View Single Post
  #6810  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2024, 3:42 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
VTA is doing this for the BART San Jose extension. It is *more* expensive than a traditional sequence with cut/cover stations, due to the increased volume of soil removal and the (much) deeper stations.
This might be the case for BART, since the platforms are 700 feet long - pretty much the longest rapid transit platforms in the world. By contrast, the LA light rail platforms are 250 feet long.

Any new-build subway system can build much more of its lines as cut-and-cover. When subsequent lines are built, they typically must be built deeply to pass beneath earlier lines. The next phase of the Second Ave. subway in NYC, for example, will have a very deep station at 125th St. because it will be built perpendicular to the existing existing 125th St. Lexington Ave. subway station...which is directly below Metro North's elevated station.

Similarly, the addition of elevated transit lines to cities that have expressway networks means that the lines might have to pass very high above the existing expressways.
Reply With Quote