[BrinChi]

^ I think I understand why she said no. As the incumbent, to answer yes would imply either ignorance that she didn't know about this study, or incompetence that she couldn't influence CPD to make any strategy adjustments. Her answer claims that the study precedes recent updates for how CPD deploys its officers. Who the hell knows if that means CPD is now deploying officers in line with the recommendation of the study. But she hedges on that too by raising doubt about the assumption that more police patrolling = more violence prevention. After reading her answer, I thought it was pretty smart actually. Disclosure: I'm not voting for LL.