HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #941  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2026, 9:58 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,810
The mess that is OC Transpo and the LRT has nothing to do with increased developments or density within the city limits. It is a whole separate beast that, regardless of origin, needs to be fixed.

Perhaps this will help amplify and speed up the fixes that are required to get transit where it needs to be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #942  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2026, 10:22 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,429
This is what I'd like to see more details about:

Quote:
Councillors made a long list of minor tweaks on Wednesday, making slight zoning adjustments or increasing permitted tower heights for a handful of specific properties, for example.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-zoning-community-housing-building-rules-2026-9.7065144
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #943  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2026, 12:36 AM
SkeggsEggs SkeggsEggs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Only one I noticed was 100 metre height for some properties near marketplace station in barhaven
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #944  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2026, 2:08 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 855
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
Look at the transit mess that has been getting worse and worse for 10 years.

We want more random density and dump parking onto the streets, which will happen, guaranteed.

Zoning planning goes. hand and hand with transport planning and this is not happening.

Not everybody wants apartment living and then you suggest single access apartments. We had that in the old days but. there were fire escapes back in those days.

Be careful what you hope for
The current Transit mess your referring to is separate from density...Secondly increased density increase the viability of higher frequency/capacity transit

Transit & zoning planning did go hand in hand hence the hubs...if your again referring to the 3 story min...see my original comment

Then don't live in one, but lets be clear here you being an old codger with a dislike of apartments because you see the people who live in them as beneath you, ain't a reason for them to be built.

I directly referred to euro style single stair buildings, which have a vast amount of other safety features to match & by some studies EXCEED the safety of the current building code
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #945  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2026, 2:50 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,429
Proposed deal between city and NCC aims to speed up housing
Agreement would streamline process for developments on NCC-owned lands

Cameron Mahler · CBC News
Posted: Feb 10, 2026 4:00 AM EST | Last Updated: 5 hours ago


A motion backed by Ottawa Mayor Mark Sutcliffe aims to speed up the construction of housing on land owned by the National Capital Commission (NCC).

The motion, introduced by Coun. Glen Gower on Sutcliffe's behalf, would streamline the approvals process and get residential units built "faster and more affordably … with a focus on affordable housing on NCC lands," according to a statement from Sutcliffe's office.

The city's statutory obligations including environmental considerations and public consultation would be preserved, but timelines would be shortened to move the building process from the proposal stage to construction with fewer potential snags along the way.

Ottawa city council will consider the motion Wednesday.

In an emailed statement, NCC communications manager Valérie Dufour said the federal Crown corporation sees it as a way to "advance and accelerate housing projects, including affordable housing, on federal land."

The NCC sees it as a "positive step toward strengthening collaboration" with the city, Dufour said.

<more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/pr...o-speed-up-housing-development-9.7081638
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #946  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2026, 6:29 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 855
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/ottawa-ontario-fastest-growing-new-homes

Another reason why the city new official plan doesn't hold water, council just agreed that Ottawa expected growth rate is 25% higher then what the official plan originally predicted.

So another reason why it's bad form to oppose high density near mass transit, especially if you think the city should not sprawl......

Hopefully this along with OPA 46 is enough backing to send the official plan running to the dumpster
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #947  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2026, 12:52 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,253
OPA 46 approved with modifications... significant density increases for several stations including Iris, Carleton, and many BRT stations
https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/025-0940
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #948  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 12:59 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,429
How much should Ottawa sprawl as it seeks space for 500,000 more people?
Debate delayed over 'uncertainty' from the province

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Apr 29, 2026 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 5 hours ago


As Ottawa looks to make room for 500,000 more residents, city council will have to reopen a contentious debate about urban sprawl.

But that debate won’t come until next year at the earliest, after a slew of proposed provincial changes delayed a discussion on how far to go.

One term ago, in 2020, council voted to open up 1,281 hectares of greenfield land by expanding the urban boundary that limits suburban growth. Those lands still aren't used up and could potentially accommodate tens of thousands of homes.

But it likely won't be enough. That move was based on a population forecast the province is now calling outdated, potentially forcing council to find even more lands for even more homes.

As of 2024, provincial figures report 1.15 million people living in Ottawa. At the time of that 2020 vote, the city was predicting 1.4 million residents by 2046.

The province now wants Ottawa to use higher estimates. Earlier this month, Municipal Affairs Minister Rob Flack sent a letter urging the city to use provincial projections that foresee 1.68 million Ottawa residents by 205, calling the gap “significant” and “the largest we have seen in the province.”

“That's a big number,” Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said last week. “We're going to need housing for all of those people. We're going to need infrastructure. We're going to need a strong sustainable growth plan for the City of Ottawa. We don't know what that looks like yet.”

Yet councillors were preparing to decide what it will look like. Even before the minister's letter, they voted in February to update the growth projections to comply with the province’s numbers.

Staff were preparing to present councillors with options at a meeting this week about how to accommodate all those new people. The options included five scenarios that could result in radically different futures for Ottawa.

One would hold the line on sprawl, channeling those half million people into existing neighbourhoods.

Another extreme would rely much more heavily on single detached homes and row housing and require a potentially wide expansion of Ottawa’s suburbs into rural areas.

The other three proposals would land somewhere in between.

<more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-urban-sprawl-population-zoning-planning-9.7178912
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #949  
Old Posted May 15, 2026, 1:03 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,429
City hall is pushing new home construction out of Ottawa
If expanding Ottawa’s suburbs is sprawl, what would sprawl opponents call the expansion beyond the city’s borders?

By Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen
Published May 14, 2026 | Last updated 1 day ago


City of Ottawa planners and councillors focus a lot of attention on the perceived merits of intensification and building apartments near light rail, but they’re missing a big part of the picture. Ottawa is doing a poor job of producing “ground-oriented housing,” the singles, semis and townhouses that families want.

In Ontario, 76 per cent of families with children live in those types of housing.

The city is already losing a substantial number of families to neighbouring communities. If it can’t fix the family housing problem, it will lose even more, driving young families out of their own city and failing to attract new ones.

The Greater Ottawa Homebuilders Association is calling attention to the problem, pointing to research from the Missing Middle Initiative, a think tank based at the University of Ottawa.

While the Ottawa region continues to attract Ontarians from elsewhere in the province, “a growing share are choosing communities outside Ottawa’s municipal boundaries in search of more suitable and affordable housing,” says Mike Moffatt, founding director of the institute.

In a separate report comparing growth in Ottawa to that in Lanark County, Moffatt points out that 20 years ago, Ottawa became home to 80 per cent of people moving to our area from elsewhere in Ontario. Over the last four years, Ottawa got only 27 per cent of that group, just slightly better than Lanark or Prescott and Russell.

The lack of family housing in the city is the root cause of the problem. Over the last two years, the city has averaged 3,000 ground-oriented units per year. Moffatt estimates that to meet the demand for that kind of housing between 2021 and 2051, it would take 7,600 units a year. Ottawa has never achieved that pace.

The gap between ground-oriented demand and new supply of those types of homes will leave Ottawa short nearly 104,000 units by 2051, Moffatt predicts.

To anyone familiar with the growing communities near Ottawa, the family housing growth there is neither a surprise nor a mystery. Expansion is rapid in Kemptville, Russell, Carleton Place and Mississippi Mills.

These communities are attracting families and developers because they have lower land costs, lower development charges and quicker approvals. Moffatt says prices in outlying communities can be $200,000 less than the same house in Ottawa.

Meanwhile, Ottawa’s planners and politicians continue to act as if Ottawa is an island and there is no escape. On this island, they determine what type of housing will be built and where it will be located. It’s a command-and-control approach, the opposite of responding to market preferences.

Even though new suburbs are dense and their location controlled by the city, it’s still popular to decry them as “sprawl.” If expanding Ottawa’s suburbs is sprawl, what would sprawl opponents call the ever-increasing expansion beyond the city’s borders?

What we are seeing is the Greenbelt, part two. That failed effort to control urban expansion sterilized a vast ring of land around the old core of the city, only to push development farther out. Now, councillors are looking at another fight over the urban boundary, as if that imaginary line will stop development.

With their focus on intensification and apartments, City Hall thinkers are helping push new home construction right out of Ottawa. In the process, they are lengthening the commute for people who must move to neighbouring towns to get what they want at an affordable price.

As a major city, Ottawa has costs to cover that small towns do not. That said, Ottawa acts like it has no competition for newcomers.

Limiting suburban development land creates an artificial scarcity and drives up prices. Development charges go up continually like it’s free money, a tax on people who aren’t here yet. Turns out, more of those people are saying no thanks.

The city’s over-reliance on intensification and disdain for the kinds of houses families want doesn’t solve a problem. It just pushes it farther down the road.

Randall Denley is an Ottawa journalist and author. Contact him at [email protected]

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/city-hall-new-home-construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #950  
Old Posted May 20, 2026, 12:58 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,429
Staff recommend rejecting urban boundary expansion for development near Stittsville
Caivan was seeking permission to include the area in the urban boundary and designate the land as 'neighbourhood'

By Aedan Helmer, Ottawa Citizen
Published May 20, 2026 | Last updated 4 hours ago




City of Ottawa planning staff are recommending councillors reject an application to expand the urban boundary as part of a proposal to build 360 homes south of Stittsville.

The developer, Caivan, had submitted the application to expand the existing urban boundary directly adjacent to 16 hectares of land on the west side of Shea Road and the north side of Flewellyn Road, which are largely vacant.

Caivan was seeking permission to include the area in the urban boundary and designate the land as “neighbourhood”. The land is currently designated as “rural countryside” under the city’s official plan.

There is already land to the north and west of the area that has been designated for future development as Caivan’s “Magnolia” subdivision.

City staff evaluated the proposal and concluded that available land within the urban boundary already exceeds the minimum provincial requirements for a 15-year supply of designated and available residential land.

A 2024 provincial planning statement requires municipalities to maintain the ability to accommodate residential growth for a minimum of 15 years with lands that are designated or available for residential development.

The city currently has 1,581 hectares of available or designated land, which exceeds the minimum requirement by 314 hectares or 3.7 years, according to a report that was set for the planning and housing committee May 20.

An additional 339 hectares — or 6.2 years’ supply — of residential land will be added to the city’s available land supply, which extends the city’s land supply to nearly 25 years.

Caivan “has not demonstrated a land need to substantiate the request for an expansion to the City’s urban boundary,” staff wrote.

The developer “has not provided a land need assessment to contradict or provide a rationale that there is an existing land need beyond staff’s data and analysis,” the report states.

The application “does not demonstrate a need for additional urban land” based on growth projections and the city’s current supply of land.

Rideau-Jock Coun. David Hill supports the staff recommendation to reject the proposal and Coun. Glen Gower, whose Stittsville ward is adjacent to the proposed development, has also said he does not support the urban boundary expansion.

The application is now headed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, according to the staff report, with a case management conference scheduled for May 22.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/urban-boundary-expansion-stittsville
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:28 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.