View Single Post
  #2147  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2009, 6:48 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by northbay420 View Post
looks good. im kinda disappointed they didnt go with 1200 ft tho for the tower
They did! 1000 ft occupied + 200 ft ornamental/mechanical etc. (think wind turbine) allowed. But what's new is the minimum of 950 ft. I've never heard of SF imposing a height MINIMUM before. That means Hines (or whoever because I still won't be shocked if Hines sells their interest) can't scream "recession" and try to build something smaller and cheaper.
Reply With Quote