HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2581  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 9:38 PM
wabooba wabooba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
Could be tunnelled
Agreed, and yes, I think that's the best way. But, again, it's $$$$$ the cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2582  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 9:42 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,395
I'd suggest a train that goes Abby > Aldergrove Interchange > TWU > Carvolth (via Highway 1) and ducks into a tunnel to Whalley or Guildford. Less useful, but much cheaper; we can always extend across the Fraser in a decade or two.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2583  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2022, 9:38 AM
bloomtronzero bloomtronzero is offline
Mrs. Joyce Collingwood
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Vancouver-ish
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I'd suggest a train that goes Abby > Aldergrove Interchange > TWU > Carvolth (via Highway 1) and ducks into a tunnel to Whalley or Guildford. Less useful, but much cheaper; we can always extend across the Fraser in a decade or two.
Anything in the Highway 1 right of way could probably be more cheaply done with barrier-separated buses using their own exits and still be as-or-more effective.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2584  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2022, 1:16 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I'd suggest a train that goes Abby > Aldergrove Interchange > TWU > Carvolth (via Highway 1) and ducks into a tunnel to Whalley or Guildford. Less useful, but much cheaper; we can always extend across the Fraser in a decade or two.
Or perhaps instead of heading to Whalley, it tunnels North for a bit and then interlines with the WCE heading to Waterfront ?

I would think that the terminus at Carvolth wouldn't be a selling point to get it done since I imagine that passengers aren't traveling to and from Carvolth and Abbotsford with those final destinations in mind.
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2585  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2022, 6:00 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by wabooba View Post
Agreed, and yes, I think that's the best way. But, again, it's $$$$$ the cost.
Hence why it will be complete in the year 2XXX, hopefully where The Boring Company has innovated tunnelling to the point where it's economically viable to tunnel between Alaska and Russia as well as from Vancouver to Victoria.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2586  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2022, 5:28 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I'd suggest a train that goes Abby > Aldergrove Interchange > TWU > Carvolth (via Highway 1) and ducks into a tunnel to Whalley or Guildford. Less useful, but much cheaper; we can always extend across the Fraser in a decade or two.
Yeah and then a frequent all day bus, or RapidBus if you wanna get spicy, linking the future Langley Centre skytrain station with Carvolth Exchange WCE station via 200th street, and then watch the density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2587  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2022, 7:44 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
Yeah and then a frequent all day bus, or RapidBus if you wanna get spicy, linking the future Langley Centre skytrain station with Carvolth Exchange WCE station via 200th street, and then watch the density.
Bring it all the way to Maple Ridge while you're at it. I believe that's part of Transport 2050.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2588  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2022, 8:31 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Bring it all the way to Maple Ridge while you're at it. I believe that's part of Transport 2050.
You are correct, it's a 5 year plan I believe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2589  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2022, 8:30 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
Very true.

I almost feel like it just needs to be simplified with a renewed local transit master plan. Abbotsford may need to start from scratch with basic North-South, East-West lines aiming for more frequent transit, and then develop subsidiary lines from there.

I am sure that residents would throw a stink if their windey suburban routes directly into Abbotsford Center get kiboshed but the trade-off could be that those new North-South Routes can run at an increased frequency and connect with an East-West line that also runs more frequently as well. This could help develop a spine of transit for Abbotsford ?
The spaghettified road network doesn't help. For a start, they could close off South Fraser Way at Jubilee (drivers will riot, but whatever) and with a few appropriations, connect both sides of McCallum Road; that lets them have an east-west B-Line from Highstreet Mall straight through Sevenoaks and "downtown" to Sumas Mountain and northeast-south from Ten Oaks to UFV. Then maybe later north-southwest from Gladwin to YXX.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2590  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2022, 1:59 AM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,928
-Delete-
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2591  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2022, 2:26 AM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
The spaghettified road network doesn't help. For a start, they could close off South Fraser Way at Jubilee (drivers will riot, but whatever) and with a few appropriations, connect both sides of McCallum Road; that lets them have an east-west B-Line from Highstreet Mall straight through Sevenoaks and "downtown" to Sumas Mountain and northeast-south from Ten Oaks to UFV. Then maybe later north-southwest from Gladwin to YXX.
Without closing off Souther Fraser Way, this is the redesign I came up with using 8/13 bus lines that Abbotsford currently has:



Red - Old Yale Line
Blue - South Fraser Line
Dark Green - Marshall Line
Pink - Maclure Line
Orange - Clearbrook Line
Light Green - Gladwin Line
Cyan - Gladys/McCallum Line
Yellow - Airport YXX Express
Squares - Major Convergences, NOT stations

Translucent Yellow Squares - Local line connectivity studies


My goal here was to create a high frequency bus network that reaches the outskirts of Abbotsford's suburbia. As a city that sprawls to have nearly the same jurisdiction of area as Winnipeg (comparing 375km2 to 461.78km2, according to Google), there is a lot of area to cover.

I also wanted to highlight the major nodes of convergence within this system because each of those nodes present an opportunity for local bus routes to terminate into if it makes sense to do so. Which brings me onto my next point...

The translucent yellow squares underneath the high frequency lines are study areas to propose local lines that feed into the high frequency network. And before I go on...

Now let me be clear, this is a high frequency bus system, NOT a BRT system with its own dedicated roads. Although if we really want to get into the fantasy of it all, I would like the interlined portion of the Red and Blue lines with their own bus lanes. But I digress ...

