HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 31, 2017, 7:17 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Bilingual Ottawa

This whole issue confuses me. I thought Ottawa was already bilingual as Mayor Watson says. Aren't there counter arguments asking to end Ottawa bilingualism? What concretely are these students demanding and what are the pros and cons?


Franco-Ontarian students demand Ottawa be officially bilingual
Students argue Canada 150 celebrations offer perfect opportunity

Close to 1,000 Franco-Ontarian students marched through downtown Ottawa Wednesday morning, demanding Ottawa city council declare the city officially bilingual.

Analysis: Why the debate on making Ottawa officially bilingual won't go away
The sea of green and white marchers, representing the colours of the Franco-Ontarian flag, chanted calls for a bilingual Ottawa, as they made their way from Strathcona Park in Sandy Hill, to rally and speeches outside Ottawa City Hall.

While the request from Ottawa's Francophone community is not new, the students said the upcoming July 1st celebration for Canada's 150th anniversary presents the ideal time to make the declaration.

"This is simply taking a policy that's working quite well for many, and making it official," said Grade 11 student and president of the Fédération de la jeunesse franco-ontarienne Pablo Mhanna-Sandoval, referring to the city's bilingualism policy adopted in 2001.

"If a mayor and council were to be elected in the future, and they were less friendly to francophones, it would be very easy for them to repeal these policies," said Mhanna-Sandoval.

Pablo
Grade 11 student Pablo Mhanna-Sandoval, president of the Fédération de la jeunesse franco-ontarienne, says he doesn't believe fears of rising costs and lost jobs if Ottawa is made officially bilingual are true. (Giacomo Panico/CBC)

Fears unfounded, say marchers

Mhanna-Sandoval admits critics of making Ottawa officially bilingual have so far been successful in delivering their message, when they argue the city could face additional costs for language training, or when they argue that many city jobs would become unavailable to unilingual English candidates.

"The scare mongering on the other side has had an effect," said Mhanna-Sandoval. He said he believes fears of fees, economic loss and job losses are unfounded.

To grade 10 student Éliane Fiset, a bilingual declaration would also boost Ottawa's profile both nationally and internationally.

"The country doesn't see Ottawa as bilingual. It sees Ottawa as an anglophone city that has francophone services. It's not the same to me as being officially bilingual," said Fiset.

student franco protest
Franco-Ontarian students march along Laurier Avenue on their way from Strathcona Park to Ottawa city hall. (Giacomo Panico/CBC)

The sight of a thousand Franco-Ontarian youth rallying for their rights in front of city hall was especially significant for some of the adult activists in the crowd.

"I think it's fabulous that they're involved, because it's their future, it's their city, and they want services in French," said Suzanne Copping. the general manager of the Fondation Franco-Ontarienne.

'It's going to happen'

Copping said despite the repeated rejections for official bilingualism, she remains optimistic.

"It's going to happen, for sure. I come from a family that fought for French schools, and we've got them," said Copping.

Not in attendance to hear first hand from the crowd was Ottawa mayor Jim Watson, who was en route to Montreal for meetings with Montreal's mayor Denis Coderre.

An email from Watson's staff Wednesday said the mayor holds the position that the City of Ottawa is in fact bilingual, as stated in the city's bylaws, and that the city's services and programs are all offered to residents in both English and French.

The student's efforts continue Wednesday evening with a rally including musical performances and sketches scheduled at De La Salle High school in Lowertown.​
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 31, 2017, 9:04 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
The City of Ottawa is obligated by provincial law to provide bilingual services. I believe this push is about rewording that to state in provincial law that Ottawa is a bilingual city.

