View Single Post
  #2043  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2007, 1:57 AM
Attrill Attrill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
They need for Chicago to pay a huge license fee to have a municipally-owned casino. The fee, plus the tax revenue from that (as well as incremental tax revenue from expansion of existing riverboat casinos and installation of slot machines at racetracks), would pay for capital construction throughout the state. Or so the theory goes. So yeah, they need us, and need us bad, for that license fee and tax revenue. Let them come crawling and groveling. It's about time they stop getting away with portraying Chicago as the leech to their constituents.
I'm not a big fan of the casino proposal to bail out the CTA/RTA. Here's a good article spelling out how the money brought in from a $1 billion casino in Chicago would likely be distributed. "Huge license fee" is right - $500 million huge! Maybe some would come back to the city, but not likely. Chicago is estimated to get $150 million, most of it going to the CTA.
__________________
"Think like men of action. Act like men of thought."
Henri Bergson
Reply With Quote