I realize that the problem with thinking that local routes would feed into a high frequency route is that it would increase the amount of transfers. But by initially lowering the total number of bus routes we have today in favour of increasing frequency and reliability, I would hope that this network would be able to increase ridership and ultimately change the local mentality towards buses.
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2592  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2022, 3:14 AM
scottN scottN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
Without closing off Souther Fraser Way, this is the redesign I came up with using 8/13 bus lines that Abbotsford currently has:



Red - Old Yale Line
Blue - South Fraser Line
Dark Green - Marshall Line
Pink - Maclure Line
Orange - Clearbrook Line
Light Green - Gladwin Line
Cyan - Gladys/McCallum Line
Yellow - Airport YXX Express
Squares - Major Convergences, NOT stations

Translucent Yellow Squares - Local line connectivity studies


My goal here was to create a high frequency bus network that reaches the outskirts of Abbotsford's suburbia. As a city that sprawls to have nearly the same jurisdiction of area as Winnipeg (comparing 375km2 to 461.78km2, according to Google), there is a lot of area to cover.

I also wanted to highlight the major nodes of convergence within this system because each of those nodes present an opportunity for local bus routes to terminate into if it makes sense to do so. Which brings me onto my next point...

The translucent yellow squares underneath the high frequency lines are study areas to propose local lines that feed into the high frequency network. And before I go on...

Now let me be clear, this is a high frequency bus system, NOT a BRT system with its own dedicated roads. Although if we really want to get into the fantasy of it all, I would like the interlined portion of the Red and Blue lines with their own bus lanes. But I digress ...

I realize that the problem with thinking that local routes would feed into a high frequency route is that it would increase the amount of transfers. But by initially lowering the total number of bus routes we have today in favour of increasing frequency and reliability, I would hope that this network would be able to increase ridership and ultimately change the local mentality towards buses.
Local routes can join up with bigger routes as they head into town or to an exchange. The vancouver bus routes do this along Hastings street (20, 16), Powell Street (7), west 4th avenue (7) and broadway (8, 16, 17). Surrey has a similar convergence on 72nd ave for all the routes going into the Newton exchange
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2593  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2022, 3:47 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,395
Not bad at all! Run those every 10-15 minutes all day, and it's bound to be at least ten times more useful than what Abby has now... maybe pass it up to somebody in BC Transit?

Though I figure sooner or later, somebody's got to put Cyan out of its misery...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2594  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2022, 1:07 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottN View Post
Local routes can join up with bigger routes as they head into town or to an exchange. The vancouver bus routes do this along Hastings street (20, 16), Powell Street (7), west 4th avenue (7) and broadway (8, 16, 17). Surrey has a similar convergence on 72nd ave for all the routes going into the Newton exchange
For sure . That's the whole idea behind doing local route studies is to see where that would make the most sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Not bad at all! Run those every 10-15 minutes all day, and it's bound to be at least ten times more useful than what Abby has now...
Yeah, that's definitely the idea: lowering the amount of routes that Abbotsford has now so that more buses can be concentrated to improve the frequency of service .

To be fair, at the end of this proposal, I may not be able to lower the amount of all routes depending on how many local routes are needed to supplement the frequent bus network. But it's a start.
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2595  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 7:38 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,571
For a Downtown Hastings line, I wonder if it would make more sense to go down Georgia through the new St Pauls Hospital campus. Start either from the West End somewhere, downtown, new Chinatown/Pacific Blvd station, St Pauls. Then cut up to Hastings from somewhere near Glen/Clark.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2596  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 8:00 PM
mcj mcj is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
For a Downtown Hastings line, I wonder if it would make more sense to go down Georgia through the new St Pauls Hospital campus. Start either from the West End somewhere, downtown, new Chinatown/Pacific Blvd station, St Pauls. Then cut up to Hastings from somewhere near Glen/Clark.
Where would the OMC go?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2597  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 8:32 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
Where would the OMC go?
I guess wherever they plan to stick the OMC for the North Shore/Burnaby line since I'm not sure if the Hastings is doable on its own. Only real option I think is connecting to another of the main lines or next to the Second Narrows bridge on the North Van side or maybe near the highway on Willingdon?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2598  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 8:49 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I guess wherever they plan to stick the OMC for the North Shore/Burnaby line since I'm not sure if the Hastings is doable on its own. Only real option I think is connecting to another of the main lines or next to the Second Narrows bridge on the North Van side or maybe near the highway on Willingdon?
The best choice decided by the design studio in my head would be either sharing space with the existing North Shore works yard east of the Second Narrows with a bit of land reclamation between the water mains, or convincing BCIT to allow space at the south end of their campus.

As for land near the highway, the Willingdon Lands at Canada Way and Willingdon look like an easy candidate, but they're bought and paid for by the Musqueam and Tsleil Waututh with Aquilini Developments. A station would probably be an easy slam dunk there. OMC? Not so much. Any land around Still Creek is too prone to flooding.

One other option I thought is potentially if Translink could acquire the Rona and light industrial buildings at Gladstone and Cotton in North Vancouver. It has the slight advantage of being in the City of North Van rather than the District (so a bit more likely for any approvals).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2599  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 9:46 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,395
Either keep it as an extension of the Expo from Waterfront (through International Village to Venables and back up to Hastings-Sunrise), or add a switch so that a decade or two later it can branch off at the St Paul's station and down Robson to Stanley Park. That lets them use the Edmonds depot and keep going as far as Lochdale instead of depending on North Shore-Willingdon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2600  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 10:43 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Either keep it as an extension of the Expo from Waterfront (through International Village to Venables and back up to Hastings-Sunrise), or add a switch so that a decade or two later it can branch off at the St Paul's station and down Robson to Stanley Park. That lets them use the Edmonds depot and keep going as far as Lochdale instead of depending on North Shore-Willingdon.
Strategic detour around the DTES I see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.