Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu
Is the idea that they have to following the design standards or they just can't build on it? I guess it depends on which vacant lots fall in there, which districts, etc. If it's all about design then there's nothing stopping someone on a purely residential street from designing something in those standards. I guess it depends on how strict the zoning is.
|
the push back (according to crain's) seems to be that the lot was somehow indented to be left vacant as a side yard, even though it's a full lot, and never meant to be built on. not sure how you can prove that to the landmarks committee.