HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 12:24 PM
SL123 SL123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,915
Looks identical to the previous concept! I'm just glad this project is still being considered after Trinity sold it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 2:05 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
Looks identical to the previous concept! I'm just glad this project is still being considered after Trinity sold it.
I do not love the auto-oriented drop-off loop, but otherwise looks promising. Why can't they put that behind the building?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 3:54 PM
Har13 Har13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
I do not love the auto-oriented drop-off loop, but otherwise looks promising. Why can't they put that behind the building?
100% agreed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 4:01 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
I do not love the auto-oriented drop-off loop, but otherwise looks promising. Why can't they put that behind the building?
Gets cars and couriers off the street for stopping or taking up valuable bike lane space for drop off and pick-up...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 5:31 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
I do not love the auto-oriented drop-off loop, but otherwise looks promising. Why can't they put that behind the building?
That loop faces the back end of Canadian Bank Note Limited, so I don't see it ever becoming a pleasant place to walk or bike anyway. Pushing it further back as the lot gets narrower could be challenging. That location also provides access to all three towers.

As long as the Gladstone front and the first 100 meters of Loretta presents an active face, I'm happy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshsparrow View Post
Gets cars and couriers off the street for stopping or taking up valuable bike lane space for drop off and pick-up...
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 5:39 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
That loop faces the back end of Canadian Bank Note Limited, so I don't see it ever becoming a pleasant place to walk or bike anyway. Pushing it further back as the lot gets narrower could be challenging. That location also provides access to all three towers.

As long as the Gladstone front and the first 100 meters of Loretta presents an active face, I'm happy.
I really doubt that CBN will be there forever, so I think that the design matters there. I wasn't thinking further back in the lot. I was thinking a reorientation so the building is closer to the street, with an entrance for cars that goes through the building and leads to a loop along the tracks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 5:51 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
I really doubt that CBN will be there forever, so I think that the design matters there. I wasn't thinking further back in the lot. I was thinking a reorientation so the building is closer to the street, with an entrance for cars that goes through the building and leads to a loop along the tracks.
I expect CBN will be there for a while. They've been heavily concerned about noise levels from their facility possibly impacting Gladstone Village across the tracks (i.e. don't want to spend money on reducing noise levels for Gladstone Village). Not sure if they had commented on this proposal as well.

In any case, if they expressed concern over a 30 year development across the tracks, it indicates to me they plan on being around for a while.

That said, placing the loop on the track side is an interesting idea. I suspect though that they believe more people will access their building on bike or on foot from the future Trillium MUP on the west side of the tracks than from Loretta, so they may want to display their best face towards the tracks and Gladstone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 6:28 PM
Spoonsy's Avatar
Spoonsy Spoonsy is offline
You call that a knife?
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Centretown West
Posts: 323
Someone has strong feelings about this proposal



https://goo.gl/maps/zfU6iyNDBYa4L3Us6
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 6:44 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
I expect CBN will be there for a while. They've been heavily concerned about noise levels from their facility possibly impacting Gladstone Village across the tracks (i.e. don't want to spend money on reducing noise levels for Gladstone Village). Not sure if they had commented on this proposal as well.

In any case, if they expressed concern over a 30 year development across the tracks, it indicates to me they plan on being around for a while.

That said, placing the loop on the track side is an interesting idea. I suspect though that they believe more people will access their building on bike or on foot from the future Trillium MUP on the west side of the tracks than from Loretta, so they may want to display their best face towards the tracks and Gladstone.
You're probably right about the MUP, and Gladstone should definitely have the best side of the project. Though it seems to me that you can have both a good entrance from the MUP and the loop, as the cars wouldn't have to cross the MUP, nor would bikes have to cross the loop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 15, 2021, 4:44 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 855
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
I really doubt that CBN will be there forever, so I think that the design matters there. I wasn't thinking further back in the lot. I was thinking a reorientation so the building is closer to the street, with an entrance for cars that goes through the building and leads to a loop along the tracks.
Let's hope they can continue to be there, it would be a shame if the inner city lost what little well paying low education middle class jobs it has left. (Aka manufacturing jobs)

As for is location, a loop on the other side of planters and landscaping is hardly high impact. As for the location of the buildings in relation, probably trying to avoid having a wall that goes the entire block.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2021, 7:46 AM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 877
Here's some additional renderings of what this will look like:







I still like this project and hope it starts soon. It still has decent proximity to 900 Albert, so hopefully it'll create an extension of a larger skyline when both areas develop further. You may need to zoom out to see the pics, sorry in advance lol.

Last edited by rocketphish; Jun 21, 2021 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Resized the humongous images
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2021, 12:57 PM
GeoNerd GeoNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON.
Posts: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by originalmuffins View Post


I think their scaling is off a bit. That is the biggest bus I've ever seen. Nice looking renders though. I hope this project gets built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 20, 2021, 1:55 PM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
Looks identical to the previous concept! I'm just glad this project is still being considered after Trinity sold it.
I'm also glad it's being considered. Now that it isn't Trinity doing it, it would be nice to see this approved and breaking ground while 900 Albert is going up!

Really hope it has great street interaction beside the station so it can create some action in the immediate area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.