Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier
They didn't just miss round one, they literally showed up a week before the final judging with a proposal that literally ignored every bit of guidance DRWC had been giving for the five years previous to that point. Like it's all archived on this forum, for God's sakes. There has been nothing remotely serious about any Sixers proposal up to this point and we're right to laugh them off.
And no, I'm not pessimistic about Philly, I'm pessimistic that the Sixers ownership is presenting something that isn't just smoke and mirrors. That's what I'm pessimistic about.
|
I think the biggest problem from a design standpoint with the sixers arena proposal on the waterfront was the fact that it included an arena. Besides this unavoidable issue, what exactly was wrong with the sixers proposal? What went against DRWC Guidance?
The biggest problem overall with the proposal was that it included nearly a billion in public financing and they were rightly attacked for it, and it seems like they actually did learn their lesson. We'll see what the details entail, but right now, this is being touted as being 100% privately financed.
Listen I don't want to sit here and tell you trust Josh Harris. I don't think many people can become billionaires and retain much decency and he certainly doesn't seem like a exception. But one thing I'll trust a billionaire to do is try to grab more power and money. Building a center city arena would make Josh Harris more wealthy. You can think the plans are bad or whatever you want, but it's baffling why you think the sixers aren't serious in their pursuit for a new arena. What would they possibly gain from this charade?