HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


View Poll Results: Who should be the next mayor of Ottawa?
Mark Sutcliffe 8 15.38%
Catherine McKenney 43 82.69%
Bob Chiarelli 1 1.92%
Other 0 0%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 2:47 PM
RuralCitizen RuralCitizen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Ottawa Area
Posts: 190
There was an interview on the radio this morning (on FM104.7).
Fleury said he was definitely interested, but hasn't made is decision yet. He needs to discuss with family before hand, and might announce his decision in the new year.

He felt now isn't the time to announce anything since Jim Watson's news is so fresh. Out of respect, other candidates should wait a little bit.

(my paraphrasing)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 2:52 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,253
added Fleury - if anyone wants to change their vote PM me....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 3:22 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 762
@waterloowarrior. Thanks for creating the poll.

I did choose Diane Deans for reasons mentioned earlier but I'm ok with Catherine McKenney too. My first choice if they would have run would be Jeff Leiper though. I think he's among the best of the current council members.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 3:25 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by daud View Post
@waterloowarrior. Thanks for creating the poll.

I did choose Diane Deans for reasons mentioned earlier but I'm ok with Catherine McKenney too. My first choice if they would have run would be Jeff Leiper though. I think he's among the best of the current council members.

Agreed, I wish Jeff Leiper would run, as he'd be my choice too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 4:42 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 643
I'm all in for McKenney. One of the rare breeds (in this town) of progressive, forward-thinking, consistent, urban councillors who doesn't carry water for NIMBYers at every turn.

I was really disappointed with Diane Deans' campaign announcement. It was so full of meaningless platitudes ("I want to unite this city", "we need to come together") that I could barely make it to the end. I have no time for that nonsense. It suggests what the rest of her campaign is going to look like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 5:33 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
added Fleury - if anyone wants to change their vote PM me....
what about the single issue wingnut candidate. I.e save the manor park side yard setbacks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 5:46 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,687
We need that data on how much developer funding councillors get.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 6:25 PM
SkeggsEggs SkeggsEggs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 403
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 7:38 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkeggsEggs View Post
Thank you.

McKenney - $0

My kinda politician.

Unfortunately, Tierney is my councillor. $26k.

Also, Dianne Dean's, the compromise candidate with $15k/53% of her donations from developers? LOL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 11:01 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by RuralCitizen View Post
There was an interview on the radio this morning (on FM104.7).
Fleury said he was definitely interested, but hasn't made is decision yet. He needs to discuss with family before hand, and might announce his decision in the new year.

He felt now isn't the time to announce anything since Jim Watson's news is so fresh. Out of respect, other candidates should wait a little bit.

(my paraphrasing)
Respect for letting Watson's announcement sink-in and taking the time to consider if he'll run or not. I thought the other three jumped the gun a bit too quickly. What's the rush?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2021, 6:15 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Respect for letting Watson's announcement sink-in and taking the time to consider if he'll run or not. I thought the other three jumped the gun a bit too quickly. What's the rush?
Regardless of rushed or not, quick or not, respectful or not, that isn't the reason he hasn't made an announcement. Just not how politics works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2021, 6:21 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Respect for letting Watson's announcement sink-in and taking the time to consider if he'll run or not. I thought the other three jumped the gun a bit too quickly. What's the rush?
Likely they want to declare early to discourage other entrants... nominations don't actually open until May 2 and close August 19th, so plenty of time to withdraw or run in their ward instead if they don't feel they have the support.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2021, 11:13 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 855
>Catherine McKenney (who like Deans has recently announced they're running for mayor) sees it as a "gift to TNEXT", ie. SNC-Lavalin.
Many councillors concerned about contamination cleanup costs.
Report goes to full council in the new year.

https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/status/1471895267096018946?s=20

Yeah, lets try not to elect someone be it deans or McKenney, that thinks that is an accurate statement... That the city buying land they already lease & use is equal to a gift to the maintainer of the infrastructure that will be onsite.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...ne-depot-lands-in-6-4m-deal-with-cp-rail
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2021, 4:55 AM
SkeggsEggs SkeggsEggs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williamoforange View Post
>Catherine McKenney (who like Deans has recently announced they're running for mayor) sees it as a "gift to TNEXT", ie. SNC-Lavalin.
Many councillors concerned about contamination cleanup costs.
Report goes to full council in the new year.

https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/status/1471895267096018946?s=20

Yeah, lets try not to elect someone be it deans or McKenney, that thinks that is an accurate statement... That the city buying land they already lease & use is equal to a gift to the maintainer of the infrastructure that will be onsite.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...ne-depot-lands-in-6-4m-deal-with-cp-rail
From the article: "In a report to the committee, staff recommend buying 14.46 acres of CP Rail land, much of which the city currently leases at Walkley Yard. The city has leased 8.5 acres of land since 2001 and is using adjacent city-owned land, along with a small portion of acquired land, for the Stage 2 Trillium Line facility."

