Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel
The newer terminology is still slightly nebulous to me, but would these type of structures be defined as "missing middle" housing, or is that primarily defined as single-family, 2 or 3-flats?
|
"Missing middle housing" doesn't have an official OED definition, but it's most commonly used to refer to any housing that's between a detached SFH and a full-on apartment building.
The line between small-scale MFH (like flats) and a full-on apartment buildings can be nebulous, but in the case of Chicago, I think an upper limit of 9 units makes sense, because that's the point at which a lot of our local rules change regarding MFH.
Pretty much all of these infill mid-rises starting to line the arterials all over town are 10+ units, so i would exclude them from "missing middle", which is a term much more aligned with our city's legions of flat buildings.
But it doesn't much matter what we call any of it; I say bring it on! Bring it all on!!!
High-rises, mid-rises, 3-flats, whatever..... let's build more MFH!