Quote:
Originally Posted by upupaway007
The interesting thing to me about this rumor is that, if the goal is to have something that allows them to quickly scale up, why go with a property that needs extensive renovations? This city is filled with sub-leasable space that could meet their needs. If they do go this route, the ability to scale quickly may be less important than getting an iconic building.
|
Because there are specific requirements that they have that may not fit that bill. At the end of the day, working remotely in that period of time or figuring out how to utilize the existing space with hybrid approach may work better.
Or they could do what you are saying but temporarily. Companies like Google with a lot of money aren't typically going to go with a cookie cutter office layout. They have specific requirements but cookie cutter could absolutely be an interim solution until a build out is complete.
My company did this while building out a new NYC space. We went into an older building that wasn't great but we could still work. A year later when renovations were done we moved to the new office.