[SFView]

^Thanks.

More thoughts, and they're just thoughts: California’s Density Bonus Law as a Law should have precedence over all current local codes, zoning, ordinances and jurisdictions unless it conflicts with health and safety. As long as all criteria is meet within the Bonus Law, any claims within the new limits of this Law should be defensible in Court. Planning still has the right to make recommendations to reduce height less than the Law permits, but following them is optional. Let me know if this isn't true, especially since I'm not with Planning, but having such a law doesn't make sense to me to have otherwise. I'm also guessing that if Hines didn't feel confident that 1066 feet tall is possible, they probably wouldn't be so serious and aggressive about pursuing it.