Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean
An opinion that is objectively wrong should not be held to the same merit as an opinion that is factual.
|
Good to know. Thanks for clearing that up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean
It is clearly covered by a facade of painted stucco.
|
I understand. I was clearly the one that pointed out the building was covered in stucco around 1935 and asked if anyone had any decent pre-35 pictures of the structure, beyond the one I posted, one page back.
That doesn't change the fact that if there is a viable plan for another building, then I think this particular structure can, and should, be removed.
If a wall or something can be saved/reused in the process, even better! That would be a smart move by the developer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean
You being objectively wrong over and over again is not an insult.
|
We are on the same page, sorry I misunderstood. As long as we think our opinion is 'objectively more correct' than anothers, we have free reign. Solid.