14.46 - 8.5 = 5.96 acres of CP Rail Land that the city is buying but not currently leasing.

If the "small portion of acquired land" is not on land currently being leased, I don't think the question is as outrageous or incompetent as you are attempting to portray it. Ultimately yes its unimportant in the grand scheme of things but they are just playing typical politics.


Idk about the full extent of McKenney's comments, but Deans' was a question, not a statement. Tweet before the one you linked:
Quote:
"Is this a Christmas gift for SNC-Lavalin, or are they going to be paying us back?" asked Coun. Diane Deans of land purchase beside Walkley facility for Trillium Line.
#OttCity's Michael Morgan: Not a Christmas gift. Part of long-term lease expiring Dec 31, city has bldgs on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2021, 1:22 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williamoforange View Post
>Catherine McKenney (who like Deans has recently announced they're running for mayor) sees it as a "gift to TNEXT", ie. SNC-Lavalin.
Many councillors concerned about contamination cleanup costs.
Report goes to full council in the new year.

https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/status/1471895267096018946?s=20

Yeah, lets try not to elect someone be it deans or McKenney, that thinks that is an accurate statement... That the city buying land they already lease & use is equal to a gift to the maintainer of the infrastructure that will be onsite.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...ne-depot-lands-in-6-4m-deal-with-cp-rail
I agree with you there. This is about future proofing the Trillium Line, not gifting SNC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2021, 3:53 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williamoforange View Post
>Catherine McKenney (who like Deans has recently announced they're running for mayor) sees it as a "gift to TNEXT", ie. SNC-Lavalin.
Many councillors concerned about contamination cleanup costs.
Report goes to full council in the new year.

https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/status/1471895267096018946?s=20

Yeah, lets try not to elect someone be it deans or McKenney, that thinks that is an accurate statement... That the city buying land they already lease & use is equal to a gift to the maintainer of the infrastructure that will be onsite.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...ne-depot-lands-in-6-4m-deal-with-cp-rail
It is way too early for me to favour any particular candidate but Diane Dean's has asked many pointed questions over the years . This question or comment clarified an issue that few were paying attention to. This helps the public to know what is going on, in this case, in her own ward. I do not believe that this should be criticized. Public spending is our business.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2021, 6:59 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 855
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
It is way too early for me to favour any particular candidate but Diane Dean's has asked many pointed questions over the years . This question or comment clarified an issue that few were paying attention to. This helps the public to know what is going on, in this case, in her own ward. I do not believe that this should be criticized. Public spending is our business.
>Is this a Christmas gift for SNC-Lavalin, or are they going to be paying us back?

That was deans question among many more, and it was a loaded question (not pointed) that pre-assumed an answer. It is known that the city has "Ottawa's Official Plan Rights-of-Way Protection Policy" regarding buying rail land when it comes available, knowing this deans assumes it was a gift to tnext and would be just given to them.

While McKenney asked question of the same nature along with making direct comments that this purchase was a gift to transit-next/SNC (after Morgan made statements against such a comment, McKenney does that often). Then came out against the purchase as it stands (time 28:00)

As for contamination it looks like the city may have been required to remediate the lease site before handing it back (time 36:30).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2021, 3:23 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,687
Guess that leaves Fleury as the sensible urbanist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2021, 7:48 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 643
Fleury is certainly way better than Watson, that much is clear. But personally my definition of "sensible urbanism" doesn't include voting to give huge government subsidies to porche dealerships after the wealthy family that owns it donates to your campaign.

I also have a hard time recognizing Fleury as an urbanist under any sensible definition of the term considering his votes on the Civic Hospital plans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2021, 8:29 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,687
Good points. Ugggh. So hard to have a clean candidate who also isn't pushing conspiracies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.