing liberal mayors and aldermen.
Turner has written a book on sustainable economy. Crockett has spent most of her career in media.

We can have all the bleeding-heart urbanists we want in city council, but unless the province and the feds start to see things in the same way we'll never get funding for projects like the SELRT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2012, 5:33 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Well - given it is voting day, will leave the politics aside and instead just say that if you are in Calgary-Centre, get out there and vote. There is no excuse for not participating. This thing could be a nail biter. Luckily the ballots are not chad based!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.