Posted Jul 13, 2020, 7:25 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,750
|
|
Las Vegas is another almost entirely post-war city that is denser and more transit-oriented than one mighr expect for such new city.
Calgary population in 1951: 130,000
Las Vegas population in 1950: 48,000
Calgary population in 2011: 1,239,000
Las Vegas population in 2011: 1,951,000
Calgary urban density in 2011: 2,112 per sq km
Las Vegas urban density in 2010: 1,747 per sq km
Calgary high-rises: 365
Las Vegas high-rises: 172
Calgary annual transit boardings: 164 million
Las Vegas annual transit boardings: 67 million
The density and transit ridership of Las Vegas is on a completely different level compared to Nashville, Austin and Charlotte. Las Vegas is much closer to Calgary than any of those other cities.
I wouldn't include Denver simply because it is much older than Calgary. It had a population of 560,000 in 1950, so the pre-war city is much larger compared to Calgary.
|