Quote:
Originally Posted by rlw777
I'm not advocating for a bunch of soulless architecture. I just think that imitations diminish the authenticity and value of the original. I think it's much better to have contrast that highlights and draws attention to the authentic. I think this benefits preservation efforts because it's common sense that people are much less likely to get rid of something that is obviously unique than something that without more scrutiny appears to be ubiquitous.
This same sort of thinking is the reason why the design guidelines for new construction in the Michigan Avenue Historic District ask for contemporary designs that do not replicate historic designs.
from Guidelines |
Exactly. This faux imitations - or at least the vast majority of them - actually undermine authentic historic structures and districts - and the overall goals of preservation. It's always been such simple, intuitive concept to understand for me, and I admit I often struggle to get why it's so difficult for many people.