I generally like Kelley, but he's pretty simple minded on some issues; this one in particular. Requiring a developer or potential developer to renovate homes in a neighboring neighborhood is exactly the kind of special interest nonsense that keeps projects like this away from the city. What exactly is Kelley asking for? Does he want BPG to just pick people's homes at random and do a complete renovation for free? If they did buy up a few of the vacant homes and renovate or put up some new units on a few of the vacant lots, should these be sold at a stiff discount because it benefits the community? They should suck it up and take a loss on a home because they want to build near a neighborhood where most people make less than their potential buyers? That is not what a public company is there to do. BPG gives a lot money to the non-profit groups in the city that do build homes for the working poor, and that's acceptable.
The problem with people like Kelley is that he wants it both ways: a safe and stable neighborhood with well-kept homes for working people, but he doesn't want gentrification, which is necessary for a safe and stable neighborhood with well-kept homes. When a project like Justison Landing comes along, people like Kelley talk about how their neighborhood is being threatened with becoming the next Trolley Square where working people can't afford to live. Well, I'm sure the people that own their homes in Browntown are glad to have a new highend project close to their neighborhood because that spill over of more affluenent people may just happen and improve the quality of the neighborhood. Those that rent will be priced out, but that happens to everyone, not just the poor. If my building went condo and I had to buy my unit for $250,000, I'd have to move. I wouldn't cry about it to my council woman, I realize that the owner wants to make his money and I need to find another place to live. That's business.
Sorry to ramble.
Soynog: Welcome to the thread, it's nice to have some people to discuss this stuff with. I couldn't agree with you more about the site of the new Public Works yard for the City. The DuPont site is a horrible choice. It's decisions like that the should anger a neighborhood, not new construction. The City should have put it out by the port or the treatment plant. The parking garage will go on the river side of the condo tower, between the apartment tower and Market Street. Here: