HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #941  
Old Posted May 29, 2020, 1:09 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,592
Rubenstein Forum: 05.28.2020





__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #942  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2020, 9:29 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is online now
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
The Rubenstein Forum from early today:



...then, if you turn your head to the left, the new Study hotel is basically almost all the way up!



I was totally shocked by how quickly this had gone up

__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #943  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 4:47 AM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Question:
Why don't (some) hotels have basements or underground foundations? I noticed that with the Sophy Hotel, too. They just built it right on top of the ground--like the Study--whereas the Rubinstein had a dug down foundation. I think that's why the Study went up so fast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #944  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 7:37 AM
Gedung Tinngi's Avatar
Gedung Tinngi Gedung Tinngi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Chicago - Jakarta
Posts: 4
The Rubinstein looks absolutely stunning!

How are the new dorms under construction one block to the south of the Rubenstein looking?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #945  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 1:58 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is online now
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gedung Tinngi View Post
The Rubinstein looks absolutely stunning!

How are the new dorms under construction one block to the south of the Rubenstein looking?
The dorms look good, appear to be fully constructed, perhaps still working on interiors(?). I forgot to take pictures as I was marveling at the Rubenstein. The tallest dorm building creates quite a presence on the south end of campus, as does the Rubenstein and the new hotel.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #946  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 2:02 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is online now
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestsideLA View Post
Question:
Why don't (some) hotels have basements or underground foundations? I noticed that with the Sophy Hotel, too. They just built it right on top of the ground--like the Study--whereas the Rubinstein had a dug down foundation. I think that's why the Study went up so fast.
It depends on the hotel/situation. Most hotels have surface or first floor back of house and loading docks for easy access delivery of goods, laundry services, etc. Although there are some hotels in Chicago that have lower levels/basements (such as the Radisson Blu in the Aqua, the Fairmont, the Renaissance) all of which benefit from being adjacent to lower Wacker which provides back of house ease of access, away from busy streets above where loading docks would be tricky to do.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #947  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 2:29 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 14,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestsideLA View Post
Question:
Why don't (some) hotels have basements or underground foundations? I noticed that with the Sophy Hotel, too. They just built it right on top of the ground--like the Study--whereas the Rubinstein had a dug down foundation. I think that's why the Study went up so fast.
You answered your own question, sort of... developers in Chicago avoid building basements on large buildings whenever possible. This is due to the cost of soil retention/dewatering and the extra months/years it adds to the construction schedule. Sometimes there's no choice, though (like One Chicago).
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #948  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 3:14 PM
dweeprise dweeprise is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
It depends on the hotel/situation. Most hotels have surface or first floor back of house and loading docks for easy access delivery of goods, laundry services, etc. Although there are some hotels in Chicago that have lower levels/basements (such as the Radisson Blu in the Aqua, the Fairmont, the Renaissance) all of which benefit from being adjacent to lower Wacker which provides back of house ease of access, away from busy streets above where loading docks would be tricky to do.
An example of a hotel in Chicago with a basement not extended to below street grade would be the Home2Suites at 110 W Huron.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #949  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 9:04 PM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
You answered your own question, sort of... developers in Chicago avoid building basements on large buildings whenever possible. This is due to the cost of soil retention/dewatering and the extra months/years it adds to the construction schedule. Sometimes there's no choice, though (like One Chicago).
So there's no real structural reason for an underground foundation in Chicago? I'm just asking because the Study Hotel and Rubenstein Forum are side by side, as you know. They spent months digging out the foundation for the Rubenstein, but the Study Hotel is just as tall, or so it appears, and yet they built it at ground level.

Maybe this changes for a tall skyscraper but I guess at lower level you can get away with a ground level foundation.

I ask this as a layman. I'm not in the contraction business and don't really know the engineering considerations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #950  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2020, 9:25 PM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
The dorms look good, appear to be fully constructed, perhaps still working on interiors(?). I forgot to take pictures as I was marveling at the Rubenstein. The tallest dorm building creates quite a presence on the south end of campus, as does the Rubenstein and the new hotel.
UChicago posted an interior tour of Woodlawn Commons:
https://v1.panoskin.com/?tour=5eb5c381d563b7343258248d
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #951  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2020, 3:28 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 14,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestsideLA View Post
So there's no real structural reason for an underground foundation in Chicago? I'm just asking because the Study Hotel and Rubenstein Forum are side by side, as you know. They spent months digging out the foundation for the Rubenstein, but the Study Hotel is just as tall, or so it appears, and yet they built it at ground level.

Maybe this changes for a tall skyscraper but I guess at lower level you can get away with a ground level foundation.

