Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
This is a joke.
He's just trying to find a way to get someone else to pay for the most minimal possible renovations that would also coincidentally get the City off his back. So then once it's done he will have a barely-habitable building full of addicts, renovated by government and with government paying the rent ($$$), and no City vacant building fees. All this urban magic a stone's throw from Portage and Main. Sounds awesome.
|
Say this does come to pass - I'm not sure this is actually a worse scenario than the status quo. Minimal renovations is still a big improvement, and the city gains some needed low-income housing.