The whole thing is kind of pointless, IMO. It makes zero practical difference on.. anything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 1:51 AM
Admiral Nelson Admiral Nelson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
The whole thing is kind of pointless, IMO. It makes zero practical difference on.. anything.
Maybe when it comes to employment in City jobs it will?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 2:20 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,721
I heard tonight on the radio that there is a concern about court actions. As soon as official bilingualism is declared, it is then subject to interpretation by the courts and therefore is no longer controlled by the politicians even if City Council is acting entirely in good faith. The result can be unintended consequences. It is mentioned in the article that job loss is unfounded but we see the implementation of official bilingualism at the federal level. How can people's fears be considered unfounded based on that example?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 2:29 AM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
I heard tonight on the radio that there is a concern about court actions. As soon as official bilingualism is declared, it is then subject to interpretation by the courts and therefore is no longer controlled by the politicians even if City Council is acting entirely in good faith. The result can be unintended consequences. It is mentioned in the article that job loss is unfounded but we see the implementation of official bilingualism at the federal level. How can people's fears be considered unfounded based on that example?
That's why it can (and should) only happen in conjunction with a legal definition of what "official bilingualism" means in an Ottawa context. It seems to be a missing element of the discussion so far, apart from general assertions that it would simply give legal recognition to the status quo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 3:18 AM
Admiral Nelson Admiral Nelson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
It is mentioned in the article that job loss is unfounded but we see the implementation of official bilingualism at the federal level. How can people's fears be considered unfounded based on that example?
Right. I haven't read anything that would put those fears to bed. Except, that is, for the word, quoted in the article, of the president of the Fédération de la jeunesse franco-ontarienne
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 10:54 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
People have lost jobs they already held on permanent basis in the federal government because they weren't bilingual? Really?
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 12:49 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
People have lost jobs they already held on permanent basis in the federal government because they weren't bilingual? Really?
It was a criteria that was sometimes used in DRAP job cuts, but only for those that no longer met the linguistic profile of their position so essentially they were no longer meeting the job requirements. The specific example I know of something like 50 people were competing for a few jobs so the person didn't bother spending a bunch of money or time studying to renew their levels as it was a longshot anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 2:39 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
People have lost jobs they already held on permanent basis in the federal government because they weren't bilingual? Really?
You do not know the reality of the 1970s. I knew two people in my own family who 'left' their public service careers at that time because they were not bilingual.

Regardless, this is not necessarily about job loss but loss of future job opportunities.

I listened again to the radio this morning and it was quite clear that this is about steering the city to a much more bilingual future. A specific example was given. If a course is offered in English, it must be offered in French. This means the instructor (who may be hired to offer that specific course) must be bilingual or they must hire a bilingual instructor or the course simply is not offered. The latter may well be the case. Also, if your local arena employee cannot speak French, there may be objections. In the end, more jobs will require bilingualism and this will grow over time.

There is an impression that this really symbolic but when you start asking questions to those who are pushing it, there is more to it. It becomes an easier route towards demanding more french language services than by asking for them under the current laws.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 2:51 PM
Bandage Bandage is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 37
I'm planning on forming a "Anglo Quebec" social justice brigade. Who wants in? We will march in the streets of Quebec and fly our massively oversized anglo quebec flags all over the place. Right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 2:59 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandage View Post
I'm planning on forming a "Anglo Quebec" social justice brigade. Who wants in? We will march in the streets of Quebec and fly our massively oversized anglo quebec flags all over the place. Right?
Yeah, that will go over really well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 5:43 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandage View Post
I'm planning on forming a "Anglo Quebec" social justice brigade. Who wants in? We will march in the streets of Quebec and fly our massively oversized anglo quebec flags all over the place. Right?

Knock yourself out, I guess, but what is the relevance to the subject of this thread?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 3:31 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post

Regardless, this is not necessarily about job loss but loss of future job opportunities.

I listened again to the radio this morning and it was quite clear that this is about steering the city to a much more bilingual future. A specific example was given. If a course is offered in English, it must be offered in French. This means the instructor (who may be hired to offer that specific course) must be bilingual or they must hire a bilingual instructor or the course simply is not offered. The latter may well be the case. Also, if your local arena employee cannot speak French, there may be objections. In the end, more jobs will require bilingualism and this will grow over time.