I ask this as a layman. I'm not in the contraction business and don't really know the engineering considerations.
The basement isn't a requirement of a deep foundation system. You build a basement because you need the extra space, especially for things that are necessary but unattractive (parking, storage, utility stuff). A deep foundation in Chicago is usually a caisson system, and you can drill caissons from ground level just as easily as from Level -1.

This is for large commercial projects, of course. For homes, especially small ones, the need to put (shallow) foundations below the frost line at 5 feet down means you're already basically doing all the work to dig out a basement space, so you can either backfill that space after the foundations are poured and waste the effort, or pour a basement floor while you have it dug out and put it to good use.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #952  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2020, 4:59 AM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
The basement isn't a requirement of a deep foundation system. You build a basement because you need the extra space, especially for things that are necessary but unattractive (parking, storage, utility stuff). A deep foundation in Chicago is usually a caisson system, and you can drill caissons from ground level just as easily as from Level -1.

This is for large commercial projects, of course. For homes, especially small ones, the need to put (shallow) foundations below the frost line at 5 feet down means you're already basically doing all the work to dig out a basement space, so you can either backfill that space after the foundations are poured and waste the effort, or pour a basement floor while you have it dug out and put it to good use.
Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #953  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2020, 5:48 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: South Loop, Chicago
Posts: 2,437
From today:







__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead. Trump delenda est.

Last edited by SIGSEGV; Jul 5, 2020 at 5:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #954  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2020, 11:30 PM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Thanks for pics.

That last pic is a great shot of Woodlawn Commons, but two other buildings got in the way. LOL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #955  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2020, 11:44 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: South Loop, Chicago
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestsideLA View Post
Thanks for pics.

That last pic is a great shot of Woodlawn Commons, but two other buildings got in the way. LOL
hah, sorry! looked through the rest of my pictures from yesterday and that's the best angle I got of Woodlawn Commons .
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead. Trump delenda est.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #956  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2020, 1:09 AM
southoftheloop southoftheloop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 16
Rubenstein looking sharp!! Pretty great collection of buildings lining both sides of the Midway now
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #957  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 8:55 PM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Pritzker announced new facilities would be built at the University of Illinois and "right here at the University of Chicago" at the Dept. of Energy event today.

https://www.facebook.com/uchicago/vi...8078529348931/

(29:50)

Could this be referring to a new building for the Molecular Engineering School or compsci or something else?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #958  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2020, 1:37 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is online now
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestsideLA View Post
Pritzker announced new facilities would be built at the University of Illinois and "right here at the University of Chicago" at the Dept. of Energy event today.

https://www.facebook.com/uchicago/vi...8078529348931/

(29:50)

Could this be referring to a new building for the Molecular Engineering School or compsci or something else?
Potentially - I had brought this up a few months ago; UC is planning a new construction building for the the school of Molecular Engineering, we responded to a very early RFQ, and I believe the building was planned to be around 200-300K gsf (which is quite large), but that was last year, and I suspect the current pandemic has put those plans on hold for a year or so. For now, I believe the dept is spread out in other locations on campus.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #959  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2020, 5:46 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: South Loop, Chicago
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Potentially - I had brought this up a few months ago; UC is planning a new construction building for the the school of Molecular Engineering, we responded to a very early RFQ, and I believe the building was planned to be around 200-300K gsf (which is quite large), but that was last year, and I suspect the current pandemic has put those plans on hold for a year or so. For now, I believe the dept is spread out in other locations on campus.
I think they're using office space in the old HEP building (not that they need it now with only essential and lab personnel allowed to return, for now). But yeah, I can't remember if they're taking the space in the old HEP building, or demolishing accelerator, or building a new building or what. I just know that high-bay space is going to be hard to come by soon...
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead. Trump delenda est.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #960  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2020, 9:23 PM
WestsideLA WestsideLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Potentially - I had brought this up a few months ago; UC is planning a new construction building for the the school of Molecular Engineering, we responded to a very early RFQ, and I believe the building was planned to be around 200-300K gsf (which is quite large), but that was last year, and I suspect the current pandemic has put those plans on hold for a year or so. For now, I believe the dept is spread out in other locations on campus.
I don't doubt that UChicago has taken a hit due to the pandemic. The announcement seemed to be of a $220 million loss so far. However, after yesterday's DOE announcement, it appears likely UChicago will be a participant in one of the DOE National Quantum Centers to be announced by the end of the month. That initiatives has $1.25 billion in Congressional funding so far.

https://www.hpherald.com/news/at-u-o...4e9be8533.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:47 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.