Quote:
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
Although I also preferred the Giants proposal, I would take any proposal at this point, if it meant development of the area over the next 2-3 years. I think that the economic slowdown and the halt to many city developments is a much larger issue than the aesthetic variance between proposals.
|
To me, development just for development's sake is twisted logic, similar to that which inflicted this city with so much bad architecture previously. I'd much rather see that land sit exactly as it is now until something stunning can be built that is appropriate to that prominent site. Why do some of you want to sell us short?