There is an impression that this really symbolic but when you start asking questions to those who are pushing it, there is more to it. It becomes an easier route towards demanding more french language services than by asking for them under the current laws.
I am intentionally trying very hard to stay out of the debate because I don't live in Ottawa, however there is an obvious logic flaw that permeates the arguments of the opponents. That is that not speaking language X is somehow an unchangeable status. I fail to grasp how in 2017 the school system in Ottawa (regardless of the board) is still unable to churn out a strong majority of graduates who have at least a passable fluency in both of Canada's fficial languages. (If only to meet the requirements of the city's main employer, the federal government. Which employs far more Ottawans than the City of Ottawa ever will.)
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 6:12 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I fail to grasp how in 2017 the school system in Ottawa (regardless of the board) is still unable to churn out a strong majority of graduates who have at least a passable fluency in both of Canada's fficial languages. (If only to meet the requirements of the city's main employer, the federal government. Which employs far more Ottawans than the City of Ottawa ever will.)
Neighbourhoods are de facto segregated by language, schools are de jure segregated by language (and therefore so all sorts of extrecirrciular activities), pop culture is in English. If you speak English at home, the likelyhood of having exposure to French (without significant effort) outside of the allocated time in the classroom is pretty low.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 6:15 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
Neighbourhoods are de facto segregated by language, schools are de jure segregated by language (and therefore so all sorts of extrecirrciular activities), pop culture is in English. If you speak English at home, the likelyhood of having exposure to French (without significant effort) outside of the allocated time in the classroom is pretty low.
The rest of the world called. They'd like to have a word with you about this.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 3:50 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
You do not know the reality of the 1970s. I knew two people in my own family who 'left' their public service careers at that time because they were not bilingual.

.
Again, this is based on the fallacy that being unilingual is an unchangeable status like the colour of one's skin.

So these people willingly left government jobs instead of taking a stab at learning French?

Hard to believe that, or at least to be sympathetic.

I was only a kid in the 70s but what I do know of federal bilingualism is that was an imperfect beast for quite some time. Unilingual people were grandfathered into their positions which often led to gaps or breakdowns in bilingual service delivery to the public (for example).

The approach was to "ease in" bilingualism, as opposed to saying "as of Monday, everything has to be bilingual, and if you don't speak French, you're out!"

There is also a semi-infamous test that public servants could (maybe still can) pass in order to get a semi-scientific confirmation that they are cognitively unable to learn a second language. Quite a few unilingual people have passed this test in order to get grandfathered into bilingual positions even though they do not meet the language profile of their job. I know a few people in my wider entourage who had this status as recently as five years ago.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 8:13 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Again, this is based on the fallacy that being unilingual is an unchangeable status like the colour of one's skin.

So these people willingly left government jobs instead of taking a stab at learning French?

Hard to believe that, or at least to be sympathetic.
It is a known fact that people's abilities to learn another language decline with age and not all people have the same natural proficiency at learning other languages as an adult. Some are naturals, some are not. I remember reading that it has something to do with how people hear.

Regardless, I think a lot of people do not want to have to learn completely new skills late in their careers and this is not limited to languages.

We should not judge people to that degree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 9:12 PM
Bandage Bandage is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 37
Quebec would do itself a huge favour by recognizing English as an official language. Until that happens, I'm not giving francophones an inch when it comes to language laws. The hypocrisy just stinks too much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 10:37 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
It is a known fact that people's abilities to learn another language decline with age and not all people have the same natural proficiency at learning other languages as an adult. Some are naturals, some are not. I remember reading that it has something to do with how people hear.

Regardless, I think a lot of people do not want to have to learn completely new skills late in their careers and this is not limited to languages.

We should not judge people to that degree.
My degree in Linguistics comes in handy.

The ability to learn a language does not actually decline with age, but rather the facility to acquire it changes due to the more matured brain of an adult being neurologically different to that of a child. For example, studies find that children are better able to perceive a language's phonology more easily than an adult. Adults are still able to learn to speak and can achieve near-native fluency, but for them it can be a longer process to speak without much of an accent. Often, they will achieve a certain level of intelligibility and then plateau. You might be familiar with people who have thick accents despite living in a country and speaking that language for several years or longer as a result of this. Every human can produce the Spanish trilled 'r' or Arabic's pharyngeal fricatives. But as we grow into adults, we become used to exercising muscles/ organs used to produce certain speech sounds in our quotidian language. So, as an adult you may struggle with French's <u> or <eu> (as in pûr or feuille if [y, œ, ø] aren't in your language. But you can still learn those phonemes with practice. Having a speech language pathologist or a teacher trained in either that or linguistics would help as well. You might still have an accent, but you can learn to speak proficiently.

