Posted Jun 27, 2018, 3:17 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 585
|
|
At any rate, doing nothing to Union Station seems preferable to this design. The previous two-tower version was OK. Pedestrian, unexciting, sure, but inoffensive at least.
Maybe they could just leave Union Station alone, transfer all the FAR entitlements or whatever to 222 Riverside, tear that down, fix the platform and concourse levels (including adding through tracks) and then just build something GIGANTIC on top of the tracks at 222.
For Phase 1, build one of the towers planned for the adjacent blocks and relocate 222's tenants there.
|