On a side note, those vowels are easy to produce, as it's a matter of "rounding your lips" as you do with <o> and <u> while saying "ee" or "ay".

As far as successful acquisition of the syntax and semantics, children's brains learn differently than an adult's. But adults still maintain the ability to learn languages, just as much as an adult is capable of learning anything. For monolingual speakers, they will continue to learn their own language throughout the rest of their lives. They will come into new vocabulary that they haven't previous encountered, and can successfully learn those new words. This is also the case with slang, jargon, and colloquialisms. The challenge with learning another language's syntax depends on one's ability to learn to think differently. For Indo-European languages like French and English, syntactically we're very similar, but the way we express some things differs. Learning to use imparfait, passé composé, plusqueparfait might be hard for us to understand at first because English expresses past/ completed actions differently. But in this case it's a matter of understanding chronology. Otherwise, word ordering and more can be "bullshitted" and calques can be used to express oneself even without complete knowledge of the grammar. Learning a non-Indo-European language is harder for us because the syntax will be different, and therefore "bullshitting" will be less sucessful. Japanese is an agglutinative language in the Altaic family. Sentences can consist of one verb only with multiple affixes attached to express different aspects (positive/negative, present/past, polite/rude), but can be changed to indicate potential, who does which action, wondering, etc. The sentence structure is completely different than English, too, with the ordering being SOV (subject-object-verb). So for an Anglophone learning Japanese, it can be challenging. Yet successfully acquiring the grammar is achieved merely by learning to think differently (think in the way Japanese is thought instead of how you express yourself in English).

People's ability to acquire new languages is not so much about hearing as it is about the activation of the limbic system. Our limbic system consists of different "primitive" parts of the brain that are responsible for emotion and memory. Essentially, if you are not motivated to learn something, you won't be successful at learning even if you try. The part of your brain responsible for remembering and recalling what you learn wasn't being activated properly, and therefore you won't be capable of encoding that information on the brain. This lack of motivation might be an emotional response to being forced to do or learn something you don't want, or even being too tired.

For example, someone might go through our education system and not be able to speak French very well. They may claim that they just aren't able to learn languages like other people. But their attempt to learn French was forced upon them by the education system, and typically the method of instruction fails to teach it properly. But on their own they might develop an interest in another country, like Japan. They love television, food, culture, fashion, geography, history, etc. from Japan, such that they want to visit, live in and absorb anything Japanese into their being. They will try to learn Japanese and, unlike with French, they become fluent speaking it. This is because they are personally motivated to learn Japanese as a result in their interest in Japan. However, they still can't speak French, which is a result in them not having the same emotional connection to the culture and language of Francophones.

So in short, every adult is capable of becoming bilingual/ polyglots (even those with learning disabilities or speech impediments). However, their success depends on their motivation and emotional response to learning the language, just as it is with learning anything. Compared to children, adults may seem to struggle to learn other languages, but that is merely because adult brains are wired differently than children's, and thus absorb language differently. This doesn't mean adults can't learn languages or that only a few "naturals" can.

Our second language instruction in Canada is quite inefficient. Part of this has to do with method of instruction, ability to use it, but the willingness of students to learn it. Teachers are expected to excited students to learn French by teaching them more than just grammar, but especially introducing them to aspects of culture that will appeal to them.

Last edited by Urbanarchit; Jun 1, 2017 at 11:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 2:30 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
It is a known fact that people's abilities to learn another language decline with age and not all people have the same natural proficiency at learning other languages as an adult. Some are naturals, some are not. I remember reading that it has something to do with how people hear.

Regardless, I think a lot of people do not want to have to learn completely new skills late in their careers and this is not limited to languages.

We should not judge people to that degree.
Anyone who would have been faced with this surprise dilemma ("Guess what Delmer, you're gonna need French for your job from now on...") would have retired long ago.

The federal government has been straightforward and transparent with its language requirements for employees for several decades. There are no excuses at this point.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.